Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "mike0219116" wrote in message news:z3xUc.7289$ni.5199@okepread01... I have a S350 and it's my "sitting on the back porch with a beer on a nice night radio", but it's no DX machine. The S350 is a single conversion radio and it suffers badly from images as a result. Just to pick nits, there were many single conversion radios which had decent image rejection due to additional stages of RF amplification and tuned circuits. The dual conversion approach became cheaper way to a high performance radio sometime around 1950. However, multiconversion radios will have an extra image for each conversion, not to mention conversion oscillator fundamental and harmonic and IF harmonic birdies. These should be well supressed, but it's entirely possible some schlockmeister will come up with a really cheap multiconversion radio that's a total nightmare. Frank Dresser |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
Gene Scott, satellites and MW | Dx | |||
Satellites and amateur radio | General |