Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bill" wrote:
Having done some DX'ing with a small Sony SW radio for ten years, I would like to buy a better one, connected to the pc. I was thinking of the Ten-Tech RX320D. (snip) I considered buying one of those types of shortwave receivers before. However, I changed my mind after weighing all the possible long term implications. A good, well-built, standalone receiver can be useful over many years. Indeed, among my radios, I have a twenty-five year old Kenwood that is still performing like a champ. A computer-based receiver, on the other hand, is clearly dependant on the computer for continued use. Given the speed in which computer technology advances and today's technology becomes obsolete, a computer-based receiver clearly has a limited lifespan. Further, after a lessor number of years, when a new OS has replaced the OS needed to operate the receiver's software, any resale value would be sharply reduced. Of course, one can hope the receiver's manufacturer will release new software as operating systems change, but even they will eventually drop this model with a newer receiver with support for older models eventually ended. I'm not trying to talk you out of buying that receiver (since I don't know you, I have no real interest in what you buy). Instead, I just wanted to add this to the general discussion of this newsgroup. Stewart |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew |