Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Al Dykes wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Frank Dresser wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... Story on Drudge says Air America is strapped for cash, and had less than they claimed when they started. Looks like maybe the check for Chicago did bounce. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm Actually, the check never had a chance to bounce. Arthur Liu at Multicultural was told the check was stopped, so he shouldn't even bother depositing it. Matt Drudge has been taking a pointed interest in the Air America story, possibly because some numbnut at Air America wrote the infamous "Liu-ser" article ridiculing Drudge and Liu. "The WALL STREET JOURNAL reports on Monday: Several employees say they still haven't been reimbursed for the costs of attending the New York launch." "Many of Air America's investors and executives say they thought the network had raised more than $30 million, based on assurances from its owners, Guam-based entrepreneurs Evan M. Cohen and Rex Sorensen." "In fact, Air America had raised only $6 million, Mr. Cohen concedes" What were the investors thinking about, just before the network started up? Were they throwing their money into the Democratic party? The "Tyco Birthday Party"? "On March 30, the night before Air America went on the air, the liberal radio network threw itself a $70,000 party at Manhattan's hip Maritime Hotel." This story isn't new but it does add some details to the known problems Air America's management had. They announced a possible deal with new investors over a month ago. I have no idea how that's going. Air America may have been started up by incompetent businessmen, but they have shown there's a market for that kind of radio. If they can't do it right, somebody else will. Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. But they're not, are they? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. It seems that Fox was $150 million in the red for the first 2 years of operation. You can't expect them to be turning a profit in the first 2 months of operation. Yes, and FOX is a totally different type of operation, is it not? We're talking radio here... If there were a market for that type of show the stations would be breaking down Air America's door... and they are not. At least at this point in time Air America is a flop, and as I stated originally, just as predicted. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
"LW" wrote in message om... Maybe they should book profit Stair a few hours a day. Not sure if he's divorced, but his thing for "young sisters" would certainly make him quite a *moral voice*. Profit Stair's talent for fund-raising should have Air America out of debt in no time. Maybe he could sell tiny-tennas on Air America to go with the radios he sold on WWCR. Yeah, just where has Brother Stair been? Sinners are a dime a dozen, but Brother Stair is missing a chance to preach to sinners who are willing to **** away a fortune. Air America should give their whole operation to Brother Stair. His lean and mean business practices would have Air America in sound financial condition in no time. No more big salaries. In fact, no more salaries at all. The Air America staff will be moved to the highly cost-efficient worker housing development of Walterboro. They better not expect any more $70,000 parties, either. Not in this lifetime, anyway. However, some of Air America's ladies might feel a bit, um -- mature for Brother Stair's septuagenarian interest. I suggest they tell the Prophet -- "Please don't think of me as twenty-eight years old. Think of me as two fourteen year olds!!" Frank Dresser |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
FD,
"If they can't do it right, somebody else will." RUSH DOES IT "RIGHT" ! The Ultra-Liberals at Air {Head} America need to Focus on Doing It "LEFT" Big Time ! ~ RHF .. .. = = = "Frank Dresser" wrote in message = = = ... "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... Story on Drudge says Air America is strapped for cash, and had less than they claimed when they started. Looks like maybe the check for Chicago did bounce. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm Actually, the check never had a chance to bounce. Arthur Liu at Multicultural was told the check was stopped, so he shouldn't even bother depositing it. Matt Drudge has been taking a pointed interest in the Air America story, possibly because some numbnut at Air America wrote the infamous "Liu-ser" article ridiculing Drudge and Liu. "The WALL STREET JOURNAL reports on Monday: Several employees say they still haven't been reimbursed for the costs of attending the New York launch." "Many of Air America's investors and executives say they thought the network had raised more than $30 million, based on assurances from its owners, Guam-based entrepreneurs Evan M. Cohen and Rex Sorensen." "In fact, Air America had raised only $6 million, Mr. Cohen concedes" What were the investors thinking about, just before the network started up? Were they throwing their money into the Democratic party? The "Tyco Birthday Party"? "On March 30, the night before Air America went on the air, the liberal radio network threw itself a $70,000 party at Manhattan's hip Maritime Hotel." This story isn't new but it does add some details to the known problems Air America's management had. They announced a possible deal with new investors over a month ago. I have no idea how that's going. Air America may have been started up by incompetent businessmen, but they have shown there's a market for that kind of radio. If they can't do it right, somebody else will. Frank Dresser .. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
In article , dxAce wrote: Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. There seems to be a market, at least right now. Al Franken beat Rush Limbaugh in New York. "For example, among listeners from 25 and 54, whom advertisers covet, the network estimates it drew an average listener share (roughly a percentage of listeners) of 3.4 on WLIB in April, from 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. on weekdays, according to the company's extrapolation of figures provided by Arbitron for the three months ended in April. (Arbitron, which does not provide ratings in monthly increments, said the network's methodology appeared sound, although such figures were too raw to translate to numbers of listeners.) " By contrast, according to Air America's figures, WABC-AM drew an average share of 3.2 during the same period in April for the same age group. That time period includes the three hours in which Mr. Limbaugh was pitted head to head against Mr. Franken. " http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0531-08.htm Air America is in poor financial condition because they were started up by nit-wits. They vastly overestimated their start up cash, they needlessly antagonized a station owner and they had some goofy plan in which they insisted they control all the programming on their affiliates. They paid a million bucks to the stations in Chicago and New York for almost nothing. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. Maybe they are. Their start-up ratings look good. If the ratings hold, the money will be coming in. That doesn't mean they won't manage to spend more than they take in, though. But they're not, are they? How do you know they are not raking in the dough? Are you suggesting advertisers aren't interested in good ratings? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. Rush, Hannity and Boortz aren't running networks. They are backed by competent businessmen. If Air America fails, and that doesn't seem unlikely, I'm sure somebody will pick up the pieces and do it competently. Frank Dresser |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Dresser wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. There seems to be a market, at least right now. Al Franken beat Rush Limbaugh in New York. "For example, among listeners from 25 and 54, whom advertisers covet, the network estimates it drew an average listener share (roughly a percentage of listeners) of 3.4 on WLIB in April, from 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. on weekdays, according to the company's extrapolation of figures provided by Arbitron for the three months ended in April. (Arbitron, which does not provide ratings in monthly increments, said the network's methodology appeared sound, although such figures were too raw to translate to numbers of listeners.) " By contrast, according to Air America's figures, WABC-AM drew an average share of 3.2 during the same period in April for the same age group. That time period includes the three hours in which Mr. Limbaugh was pitted head to head against Mr. Franken. " http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0531-08.htm Air America is in poor financial condition because they were started up by nit-wits. They vastly overestimated their start up cash, they needlessly antagonized a station owner and they had some goofy plan in which they insisted they control all the programming on their affiliates. They paid a million bucks to the stations in Chicago and New York for almost nothing. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. Maybe they are. Their start-up ratings look good. If the ratings hold, the money will be coming in. That doesn't mean they won't manage to spend more than they take in, though. But they're not, are they? How do you know they are not raking in the dough? Are you suggesting advertisers aren't interested in good ratings? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. Rush, Hannity and Boortz aren't running networks. They are backed by competent businessmen. If Air America fails, and that doesn't seem unlikely, I'm sure somebody will pick up the pieces and do it competently. Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. Air America doesn't need to run a network either, all they need to do is sell a program, and to date, the program isn't selling, at least in mainstream America. It's nice to quote figures from New York City and environs, but they should be an easy sell there, right? The bottom line is and remains, they just ain't making it, as predicted. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... In article , dxAce wrote: Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. There seems to be a market, at least right now. Al Franken beat Rush Limbaugh in New York. "For example, among listeners from 25 and 54, whom advertisers covet, the network estimates it drew an average listener share (roughly a percentage of listeners) of 3.4 on WLIB in April, from 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. on weekdays, according to the company's extrapolation of figures provided by Arbitron for the three months ended in April. (Arbitron, which does not provide ratings in monthly increments, said the network's methodology appeared sound, although such figures were too raw to translate to numbers of listeners.) " By contrast, according to Air America's figures, WABC-AM drew an average share of 3.2 during the same period in April for the same age group. That time period includes the three hours in which Mr. Limbaugh was pitted head to head against Mr. Franken. " http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0531-08.htm While I don't doubt that NYC is potentially fertile ground for Air America, particularly for a New Yawker wannabe like Franken, I'm not buying those numbers as proving much. Cases in point: "the network estimates..." "according to the company's extrapolation of figures provided by Arbitron..." methodology "sound" but "numbers were to raw too translate to numbers of listeners.."..... "According to Air America's figures, WABC-AM drew...." It seems like any "extrapolations" of "raw numbers" from a bunch that couldn't extrapolate the raw numbers they needed for a start up should be looked at skeptically to say the least. Air America needs angels to keep them running; my guess is that they'll "extrapolate" as favorably as possible to get investors on board. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
dxAce wrote: Frank Dresser wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. There seems to be a market, at least right now. Al Franken beat Rush Limbaugh in New York. "For example, among listeners from 25 and 54, whom advertisers covet, the network estimates it drew an average listener share (roughly a percentage of listeners) of 3.4 on WLIB in April, from 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. on weekdays, according to the company's extrapolation of figures provided by Arbitron for the three months ended in April. (Arbitron, which does not provide ratings in monthly increments, said the network's methodology appeared sound, although such figures were too raw to translate to numbers of listeners.) " By contrast, according to Air America's figures, WABC-AM drew an average share of 3.2 during the same period in April for the same age group. That time period includes the three hours in which Mr. Limbaugh was pitted head to head against Mr. Franken. " http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0531-08.htm Air America is in poor financial condition because they were started up by nit-wits. They vastly overestimated their start up cash, they needlessly antagonized a station owner and they had some goofy plan in which they insisted they control all the programming on their affiliates. They paid a million bucks to the stations in Chicago and New York for almost nothing. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. Maybe they are. Their start-up ratings look good. If the ratings hold, the money will be coming in. That doesn't mean they won't manage to spend more than they take in, though. But they're not, are they? How do you know they are not raking in the dough? Are you suggesting advertisers aren't interested in good ratings? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. Rush, Hannity and Boortz aren't running networks. They are backed by competent businessmen. If Air America fails, and that doesn't seem unlikely, I'm sure somebody will pick up the pieces and do it competently. Aye, there's the rub! There are no Liberal's who do anything whatsoever competently. Air America doesn't need to run a network either, all they need to do is sell a program, and to date, the program isn't selling, at least in mainstream America. It's nice to quote figures from New York City and environs, but they should be an easy sell there, right? The bottom line is and remains, they just ain't making it, as predicted. One thing I forgot to add, and that is, that I consider Air America to be like flatulence; it may be necessary, but it's not very nice! Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... In article , dxAce wrote: Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. There seems to be a market, at least right now. Al Franken beat Rush Limbaugh in New York. No, he appeared to have beaten Rush in one age group in April. However, in the May ratings trends, Rush returns to beat Franken by about three to one overall, and WABC to beat WLIB by more than 300%. Your figures are last month's Arbitrend data, these are this month's. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
I'm beginning to think that RHF stands for "Rush Has Fans".
Bad joke but I just couldn't resist. Regards John Barnard RHF wrote: FD, "If they can't do it right, somebody else will." RUSH DOES IT "RIGHT" ! The Ultra-Liberals at Air {Head} America need to Focus on Doing It "LEFT" Big Time ! ~ RHF . . = = = "Frank Dresser" wrote in message = = = ... "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... Story on Drudge says Air America is strapped for cash, and had less than they claimed when they started. Looks like maybe the check for Chicago did bounce. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm Actually, the check never had a chance to bounce. Arthur Liu at Multicultural was told the check was stopped, so he shouldn't even bother depositing it. Matt Drudge has been taking a pointed interest in the Air America story, possibly because some numbnut at Air America wrote the infamous "Liu-ser" article ridiculing Drudge and Liu. "The WALL STREET JOURNAL reports on Monday: Several employees say they still haven't been reimbursed for the costs of attending the New York launch." "Many of Air America's investors and executives say they thought the network had raised more than $30 million, based on assurances from its owners, Guam-based entrepreneurs Evan M. Cohen and Rex Sorensen." "In fact, Air America had raised only $6 million, Mr. Cohen concedes" What were the investors thinking about, just before the network started up? Were they throwing their money into the Democratic party? The "Tyco Birthday Party"? "On March 30, the night before Air America went on the air, the liberal radio network threw itself a $70,000 party at Manhattan's hip Maritime Hotel." This story isn't new but it does add some details to the known problems Air America's management had. They announced a possible deal with new investors over a month ago. I have no idea how that's going. Air America may have been started up by incompetent businessmen, but they have shown there's a market for that kind of radio. If they can't do it right, somebody else will. Frank Dresser . |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Al Dykes wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: Frank Dresser wrote: "Mark S. Holden" wrote in message ... Story on Drudge says Air America is strapped for cash, and had less than they claimed when they started. Looks like maybe the check for Chicago did bounce. http://www.drudgereport.com/flash8.htm Actually, the check never had a chance to bounce. Arthur Liu at Multicultural was told the check was stopped, so he shouldn't even bother depositing it. Matt Drudge has been taking a pointed interest in the Air America story, possibly because some numbnut at Air America wrote the infamous "Liu-ser" article ridiculing Drudge and Liu. "The WALL STREET JOURNAL reports on Monday: Several employees say they still haven't been reimbursed for the costs of attending the New York launch." "Many of Air America's investors and executives say they thought the network had raised more than $30 million, based on assurances from its owners, Guam-based entrepreneurs Evan M. Cohen and Rex Sorensen." "In fact, Air America had raised only $6 million, Mr. Cohen concedes" What were the investors thinking about, just before the network started up? Were they throwing their money into the Democratic party? The "Tyco Birthday Party"? "On March 30, the night before Air America went on the air, the liberal radio network threw itself a $70,000 party at Manhattan's hip Maritime Hotel." This story isn't new but it does add some details to the known problems Air America's management had. They announced a possible deal with new investors over a month ago. I have no idea how that's going. Air America may have been started up by incompetent businessmen, but they have shown there's a market for that kind of radio. If they can't do it right, somebody else will. Hardly... if there was indeed a market, then they would not be in the financial mess they appear to be in. They'd be raking in the dough through advertising. But they're not, are they? Maybe they need to take lessons from Rush, Hannity, Boortz, etc..... now those guys are making money. It seems that Fox was $150 million in the red for the first 2 years of operation. You can't expect them to be turning a profit in the first 2 months of operation. Yes, and FOX is a totally different type of operation, is it not? We're talking radio here... If there were a market for that type of show the stations would be breaking down Air America's door... and they are not. Fox ran in the red for two years. TV may dig a bigger hole, but it's still a hole. It's a rare startup company of any tipe that is profitable in the first year. The Wall Street Journal has a article about AA on Tuesday that I'm told was overall favorable about their business model. -- Al Dykes ----------- adykes at p a n i x . c o m |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voice of America used to emanate from Dixon | Broadcasting | |||
AIR AMERICA In Deep Financial Crisis | Broadcasting | |||
Air America | Shortwave | |||
Air America - where every flight crashes | Shortwave | |||
Fwd: R Prague A 04 Summer Schedule | Shortwave |