In article , Patrick Turner
wrote:

I don't have the time to debate this any longer.

Hi Patrick,

You seem to be the one that wants a debate where one is not necessary, or
asked for. There is nothing to debate here, I understand yours and Phil's
position in a qualitative sense, but I find yours and Phil's approach
somewhat counter intuitive, just as you find my approach counter
intuitive. You say that your approach to LC tuned circuits is described
in many text books, I have not found any, although admittedly I have not
been searching specifically for information on your approach to LC tuned
circuits. All I have asked you for is a simple citation to a textbook
where I can find out more about your approach, especially the quantitative
aspects of your approach, and how to make use of it in design problems.
While it is easy to understand your idea from a qualitative perspective, I
don't understand how to actually apply it. I would prefer to learn that
from a textbook rather than taking your time to have you explain it
further.

I don't want to repeat what I have already said.

I'm not asking you to repeat anything, I am only asking you to provide a
citation for one of the textbooks that gives a good description of your
approach to LC tuned circuit design, you have not done that before. Your
continued unwillingness to provide a reference to one of the many
textbooks that you have said describe your perspective on LC tuned circuit
design, while continuing to make the claim, has made it pretty obvious
that your claims relative to textbook explanations is nothing but BS.
That is not to say that your observations are BS, I unraveled that back in
January, it is just the claim that your method may be found in textbooks
that smacks of BS.

I suggest yet again you satisfy your curiosity to inform yourself of the
wonderments we see with LC tuned circuits by reading whatever books exist
on the subjects, and I am sure there is a pile of material on the web.

Yes, I have several books on my bookshelf that explain the "wonderments we
see with LC tuned circuits", that is not a problem, but they explain
methods that are quite different from yours, I am simply looking for a
reference that will more fully explain your methods than what I have been
able to figure out on my own, especially from a quantitative perspective.

Sadly the answer to my question has become crystal clear.


Regards,

John Byrns


Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/