DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
..
..
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
..

FO&A,

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ?

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ?

Casting Further Doubt - Document Analysts:
CBS News Ignored Concerns About Disputed Bush Military Records
- by Brian Ross ABC News

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/Investigation/bush_guard_documents_040914-1.html

* Two of the document experts hired by CBS News say the network
ignored concerns they raised prior to the broadcast of a report
citing documents that questioned George W. Bush's service in the
National Guard during the Vietnam War.

* Emily Will, a veteran document examiner from North Carolina,
told ABC News she saw problems right away with the one document
CBS hired her to check the weekend before the broadcast.

* "I found five significant differences in the questioned
handwriting, and I found problems with the printing itself as to
whether it could have been produced by a typewriter," she said.

* Will says she sent the CBS producer an e-mail message about
her concerns and strongly urged the network the night before
the broadcast not to use the documents.

* A second document examiner hired by CBS News, Linda James of
Plano, Texas, also told ABC News she had concerns about the
documents and could not authenticate them. She said she expressed
her concerns to CBS before the 60 Minutes II broadcast.

* "I did not authenticate anything and I don't want it to be
misunderstood that I did," James said. "And that's why I have
come forth to talk about it because I don't want anybody to
think I did authenticate these documents."

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
.

In article ,
(RHF) wrote:

FO&A,

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ?

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ?

Snip

60 minutes and Dan both should have known better.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

FO&A,

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

Rather Concedes Papers Are Suspect
CBS Anchor Urges Media to Focus On Bush Service
- by Howard Kurtz - Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 16, 2004; Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Sep15.html

* CBS anchor Dan Rather acknowledged for the first time yesterday
that there are serious questions about the authenticity of the
documents he used to question President Bush's National Guard
record last week on "60 Minutes."

* Rather spoke after interviewing the secretary to Bush's
former squadron commander, who told him that the memos attributed
to her late boss are fake.

* The former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, is the latest person
to raise questions about the "60 Minutes" story, which Rather
and top CBS officials still defend while vowing to investigate
mounting questions about whether the 30-year-old documents used
in the story were part of a hoax.

In her interview with Rather yesterday, Knox repeated her
contention that the documents used by "60 Minutes" were bogus.
Knox, 86, worked for Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian while he supervised
Bush's unit in the early 1970s.

I know that I didn't type them," Knox said of the Killian memos.

Rather said "I take very seriously her belief that the documents
are not authentic."

As Rather signed off to rush back into the studio last night,
he sounded a defiant note. "I try to look people in the eye
and tell them the truth," Rather said. "I don't back up.
I don't back down. I don't cave when the pressure gets too great
from these partisan political ideological forces."

Concerning Marian Carr Knox's Political Leanings.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Sep14.html
Knox, 86, who acknowledged she was not a supporter of the president
- calling him "unfit for office" and "selected, not elected"
- said the typeface on the documents did not match either of
the two typewriters that she used during her time at the guard,
a mechanical Olympia and later an IBM Selectric.

New Doubts on Bush Military Memos - BBC-WN
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3662668.stm

Judge orders Pentagon to find, release all Bush Military Records
http://www.team4news.com/Global/story.asp?S=2311134
The ruling late yesterday out of New York is meant to resolve a
Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by The Associated Press.
QUESTION: So WHY has the AP only Targeted Bush's Military
Records when John 'ff' Kerry has not signed a release to
make poblic his Military Records.
! Looks like Media Bias by the AP !

Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
.

Dan Rather, Bill Burkett do a Re-Assembled Interview
TWD= http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/
- The Washington Dispatch
- 19 September 2004
- by CK Rairden

* CBS News anchor Dan Rather has interviewed the retired
lieutenant colonel widely believed to have helped provide
"60 Minutes" with the disputed National Guard documents about
President Bush that have created a credibility crisis for the
network, and CBS plans to air the interview in the coming days.

* The on-camera sit-down with Bill Burkett, who has urged
Democratic activists to wage "war" against Republican "dirty
tricks," could help resolve whether CBS continues to stand by
its story or concedes the purported 30-year-old memos are
forgeries, as numerous document experts have contended.

* It's difficult to see how this can end in a good way for Dan
Rather and CBS, no matter what Burkett coughs up. He's been
discredited thoroughly with his own writings as any kind of
"source."

* Burkett's comments in an August 25th published rant included,
"[Mr. Bush] I know from your files that we have now reassembled,
{Re-Created - Re-Manufactured} the fact that you did not fulfill
your oath, taken when you were commissioned to "obey the orders
of the officers appointed over you."

just the facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
..

CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.

WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

* According to The Washington Post, the network plans to say
it was misled about the authenticity of the documents.

* The New York Times reports that CBS News officials met Sunday
evening with anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the contested
story, to discuss the network's next steps.

* The Post and Times report that CBS' latest move comes after
Rather met in Texas with Bill Burkett, a former Texas National
Guard official who has been named as a possible source for the
documents.

* It was not clear if the network planned to apologize, the
Post reported.

Just the Facts ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
FO&A,

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

Rather Concedes Papers Are Suspect
CBS Anchor Urges Media to Focus On Bush Service
- by Howard Kurtz - Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, September 16, 2004; Page A01
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Sep15.html

* CBS anchor Dan Rather acknowledged for the first time yesterday
that there are serious questions about the authenticity of the
documents he used to question President Bush's National Guard
record last week on "60 Minutes."

* Rather spoke after interviewing the secretary to Bush's
former squadron commander, who told him that the memos attributed
to her late boss are fake.

* The former secretary, Marian Carr Knox, is the latest person
to raise questions about the "60 Minutes" story, which Rather
and top CBS officials still defend while vowing to investigate
mounting questions about whether the 30-year-old documents used
in the story were part of a hoax.

In her interview with Rather yesterday, Knox repeated her
contention that the documents used by "60 Minutes" were bogus.
Knox, 86, worked for Lt. Col. Jerry B. Killian while he supervised
Bush's unit in the early 1970s.

I know that I didn't type them," Knox said of the Killian memos.

Rather said "I take very seriously her belief that the documents
are not authentic."

As Rather signed off to rush back into the studio last night,
he sounded a defiant note. "I try to look people in the eye
and tell them the truth," Rather said. "I don't back up.
I don't back down. I don't cave when the pressure gets too great
from these partisan political ideological forces."

Concerning Marian Carr Knox's Political Leanings.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...2004Sep14.html
Knox, 86, who acknowledged she was not a supporter of the president
- calling him "unfit for office" and "selected, not elected"
- said the typeface on the documents did not match either of
the two typewriters that she used during her time at the guard,
a mechanical Olympia and later an IBM Selectric.

New Doubts on Bush Military Memos - BBC-WN
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3662668.stm

Judge orders Pentagon to find, release all Bush Military Records
http://www.team4news.com/Global/story.asp?S=2311134
The ruling late yesterday out of New York is meant to resolve a
Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by The Associated Press.
QUESTION: So WHY has the AP only Targeted Bush's Military
Records when John 'ff' Kerry has not signed a release to
make poblic his Military Records.
! Looks like Media Bias by the AP !

Just the Facts ~ RHF
.
.
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart

..

RHF wrote:

CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.

WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

* According to The Washington Post, the network plans to say
it was misled about the authenticity of the documents.

* The New York Times reports that CBS News officials met Sunday
evening with anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the contested
story, to discuss the network's next steps.

* The Post and Times report that CBS' latest move comes after
Rather met in Texas with Bill Burkett, a former Texas National
Guard official who has been named as a possible source for the
documents.

* It was not clear if the network planned to apologize, the
Post reported.

CBS can't be trusted in any of this, no matter what they say at this point in time.

They, and Dan Blather were warned about the documents before they went to air with
them. Then they tried a bit of CYA, that didn't work, now they are falling back on
this story.

dxAce

RHF wrote:

CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.

WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

* According to The Washington Post, the network plans to say
it was misled about the authenticity of the documents.

* The New York Times reports that CBS News officials met Sunday
evening with anchor Dan Rather, the reporter of the contested
story, to discuss the network's next steps.

* The Post and Times report that CBS' latest move comes after
Rather met in Texas with Bill Burkett, a former Texas National
Guard official who has been named as a possible source for the
documents.

* It was not clear if the network planned to apologize, the
Post reported.

Burkett apparently gave the documents to CBS. But who gave them to Burkett?

Someone in the Kerry Kampaign?

Kerry is toast.

dxAce

CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
Statement from Dan Rather - Misled - Mistake - I Am Sorry
{ But NO Apology to President George "W" Bush }
SOURCE= http://www.drudgereport.com/
..
WHY WON'T DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO PRESIDENT BUSH AND HIS FAMILY ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
WHY WON'T CBS NEWS APOLOGIZE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
..
Where's the Apology Dan ? ~ RHF
..
..
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
Dan Rather, Bill Burkett do a Re-Assembled Interview
TWD= http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/
- The Washington Dispatch
- 19 September 2004
- by CK Rairden

* CBS News anchor Dan Rather has interviewed the retired
lieutenant colonel widely believed to have helped provide
"60 Minutes" with the disputed National Guard documents about
President Bush that have created a credibility crisis for the
network, and CBS plans to air the interview in the coming days.

* The on-camera sit-down with Bill Burkett, who has urged
Democratic activists to wage "war" against Republican "dirty
tricks," could help resolve whether CBS continues to stand by
its story or concedes the purported 30-year-old memos are
forgeries, as numerous document experts have contended.

* It's difficult to see how this can end in a good way for Dan
Rather and CBS, no matter what Burkett coughs up. He's been
discredited thoroughly with his own writings as any kind of
"source."

* Burkett's comments in an August 25th published rant included,
"[Mr. Bush] I know from your files that we have now reassembled,
{Re-Created - Re-Manufactured} the fact that you did not fulfill
your oath, taken when you were commissioned to "obey the orders
of the officers appointed over you."

just the facts ~ RHF
.
.
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
.

On 20 Sep 2004 11:07:12 -0700, (RHF) wrote:

CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
Statement from Dan Rather - Misled - Mistake - I Am Sorry
{ But NO Apology to President George "W" Bush }
SOURCE= http://www.drudgereport.com/
.
WHY WON'T DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO PRESIDENT BUSH AND HIS FAMILY ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
WHY WON'T CBS NEWS APOLOGIZE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
CBS Plans New Memos Statement
NEW YORK, 20 SEPT 2004
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/...in641481.shtml

CBS HAS NOT REVEALED WHO PROVIDED THE DOCUMENTS OR HOW THEY WERE OBTAINED.
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
WHO IS CBS PROTECTING ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}
- - - CBS = Clearly "BS" !
.
Where's the Apology Dan ? ~ RHF
.
.
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
Dan Rather, Bill Burkett do a Re-Assembled Interview
TWD= http://www.washingtondispatch.com/page2/
- The Washington Dispatch
- 19 September 2004
- by CK Rairden

* CBS News anchor Dan Rather has interviewed the retired
lieutenant colonel widely believed to have helped provide
"60 Minutes" with the disputed National Guard documents about
President Bush that have created a credibility crisis for the
network, and CBS plans to air the interview in the coming days.

* The on-camera sit-down with Bill Burkett, who has urged
Democratic activists to wage "war" against Republican "dirty
tricks," could help resolve whether CBS continues to stand by
its story or concedes the purported 30-year-old memos are
forgeries, as numerous document experts have contended.

* It's difficult to see how this can end in a good way for Dan
Rather and CBS, no matter what Burkett coughs up. He's been
discredited thoroughly with his own writings as any kind of
"source."

* Burkett's comments in an August 25th published rant included,
"[Mr. Bush] I know from your files that we have now reassembled,
{Re-Created - Re-Manufactured} the fact that you did not fulfill
your oath, taken when you were commissioned to "obey the orders
of the officers appointed over you."

just the facts ~ RHF
.
.
= = = (RHF) wrote in message
= = = . com...
DS,

You are smart than this. With the 'right' Computer and Software
any "IMAGE" (Text Document) can be created for under $5K.

In the "Old Document" 're-manufacturing' business there are
Devise Emulator Programs that will give you IBM Selectric Composer,
an old Soviet Military Typewriter, or what ever is needed to
create the proper image.

The 'use' of a "Photo Copy" of a ?document? is the easiest way
of MASKING the mechanical impressions left by (or not left by)
a Typewriter; the type of Paper-Stock & Water-Marks; and the
Inks & Dyes in the 'base' {Fake} Document.

NOTE: The Black 'ghost' Image Marks produced by the Photo
Copier can act as a Finger Print to Identify the "Actual"
Photo-Copier used to make the ?documents? .

The QUESTION Becomes "WHO" provided these 'manufactured'
?documents? for 60 Minutes.

60 Minutes needs to 'come clean' with the American People.

60 Minutes needs to Identify the "Source" of the Forged Documents.

60 Minutes is Stone Walling the Search for the Truth with a
so called 'investigation'. Some now call this "DOC-U-GATE".

Failing to do so simply means that 60 Minutes is part of this
Criminal Conspircy to present these Fake Documents as real.

WHAT - Did 60 Minutes Know ? {about the Forged Documents}

WHEN - Did Dan Rather Know It ? {about these Fake Documents}

HOW - Is 60 Minutes 'involvement' in/with these Forged Documents ?

WHY - Has 60 Minutes Not Acted to Tell the Truth ?
{about these Forged 'Fake' Documents}

So What's the Frequency {Now} Dan ?

Just the Facts in Search of the Truth ~ RHF
.
.
= = = "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
= = = hlink.net...
"-=jd=-" wrote:

Where the misalignment occurs, the tops
of the characters seem to be consistent
where the bottom is truncated and
vice-versa. (snip)


Not at all. For example, in the example given, the "ee" in "three months"
is clearly raised above the surrounding text (the entire characters,
including the tops and bottoms). That is typical of a heavily worn
typewriter, not a computer.

Stewart
.

Calm down dude. Everything is not a conspiracy. And in this case,
although the docs are not authentic - the message is. So cool your
old jets. You can release the caps lock. Hey - the CIA was wrong
about WMA - maybe a lie? MAYBE A LIE RHF!!!!! AAAAHAA!!! SOMEONE
IS LYING TO US RHF - ROAST 'EM HIGH! YOU AND ME DUDE!!!!