Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill E wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:15:04 -0600, JJ wrote: Bill E wrote: On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:32:59 -0600, JJ wrote: Also, even if I *really do* need a license to transmit, I don't need a license to turn the radio on and listen, do I? You do not need a license to just listen. This is not exactly true. The FCC is currently considering a requirement for a "listener" license. The ruling is related to the new Patriot Act and says: Article 10:2:3a The requirement of said radio operator to be licensed in hereto state of operation for receiving Ham bands. See also this link: www.us.gov/radioreq/lic/listener Regards I doubt that will ever fly, but until if/when it ever does I stand by my statement which is exactly true, you do not need a license to listen to the ham bands or any sw bands. I could not get the link to work. Here's your sign. ??????? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"JJ" wrote:
(snip) No one is going to bust through your front door, but the hams, who will uncover you sharade rather quickly, will file a report with the FCC and you will get one of those letters wanting to know why you are transmitting on the ham bands without a license and to continue doing so can result in a hefty fine. (snip) Most non-hams would probably be amazed at how much effort the FCC has put towards making the Amateur radio service effective at self-policing, including guidelines on locating & identifying the offending party (rdf/foxhunting), evidence gathering (times, frequencies, tape recordings, and so on), reporting procedures, attending ham activities to encourage cooperation, and more. Ham operators have access to a massive amount of frequecies, spread across the entire radio spectrum. They also have great liberty in the technology that can be used. As such, the FCC takes this radio service seriously and expects the operators to do the same. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = ink.net... "JJ" wrote: (snip) No one is going to bust through your front door, but the hams, who will uncover you sharade rather quickly, will file a report with the FCC and you will get one of those letters wanting to know why you are transmitting on the ham bands without a license and to continue doing so can result in a hefty fine. (snip) Most non-hams would probably be amazed at how much effort the FCC has put towards making the Amateur radio service effective at self-policing, including guidelines on locating & identifying the offending party (rdf/foxhunting), evidence gathering (times, frequencies, tape recordings, and so on), reporting procedures, attending ham activities to encourage cooperation, and more. Ham operators have access to a massive amount of frequecies, spread across the entire radio spectrum. They also have great liberty in the technology that can be used. As such, the FCC takes this radio service seriously and expects the operators to do the same. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ DS et al, I sorry, I have to Laugh. But this last couple of posts reads like the FCC (Gestapo) and the Amateurs (the Hitler Youth) during the NAZI Era. Something to Think About ~ RHF .. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"RHF" wrote:
DS et al, I sorry, I have to Laugh. But this last couple of posts reads like the FCC (Gestapo) and the Amateurs (the Hitler Youth) during the NAZI Era. Something to Think About ~ RHF Perhaps one would think that if one considers all forms of restrictions and enforcement to be Nazi-like. However, most people agree reasonable restrictions, and enforcement of those restrictions, are necessary for members of societies to co-exist in any civilized manner. And, unlike Nazi Germany, we all have a clear say in those FCC restrictions and enforcement, through public comments over proposed rules and through our election of those who appoint the commission members and oversee their actions. Most within the radio community agree restrictions and enforcement are valuable, and were successful at convincing legislators outside the radio community of that. You're certainly free to disagree, but your disagreement in itself doesn't make those restrictions and enforcement Nazi-like. Something for you to think about. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dwight Stewart wrote:
And, unlike Nazi Germany, we all have a clear say in those FCC restrictions and enforcement, through public comments over proposed rules and through our election of those who appoint the commission members and oversee their actions. When it comes to topics like BPL, the FCC seems more responsive to industry lobbyists than the public comments. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net... "RHF" wrote: DS et al, I sorry, I have to Laugh. But this last couple of posts reads like the FCC (Gestapo) and the Amateurs (the Hitler Youth) during the NAZI Era. Something to Think About ~ RHF Perhaps one would think that if one considers all forms of restrictions and enforcement to be Nazi-like. However, most people agree reasonable restrictions, and enforcement of those restrictions, are necessary for members of societies to co-exist in any civilized manner. And, unlike Nazi Germany, we all have a clear say in those FCC restrictions and enforcement, through public comments over proposed rules and through our election of those who appoint the commission members and oversee their actions. Most within the radio community agree restrictions and enforcement are valuable, and were successful at convincing legislators outside the radio community of that. You're certainly free to disagree, but your disagreement in itself doesn't make those restrictions and enforcement Nazi-like. Something for you to think about. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ DS - So t all comes down to 'community standards' ;-) ~ RHF .. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:01:20 GMT, "Corwin, Prince of Amber"
wrote: All right. I get the idea. Thanks. My radio is up at my house in the Pocono Mountains, PA, not where I live here in NYC, so I suppose I'll buy an antenna (good grief, not I've got to figure *that* out!) and see if I can hear anyone talking. If I get reception I'll put in the time and effort to understand what I'm doing. Thanks again. I'll let you know if I succeed. I never even considered leaving the radio here in my apartment. You can't just stick the antenna out an open window and expect to get results, right, or can you . . ? Rick Bryan New York, NY |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
An antenna out the window will do wonders. With a Radio Shack DX 398 and its
rollup antenna I am able to pick up many major SW stations. The rollup extends to 23 feet to the nearest support -- in my case a palm tree. A wire would do just as well. -- Lamont Cranston The Shadow Knows "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:01:20 GMT, "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote: All right. I get the idea. Thanks. My radio is up at my house in the Pocono Mountains, PA, not where I live here in NYC, so I suppose I'll buy an antenna (good grief, not I've got to figure *that* out!) and see if I can hear anyone talking. If I get reception I'll put in the time and effort to understand what I'm doing. Thanks again. I'll let you know if I succeed. I never even considered leaving the radio here in my apartment. You can't just stick the antenna out an open window and expect to get results, right, or can you . . ? Rick Bryan New York, NY |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote in message ... On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:01:20 GMT, "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote: All right. I get the idea. Thanks. My radio is up at my house in the Pocono Mountains, PA, not where I live here in NYC, so I suppose I'll buy an antenna (good grief, not I've got to figure *that* out!) and see if I can hear anyone talking. If I get reception I'll put in the time and effort to understand what I'm doing. Thanks again. I'll let you know if I succeed. I never even considered leaving the radio here in my apartment. You can't just stick the antenna out an open window and expect to get results, right, or can you . . ? Absolutly you can. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "coustanis"
writes: Subject: Excuse me. Do you *really* need a license? From: "coustanis" Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 21:15:08 -0400 "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote in message .. . On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:01:20 GMT, "Corwin, Prince of Amber" wrote: All right. I get the idea. Thanks. My radio is up at my house in the Pocono Mountains, PA, not where I live here in NYC, so I suppose I'll buy an antenna (good grief, not I've got to figure *that* out!) and see if I can hear anyone talking. If I get reception I'll put in the time and effort to understand what I'm doing. Thanks again. I'll let you know if I succeed. I never even considered leaving the radio here in my apartment. You can't just stick the antenna out an open window and expect to get results, right, or can you . . ? Absolutly you can. Stealth Apartment Antenna design & construction procedures.. __________________________________________________ ______ MATERIALS Some Stranded, Insulated copper wire from Radio shack Colors so it matches the bricks / outside of your building Some stick-on Cord holders One tube clear Silicone sealer glue One black magic marker A roll of Duct tape color of outside of apt. One Mop One piece of twine or string. One Small soft edged weight. PROCEDU See how far it is in between two windows of your Apt.. Measure out a piece of string this distance + ~ 6 - 8 feet. Attach a small soft edged weight to it. ( Look Outside to see no one is looking !! ) Secure curious household pets Open Both Windows. Insert mop part way out one] Close that window to secure mop handle Run over to the other window QUICK! Take the twine with the weight on it & (without risking life & limb) Toss the string over the mop sticking out the other window. Secure the end of that end of the string with a bit of slack Close that window Run over to the other window with the mop that has the twine handing down off it Pull the mop in Close the window. ( Breath deeply ) NOW.... Attach the stranded wire to the end of the string. Slightly open window Run over to the oher window. Open it & pull in string until wire / string connection is through.. Pull in enough so that wire will reach SWR Attach wire to SWR. Close window. - That's basically it. Modify as needed. You can take Square stick -on cord holders Camouflage them with magic Marker color , & Silicone glue them to the outside corners of the window, Then loop more wire ( DONT FALL OUT WHEN DOING THIS !!) around the cord holders. This makes the antenna longer. repeat for other windows..This should help lots.. ( Works for me !!) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB |