Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patrick Turner wrote:
(SNIP, SNIP, SNIP) Now in the real world we find that we can't really build our perfect series loaded tank circuits, and some shunt losses intrude, causing the tank Q to not increase as much as we would like at the high frequencies, which results in a somewhat wider bandwidth at the top of the dial. I suspect that the designers of these sets made an effort to compensate somewhat for this effect, by choosing Qs that made the bandwidth slightly narrower than optimal at the low end of the band True. (more SNIP) For TRF, I'd suggest trying a "loosely coupled" antenna input coil, then 3 other identical LC coils so a 4 gang tuning cap is required, or a pair of old but identical twin gangs, with those large dia wheels attatched of the same dia, allowing the dial cord to be run around the two wheels. Be advised that the old 1920's multi-gang tuning caps are generally found nowadays in very leaky condition. A thorough cleaning and baking is quite often called for in order to have them behave respectfully. All coils can be wound at home using 1.5" cardboard tubes and 0.4mm dia wire. The coils need screening, so don't be tempted to use old steel tins from the kitchen, that will damage the Q. Cans must be 1" away from windings, and done with Al or Cu sheet, but need only be quite thin material. Cardboard tubes are desirable if one is looking for MINIMUM Q. If your humidity hovers above zero percent you can count on even lower Q...but it won't be predictable :-) Nowadays a nice solid/consistent BCB inductor can be made with an FT-82-61 toroid core with +/- 50 turns of #26 enamelled wire approaching midband unloaded Q numbers of 300 or better. I've yet to find any coil from an old BCB TRF set that comes even close to this. Under 100 is not atypical. An added advantage using toroids is that screening is not normally required. Shoving a 1.5" solenoid coil into a box with only 1" of spacing is a good way to kill the Q of the ckt. But, I've described a method of getting 3kc selectivity at the low end of the band that will likely be 20-25kc (measured, not a guess) at the high end in a 2-stage set. The point is only to illustrate why this isn't as good an idea as superhetting. In the real world my experience says a 2 or 3 or 4 stage set works great on a 650kc station with another strong local present at 700kc. But it (the same scheme) will NOT work for your 1450kc station with a strong local at 1500kc. This is a shirt load of work to trim for equal performance along the band. Hasn't yet been accomplished in 80+ years of radio... -BM |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Policy | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE | Shortwave |