Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have no first hand info on this unit. (I was thinking it was a
scanner.) :-) But you may want to read a review at http://www.ticon.net/~n9ewo/ar7030.html before deciding on this unit. There seems to have been a tuning knob problem and some cheap parts used. Al ================ Mark wrote: As the price difference would imply, the AOR AR-7030 is quite a different radio from the ICF-2010. If you are only interested in listening to broadcast, AM, shortwave( is this what you mean by "talk radio"), then the 2010 may be amply suitable for this purpose. On the other hand, if you want, and can, put up a decent antenna or two, and chase more exotic (DX) and utility type stuff, then the AR-7030 is the more capable radio, as I understand. (The ICF2010 doesn't do too bad in this regard either!). Mark. "aristotle" wrote in message om... I am new to short wave radio and would like to know what is the difference in buying a Sony 2010 radio for around $500 as compared to an AOR AR-7030+ for $1600. Money is not the object, listening ability is. I am hooked on listening to talk radio and thoroughly enjoy learning about world events. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Al Patrick wrote:
I have no first hand info on this unit. (I was thinking it was a scanner.) :-) But you may want to read a review at http://www.ticon.net/~n9ewo/ar7030.html before deciding on this unit. There seems to have been a tuning knob problem and some cheap parts used. Al ================ I've had a 7030+ for a few years. The flip side of the "review" you provided a link to is AOR is exceptionally good about getting back to owners who have problems, and they've updated the design to replace parts with reliability issues. The build quality on the 7030 is actually quite good, and as far as I know, Bournes has a reputation for quality encoders - it's just AOR apparently got stuck with some bad ones. Later versions of the firmware for the radio have addressed the keybounce problems on the and keys. My primary complaint about the 7030+ is the standard filters were "too wide" or "too narrow" for my tastes. I added a couple of milspec filters better suited to my preferences, and now I get beautiful audio with great selectivity. It's very close to what I get from my Harris. A strong point of the 7030 is it's practical to run one from nimh battery packs for transportable use. Much more convenient than hauling the 6790/gm I used to use for camping. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Al Patrick" wrote in message
... I have no first hand info on this unit. (I was thinking it was a scanner.) :-) But you may want to read a review at http://www.ticon.net/~n9ewo/ar7030.html before deciding on this unit. There seems to have been a tuning knob problem and some cheap parts used. Al It certainly is good of you to point out this glaring problem, with your vast experience on the model. another..."I've never had one but I hear they suck.." editorial.. Geez. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|