Dwight Stewart wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:
(snip) As such, the only thing Kerry
has done wrong, in my opinion, is not
telling all those asking for this
information to go to hell.


Well he is asking for my vote so
Kerry can go to hell as far as I'm
concerned.

Well, that is hardly a surprise. Based on your prior messages in this
newsgroup, you wouldn't vote for Kerry even if God came down tonight and
told you to do so. Therefore, Kerry wouldn't get your vote if he released
more information, no matter what that information might say. The same is
probably true for most others in this newsgroup ranting about info not being
released.

God would NEVER tell anyone to vote for Kerry. God is smarter than that.

dxAce

"dxAce" wrote:

But wouldn't stepping forward
and providing the info be a
coup for him. (snip)


Nope. The information released so far has either been picked apart for
anything, no matter how vague, to support conspiracy theories or entirely
ignored when nothing to support a conspiracy theory could be found.
Therefore, the release of any more information, assuming it exists (and I'm
not sure it does), is a complete waste of time and even downright
counter-productive.

Stewart

In article . net,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote:
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:
(snip) As such, the only thing Kerry
has done wrong, in my opinion, is not
telling all those asking for this
information to go to hell.


Well he is asking for my vote so
Kerry can go to hell as far as I'm
concerned.


Well, that is hardly a surprise. Based on your prior messages in this
newsgroup, you wouldn't vote for Kerry even if God came down tonight and
told you to do so. Therefore, Kerry wouldn't get your vote if he released
more information, no matter what that information might say. The same is
probably true for most others in this newsgroup ranting about info not being
released.

Nice evasion tactic.

If Kerry's Senate record sucks regardless so it would not matter to
anyone of conscience.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article et,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote:

You'd think if his attendance at
the closed meetings was good,
he'd be anxious to take away
the argument. (snip)


No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information
which nobody else involved in all this is providing.

You wrote that sentence wrong. Let me fix it for you.

"No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information
where everyone else involved in this has already provided it."

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article . net,
"Dwight Stewart" wrote:

"dxAce" wrote:

But wouldn't stepping forward
and providing the info be a
coup for him. (snip)


Nope. The information released so far has either been picked apart for
anything, no matter how vague, to support conspiracy theories or entirely
ignored when nothing to support a conspiracy theory could be found.
Therefore, the release of any more information, assuming it exists (and I'm
not sure it does), is a complete waste of time and even downright
counter-productive.

That right Dwight, Kerry is the disparager and not the subject of
anyones scrutiny.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Dwight Stewart wrote:

"Mark S. Holden" wrote:

You'd think if his attendance at
the closed meetings was good,
he'd be anxious to take away
the argument. (snip)

No, I think he is just darn tired of being asked to provide information
which nobody else involved in all this is providing.

Stewart

I think if he had a good answer, he'd be giving it.

If you're applying for a job, you don't duck a question unless the answer will hurt you.

On 1 Sep 2004 07:12:39 -0500, Dan wrote:


Since you're obviously new here - and a dumb **** besides...
Dan

NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the
right.

h.
_________________________________________
Zazen is good for nothing! - Sawaki Roshi

From: homeless

NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the
right.

By and large, most of the conservative political posters in this NG couldn't
find a SINGLE Republican that would support their perspectives or behaviors.

Now, Ann Coulter is a dog of a different color....


Michael Bryant, WA4009SWL
Louisville, KY
R75, S800, RX320, SW77, ICF2010K,
DX398, 7600G, 6800W, RF2200, 7600A,
Degen 1102, Degen 1103, GE SRll,
Pro-2006, Pro-2010, Pro-76
(remove "nospam" to reply)

"Michael Bryant" wrote in message
...
From: homeless

NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the
right.

By and large, most of the conservative political posters in this NG
couldn't
find a SINGLE Republican that would support their perspectives or
behaviors.

Yet another idiotic statement by the master himself.

Michael Bryant wrote:

From: homeless

NB the Coulter-style family values we should come to expect from the
right.

By and large, most of the conservative political posters in this NG couldn't
find a SINGLE Republican that would support their perspectives or behaviors.

Any politician that supported such extreme positions and behavior would
have a short career these days.


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----