In article ,
ospam (Michael Bryant) wrote:

From: "Burr"

So the "Swift" boat people are telling it like it is. Almost all of the
medal recommendation were doctored up.


Actually, only one of those sift boat people was an eyewitness and it seems
that his own medals were based on the same "doctoring up." Today, other
captains that were there say that Kerry is right.

There's tons more believable evidence that Bush was AWOL....

Comparing the two, Kerry comes out on top, because he had the guts to go to
VN!

You come out on the bottom due to your inability to "sift" through the
facts.

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

--
"Kerry arrived [in Viet Nam] with a strong anti-Vietnam War bias and a self-
serving determination to build a foundation for his political future."
-- Rear Admiral Roy Hoffmann, USN (Ret.), May 4, 2004

In article ,
clifto wrote:

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

The problem I have with this Presidential campaign is that when the
media, Michael Moor or some harebrained celebrity slams Bush you do not
hear a peep out of Kerry, but now that a group of disgruntled Veterans,
that served with him, go after Kerry's Nam record he calls for Bush to
stop it. Typical elitist thinking whereby Kerry wants all the pluses
that go with something but none of the negatives is suppose to touch
him. The negatives are for other people to deal with.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Sun, 22 Aug 2004 04:52:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
clifto wrote:

Telamon wrote:
Why yes, apparently, Kerry had the "guts" to commit war atrocities and
that is what whack-job Mikey looks for in a "leader."

But only a Democrat. If a Republican pours cold water on someone, it's
torture and he should be put to death. But a Democrat who shoots a teenager
in the back and commits war atrocities would make a really good President.

The problem I have with this Presidential campaign is that when the
media, Michael Moor or some harebrained celebrity slams Bush you do not
hear a peep out of Kerry, but now that a group of disgruntled Veterans,
that served with him, go after Kerry's Nam record he calls for Bush to
stop it. Typical elitist thinking whereby Kerry wants all the pluses
that go with something but none of the negatives is suppose to touch
him. The negatives are for other people to deal with.

You have a good point.

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
officers or the system.

"William H. Everhart III" wrote:

On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
top all right.

I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
officers or the system.

Sure he did, if he wrote up fictitious action reports. Officers are supposed
to be 'honest'.

But if one is John Forbes Kerry, well heck, he 'deserved' to get those
medals.

One wouldn't want to get in the way, of a future JFK!

dxAce
A Navy Veteran who will not be voting for John Fraud Kerry.

"William H. Everhart III" wrote in message
...
| On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 23:11:25 GMT, Telamon
| wrote:
|
| I guess we will just leave out the apparent embellishment of the Kerry
| version of war atrocities to get those medals. Yeah that's coming out on
| top all right.
|
| I don't think Kerry gave the medals to himself. Blame his damn
| officers or the system.

Fair enough, consider them blamed.

Now, one question. Okay, two:

1. Where was John Effing Kerrnedy on Christmas Eve and Christmas
Day of 1968? Keep in mind the fact that he says the memory was
"seared" into his mind.

2. Why would anyone vote for a confessed war criminal?

Oh, no, wait, there are three, actually.

3. Are you still choking on your own vomit?

73,

Steve Lawrence
KAØPMD
Burnsville, Minnesota

(NOTE: My email address has only one "dot."
You'll have to edit out the one between the "7"
and the "3" in my email address if you wish to
reply via email)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.740 / Virus Database: 494 - Release Date: 8/16/04