Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Grumpus" wrote Hi, I'm very curious about the Eavesdropper-T and Eavesdropper-C dipoles (see Universal-Radio online catalog) for my attic. The Eavesdropper-T is a trapped dipole center-fed with 100' of 72 ohm balanced feedline. The Eavesdropper-C is identical except it includes a coax fitting and does not include a lead-in cable. Both models are 43' long (ideal for my attic space) and include static arrestors. For the first thirty feet of my attic, there is electrical wiring to the lights running 3'-4' from the peak of the roof, and for the last ten feet within a foot of the peak. My questions are will this antenna mounted at the very peak of the attic: 1. Be safe from lightning strikes? 2. Increase the chances of frying my radios even if electrocution is not an issue? 3. Suffer interference from the electrical wiring described above whether the lights are on or off? 4. Or interference from the utility lines outside the house which run both parallel and perpendicular to the proposed antenna 15' to the side and 10' below? 5. Need to be grounded? (I believe I have read somewhere that a balanced dipole does not need to be grounded in order to deliver an acceptable low-noise signal. Is this wrong?) What I have in mind, especially if I don't need to ground the antenna, is moving my shack up to the attic and listening to DX on long winter nights with a jug of corn liquor to keep me warm. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Grumpus Slinky dipole (currently unused) Radio Shack discone antenna (for scanner) All in attic of my house Good morning - Antenna wiring in your attic is as safe from lighting as any other wiring in your house. That is, it is subject to electro-magnetic induction from nearby strikes the same as your home wiring is. So-called static arrestors that are not rated for several thousand amps and low impedance grounded to a good lightning protection system...may be useful in limiting some static, but not the kind from either near or far field lightning energy. If you have nearby trees that are prone to being struck, recommend you not leave antennas connected to your radios during storms. Nearby home wiring should not affect your attic antenna, but the reverse is not true. You may couple to the wiring if your transmit. A dipole antenna does not use an RF-transmitter ground for its operation. If a dipole is not high enough (at least 1/4 wavelength above ground) then there will be losses to the ground, in this case through your home, when transmitting. This has no effect on reception. Be advised that setting up ops in your attic will limit your ability to safely operate in the future, should you decide to utilize external antennas. There is no easy or safe way to properly ground a second story radio station. Many amatuer operators and hobbyists may run this way, but disconnecting all outside antenna *outside* the home is a requirement before thunderstorms in that condition. There is no practical or inexpensive way to maintain a lightning protection system for connected external antennas when the radio station is more than a few feet above earth-ground potential. Best regards, Jack Painter Virginia Beach VA |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jack Painter wrote: "Grumpus" wrote Hi, I'm very curious about the Eavesdropper-T and Eavesdropper-C dipoles (see Universal-Radio online catalog) for my attic. The Eavesdropper-T is a trapped dipole center-fed with 100' of 72 ohm balanced feedline. The Eavesdropper-C is identical except it includes a coax fitting and does not include a lead-in cable. Both models are 43' long (ideal for my attic space) and include static arrestors. For the first thirty feet of my attic, there is electrical wiring to the lights running 3'-4' from the peak of the roof, and for the last ten feet within a foot of the peak. My questions are will this antenna mounted at the very peak of the attic: 1. Be safe from lightning strikes? 2. Increase the chances of frying my radios even if electrocution is not an issue? 3. Suffer interference from the electrical wiring described above whether the lights are on or off? 4. Or interference from the utility lines outside the house which run both parallel and perpendicular to the proposed antenna 15' to the side and 10' below? 5. Need to be grounded? (I believe I have read somewhere that a balanced dipole does not need to be grounded in order to deliver an acceptable low-noise signal. Is this wrong?) What I have in mind, especially if I don't need to ground the antenna, is moving my shack up to the attic and listening to DX on long winter nights with a jug of corn liquor to keep me warm. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Grumpus Slinky dipole (currently unused) Radio Shack discone antenna (for scanner) All in attic of my house Good morning - Antenna wiring in your attic is as safe from lighting as any other wiring in your house. That is, it is subject to electro-magnetic induction from nearby strikes the same as your home wiring is. So-called static arrestors that are not rated for several thousand amps and low impedance grounded to a good lightning protection system...may be useful in limiting some static, but not the kind from either near or far field lightning energy. If you have nearby trees that are prone to being struck, recommend you not leave antennas connected to your radios during storms. Nearby home wiring should not affect your attic antenna, but the reverse is not true. You may couple to the wiring if your transmit. A dipole antenna does not use an RF-transmitter ground for its operation. If a dipole is not high enough (at least 1/4 wavelength above ground) then there will be losses to the ground, in this case through your home, when transmitting. This has no effect on reception. I would disagree, the same effects that an antenna has for transmission will also be reflected upon its ability to receive signals. They may not have a great affect, but it will be there, none the less. dxAce Be advised that setting up ops in your attic will limit your ability to safely operate in the future, should you decide to utilize external antennas. There is no easy or safe way to properly ground a second story radio station. Many amatuer operators and hobbyists may run this way, but disconnecting all outside antenna *outside* the home is a requirement before thunderstorms in that condition. There is no practical or inexpensive way to maintain a lightning protection system for connected external antennas when the radio station is more than a few feet above earth-ground potential. Best regards, Jack Painter Virginia Beach VA |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote Jack Painter wrote: Nearby home wiring should not affect your attic antenna, but the reverse is not true. You may couple to the wiring if your transmit. A dipole antenna does not use an RF-transmitter ground for its operation. If a dipole is not high enough (at least 1/4 wavelength above ground) then there will be losses to the ground, in this case through your home, when transmitting. This has no effect on reception. I would disagree, the same effects that an antenna has for transmission will also be reflected upon its ability to receive signals. They may not have a great affect, but it will be there, none the less. dxAce You're correct Steve, and it would not be ideal to deliberately locate a receive antenna closely parallel to AC wiring if some distance was possible. The AC wiring might either reflect and therefore improve reception, or to a smaller degree, absorb some signal. But it would be a much bigger issue in transmit then receive in my opinion. Best regards, Jack |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , sdaniel13
@nyc.rr.com says... I'm always curious about people's antennas, though they often go unmentioned here. So, what's in your back yard (or on your roof, or in your attic....)? Shorty G5RV dipole*, up about two stories, but the ends are folded around a bit in order to keep a low profile. I'm in a condo so the neighbors are a little closer than I would like, so I try not to advertise that I'm a ham. (Operating QRP power levels helps, too.) The antenna does pretty well for tuning around the shortwave bands with my FT-817, too, but I suppose it would be better if I could get it up a bit straighter and slightly higher. For portable listening, like on the beach or in the hotel room, I have a little Grundig wind-up long wire antenna with an alligator clip on the end. Works nicely for stringing up a wire around the room, and the alligator clip (added after purchase) connects well to the built-in whip on my little DX-375 receiver for recreational listening on trips. -- -- //Steve// Steve Silverwood, KB6OJS Fountain Valley, CA Email: *The shortened version doesn't cover below 40m for transmitting, but for shortwave listening it does okay. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why do WiFi basestations use two antennas? | Homebrew | |||
F/A New Motorola VHF portable antennas (Motorola Branded!!) | Scanner | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Shortwave | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |