"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
I was responding to a right-wing conservative who said pochers should be
shot
on sight without a trial. I was attempting to show him how stupid that
line
was. Little did I think that all the neocons in the NG would take the joke
out
of context. Their humor is unidirectional.

Poachers = criminals.

dxAce wrote:

Here is the text verbatim...

Return-Path:
X-Envelope-To:
From:
Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2004 22:47:45 EDT
Subject: Please Read
To:
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version
0.70j

Steve,

You win. I'll do whatever you please. Please don't drag my employers
into
this newsgroup ****.

I'm willing to publicly apologize and leave the NG. I'll never send you
another email.

I need my job. Please.

I don't have your savings. Please think of my family.

Mike Bryant
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Personally, I'm growing tired of the Fat Boy's antics.

By the way, he works at:

http://www.louisvilletech.com/conten...=&siteid=&app=

Steve
Holland, MI
Drake R7, R8 and R8B

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

I'm still waiting for him to leave.

From: dxAce

I'm still waiting for him to leave.

But you told me to stay when I talked to you on the phone, right? You blew
your opportunity! ;-)

Have a nice day, Steve!




Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A
GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nojunk" to reply)

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: dxAce

I'm still waiting for him to leave.

But you told me to stay when I talked to you on the phone, right? You blew
your opportunity! ;-)

Have a nice day, Steve!

Yep, just more lies from the Fat Boy!

Better look for a job! LOL

m II wrote:

-=jd=- wrote:

I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves
as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND-
that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize
that fact!

Cry me a river...

The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request
NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the
same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks.

How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of
some unimportant newsgroup BS?

The facts are, and remain, that Bryant was NOT fired from Louisville Technical
Institute.

Why he posted here that I had cost him his job, and indeed called me on the
phone indicating that he'd lost his job is beyond me.

So, I called Louisville Tech the next day and inquired if he was still employed
there, and indeed he was.

Subsequent posts from Michael W. Bryant also indicate that he is still employed
by Louisville Tech.

One further phone check indicated that he is still employed there.

And not surprisingly enough, Michael W. Bryant had the nerve to try and tell me
that I'd never made the call.

So, if one wants lies, distortions and fabrications, just look to Michael W.
Bryant.

Boggling.

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:23:50 -0400, dxAce wrote:



m II wrote:

-=jd=- wrote:

I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves
as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND-
that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize
that fact!

Cry me a river...

The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request
NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the
same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks.

How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of
some unimportant newsgroup BS?

The facts are, and remain, that Bryant was NOT fired from Louisville Technical
Institute.

Why he posted here that I had cost him his job, and indeed called me on the
phone indicating that he'd lost his job is beyond me.

So, I called Louisville Tech the next day and inquired if he was still employed
there, and indeed he was.

Subsequent posts from Michael W. Bryant also indicate that he is still employed
by Louisville Tech.

One further phone check indicated that he is still employed there.

And not surprisingly enough, Michael W. Bryant had the nerve to try and tell me
that I'd never made the call.

So, if one wants lies, distortions and fabrications, just look to Michael W.
Bryant.

Boggling.


Only you care 'tard. You need to get out of the house and spend some
of that settlement money. What a maroon

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:23:50 -0400, dxAce wrote:



m II wrote:

-=jd=- wrote:

I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves
as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND-
that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize
that fact!

Cry me a river...

The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request
NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the
same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks.

How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of
some unimportant newsgroup BS?

The facts are, and remain, that Bryant was NOT fired from Louisville Technical
Institute.

Why he posted here that I had cost him his job, and indeed called me on the
phone indicating that he'd lost his job is beyond me.

So, I called Louisville Tech the next day and inquired if he was still employed
there, and indeed he was.

Subsequent posts from Michael W. Bryant also indicate that he is still employed
by Louisville Tech.

One further phone check indicated that he is still employed there.

And not surprisingly enough, Michael W. Bryant had the nerve to try and tell me
that I'd never made the call.

So, if one wants lies, distortions and fabrications, just look to Michael W.
Bryant.

Boggling.


what's really boggling is what a complete fool you make of yourself from day to day.
who do you think cares about any of your assertions?

RSMTMN wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:23:50 -0400, dxAce wrote:



m II wrote:

-=jd=- wrote:

I see absolutely nothing wrong with it at all. In fact, I think it serves
as an *excellent* demonstration that "Free Speech" works both ways -AND-
that those who proclaim it the loudest seems to be the last to realize
that fact!

Cry me a river...

The email was sent in an expectation of privacy and was a request
NOT to bother his employers. A public disclosure of it is about the
same as a wire tap on an unknowing person. It stinks.

How would you feel if someone close to you lost a job because of
some unimportant newsgroup BS?

The facts are, and remain, that Bryant was NOT fired from Louisville Technical
Institute.

Why he posted here that I had cost him his job, and indeed called me on the
phone indicating that he'd lost his job is beyond me.

So, I called Louisville Tech the next day and inquired if he was still employed
there, and indeed he was.

Subsequent posts from Michael W. Bryant also indicate that he is still employed
by Louisville Tech.

One further phone check indicated that he is still employed there.

And not surprisingly enough, Michael W. Bryant had the nerve to try and tell me
that I'd never made the call.

So, if one wants lies, distortions and fabrications, just look to Michael W.
Bryant.

Boggling.


what's really boggling is what a complete fool you make of yourself from day to day.
who do you think cares about any of your assertions?

You do! You took the time and trouble to fabricate a totally bogus, brand new ID just to
respond to my post.

"Tarapia Tapioco" wrote:

Maybe he was fired from his OTHER job.

You know ..... night security guard at the
Cheetos factory?


Hey, wait a minute. I worked as a night security guard at a Cheetos
factory many years ago (in Ontario while attending UCLA) and it was a darn
good job with side benefits - still addicted to Cheetos to this day.

Stewart