Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Arthur Harris wrote:

So either:

1) Bush sincerely believes Kerry served admirably, or
2) Bush is a liar.

Which is it?

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

dxAce

dxAce wrote:


Harris wrote:

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:

LOL... go look at what Kerry said about Edwards during the primaries...

They were competing for the nomination, and had some differences on some
issues. There were no character attacks.

I guess that depends upon what one would consider a 'character' attack.

Or what the definition of 'is' is.

You Liberal's really crack me up!

Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Come on Artie, play along with me..

Did you not state: "No, Bush seems to have an aversion to war when it involves
him being in harms way".

Did I not ask: "What wars you been in Artie? You ever volunteer for any? You ever
serve in the Armed Forces?".

Do you yourself have an aversion to war if it might involve you in harms way?

On the other point, I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

I'm not surprised that you missed it.

One other thing, Artie, you ever consider changing your callsign? I understand
that those are your initials and all, but don't you feel just a wee bit
uncomfortable when you have say November 2 Ass Hole?

dxAce

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:


Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

Art H.

Harris wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Harris wrote:


Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

I guess you must have been sleeping during the primaries. You
certainly missed the character attacks by Kerry against Edwards and Edwards
against Kerry.

OK, refresh my memory. Cite one or two of those character attacks.

Whoa.. you can't go look it up yourself?

It's out there Artie... go look it up. I realise you damn Lib's are pretty lazy,
always wanting someone else to do the work when you're in a hard spot, right?

dxAce



Art H.

Harris wrote:
Again, you give no specifics. What character attacks did Kerry make
against Edwards? You're the one who raised this issue.

Kerry said Edwards was in diapers while he was in Viet Nam.

Kerry said Edwards was trying to align himself with a "protectionist
point of view," accusing him of exploiting the trade issue on the
campaign trail. Edwards "has talked more in the last five weeks about
trade than he has in the last five years," Kerry said.

Kerry made it a point to emphasize that Edwards had "far less experience"
in the Senate.

--
If Kerry can't cope with the "Republican Attack Machine",
how can he hope to deal with Al Qaeda?