Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello:
Anyone care to compare the pros and cons of the JRC NRD 545 (several years old by now) vs the new AR 5000 ? Which would you get ? Thanks, Bob |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Robert11" wrote: Hello: Anyone care to compare the pros and cons of the JRC NRD 545 (several years old by now) vs the new AR 5000 ? Which would you get ? The NRD 545. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
says... Hello: Anyone care to compare the pros and cons of the JRC NRD 545 (several years old by now) vs the new AR 5000 ? Which would you get ? Thanks, Bob They dont really compare, the 545 is much better on SW. The 5000 most directly compares to the Icom R-8500. http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...rxvr/1850.html If you want to go with a "DC to Light" type radio, I would pick the 8500 over the 5000, mostly for ease of use, and it is built like a tank. BDK |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I had an AOR AR5000 that I bought used and sold for what I bought it for.
They are a great receiver for scanning. I bought the optional CTCSS board. I can't really speak to the performance below 30 mHz. If you want a high end scanner, don't care about the lack of DPL decoder, buy the AR5000 and the optional CTCSS decoder. If you need trunk-tracking and some of the other high end features, buy a Uniden Bearcat BC796 and then a separate shortwave radio. Needless to say, one of the shortcomings of an all-in-one receiver is you can only monitor one signal at a time. Do you plan on scanning below 30 mHz or tuning in shortwave broadcasts? The Icom IC-8500 may be an okay job, but it cannot be fitted with a CTCSS board. I also know of some people that just go out and buy an amateur transceiver, but just use the receiver portion. I don't know if any of those have all the features you need, but there are some sound to light transceivers that do pretty well. Jim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't have any experience with the AR 5000 but I do have an AOR scanner
(an old AR 1500 which is still superb!). However, for HF listening, I would go for the NRD-545. In fact I did, I received it four days ago. So far, I'm blown away, a fabulous radio. Mark. "BDK" wrote in message ... In article , says... Hello: Anyone care to compare the pros and cons of the JRC NRD 545 (several years old by now) vs the new AR 5000 ? Which would you get ? Thanks, Bob |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was faced with this same choice about a month ago and I went with the 545
with the VHF/UHF converter that goes up to 1.99GHz (with cellular frequencies blocked). I'm happy with my decision since it does well on HF and it seems to be fairly sensitive above 30MHz. I paired this receiver with a AOR discone. There really isn't much to listen to around here above 900MHz, but it's nice to have that coverage "just in case". ![]() however, has the scan speed of a dead turtle, IMHO. I have an Icom R-20 that goes a little above 3GHz that I use as my main scanning unit. "Robert11" wrote in message ... Hello: Anyone care to compare the pros and cons of the JRC NRD 545 (several years old by now) vs the new AR 5000 ? Which would you get ? Thanks, Bob |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA - NYE VIKING RFM-005 RF POWER MONITOR, 5000 watt | Boatanchors | |||
FA - NYE VIKING RFM-005 RF POWER MONITOR, 5000 watt | Boatanchors | |||
Kenwood 5000...Symptoms | Shortwave | |||
Urgent: 5000 Euro Reward | Scanner | |||
Wilson 5000 testing? | CB |