|
From: "Lloyd" NoLloyd@nospam
Lest you forget, our country suffered the greatest loss of civilian lives since World War Two. What would you have our President do? Toss in a white flag of surrender as Al Gore would have done? Why not attack some country, then, that had something to do with 9/11? Or is the death of any Muslim good enough for you? Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL Louisville, KY R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K, DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A, Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll, Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76 (remove "nospam" to reply) |
longwave wrote: Dan wrote: On 4 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: "Did Bush lie to us or simply he didn't tell us the truth?" Well, I admit that's a bit of a loaded question, but since the media insists on not using the word "lie"... Neither. We acted on bad information. Slight difference there. Dan One of the most important responsibilities of any president is to question what others tell him. Bush wasn't smart enough to ask the right questions about the intelligence reports. Well, in that case, neither was Kerry. dxAce |
|
In article ,
longwave wrote: Dan wrote: On 4 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: "Did Bush lie to us or simply he didn't tell us the truth?" Well, I admit that's a bit of a loaded question, but since the media insists on not using the word "lie"... Neither. We acted on bad information. Slight difference there. Dan One of the most important responsibilities of any president is to question what others tell him. Bush wasn't smart enough to ask the right questions about the intelligence reports. I think Bush has learned a lesson on accepting what is in intelligence reports. I have certainly learned a lesson on what Kerry would have me believe. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:55:58 GMT, Telamon
wrote: In article , longwave wrote: Dan wrote: On 4 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: "Did Bush lie to us or simply he didn't tell us the truth?" Well, I admit that's a bit of a loaded question, but since the media insists on not using the word "lie"... Neither. We acted on bad information. Slight difference there. Dan One of the most important responsibilities of any president is to question what others tell him. Bush wasn't smart enough to ask the right questions about the intelligence reports. I think Bush has learned a lesson on accepting what is in intelligence reports. I have certainly learned a lesson on what Kerry would have me believe. I'm a Bush supporter but I've got to give Telamon the big wet raspberry. Why would anyone consider your arguments? You only take the "right", republican side - no matter what. Until you can show some objectivity you're just a big idiot. |
In article ,
Kameron Spesial wrote: On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:55:58 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , longwave wrote: Dan wrote: On 4 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: "Did Bush lie to us or simply he didn't tell us the truth?" Well, I admit that's a bit of a loaded question, but since the media insists on not using the word "lie"... Neither. We acted on bad information. Slight difference there. Dan One of the most important responsibilities of any president is to question what others tell him. Bush wasn't smart enough to ask the right questions about the intelligence reports. I think Bush has learned a lesson on accepting what is in intelligence reports. I have certainly learned a lesson on what Kerry would have me believe. I'm a Bush supporter but I've got to give Telamon the big wet raspberry. Why would anyone consider your arguments? You only take the "right", republican side - no matter what. Until you can show some objectivity you're just a big idiot. Well, an idiot might not consider my arguments but any rational person would. You just keep burning your hand on the stove. My choice is to not vote for the guy that lies about Vietnam war and provides support to our enemies. Well, you have just displayed your ignorance and of course made yourself out to look like a moron since I am not a Republican. I have stated here a number of times that I am an independent conservative voter. Now I'll leave it to you to figure out why I will vote for Bush over Kerry. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 22:09:49 GMT, Telamon
wrote: In article , Kameron Spesial wrote: On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 19:55:58 GMT, Telamon wrote: In article , longwave wrote: Dan wrote: On 4 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0700, (DonQuijote1954) wrote: "Did Bush lie to us or simply he didn't tell us the truth?" Well, I admit that's a bit of a loaded question, but since the media insists on not using the word "lie"... Neither. We acted on bad information. Slight difference there. Dan One of the most important responsibilities of any president is to question what others tell him. Bush wasn't smart enough to ask the right questions about the intelligence reports. I think Bush has learned a lesson on accepting what is in intelligence reports. I have certainly learned a lesson on what Kerry would have me believe. I'm a Bush supporter but I've got to give Telamon the big wet raspberry. Why would anyone consider your arguments? You only take the "right", republican side - no matter what. Until you can show some objectivity you're just a big idiot. Well, an idiot might not consider my arguments but any rational person would. You just keep burning your hand on the stove. My choice is to not vote for the guy that lies about Vietnam war and provides support to our enemies. Well, you have just displayed your ignorance and of course made yourself out to look like a moron since I am not a Republican. I have stated here a number of times that I am an independent conservative voter. Now I'll leave it to you to figure out why I will vote for Bush over Kerry. So show us how you hate Bush's immigration stance and his belief that a 7 trillion dollar debt is OK. Be ****ed that he's not a war veteran. It's OK. I understand those things and still support him. But show us a little objectivity once in awhile and maybe the lefties will listen to you now and then. |
"Michael Bryant" wrote in message ... From: "Lloyd" NoLloyd@nospam Lest you forget, our country suffered the greatest loss of civilian lives since World War Two. What would you have our President do? Toss in a white flag of surrender as Al Gore would have done? Why not attack some country, then, that had something to do with 9/11? Or is the death of any Muslim good enough for you? Answer us this Bryant, where is the outrage from the Muslim community about 9/11 and now Russia? Hummmm, silence. |
MnMikew wrote:
where is the outrage from the Muslim community about 9/11 and now Russia? Just because Fox News, Newsmax, and WorldNetDaily didn't report it doesn't mean that it didn't happen: http://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=1620 -- Mike NAR #70953 - Sr/HPR Level-1 ~ BEMRC - NAR Section #627 NO Junk Email, please! Real email to: amphoto [at] blarg [dot] net. WANTED: Experienced Kamikaze Pilot |
"Mike Pearson see .sig" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: where is the outrage from the Muslim community about 9/11 and now Russia? Just because Fox News, Newsmax, and WorldNetDaily didn't report it doesn't mean that it didn't happen: http://www.masnet.org/news.asp?id=1620 Big deal. Time for action. Time for the so-called moderate Muslims to step up to the plate and do something about it. They need to establish a TIT line (turn in terrorists) like we have TIP (turn in poachers). :-) |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com