This puts it in prospective!!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/22/op...22safi.html?th


--
Burr

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican
Phu Bai/Hue, Da Nang
voteyoursport.com

Yop.

CBS shouldn't have shown the documents if they couldn't show the original
source.
& you don't say " Rumor Has It" & report it as news..

As an example,
Woodward & Bernstein had 2 sources for every item in " All The Presidents men "

& IF someone broke the law, then someone should look into it.

BUT
Question still remains;

- Who saw GWB at Air National Guard in Alabama; ?

Someone from a poor family not showing up for duty would have been thrown in
The Brig; Right...?

Dan / NYC


....
In article Pqf4d.9834$464.9562@trnddc01, "Burr" writes:


This puts it in prospective!!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/22/op...22safi.html?th


--
Burr

Vote "RIGHT"
Vote Republican
Phu Bai/Hue, Da Nang
voteyoursport.com

"Diverd4777" wrote in message
...
Yop.

CBS shouldn't have shown the documents if they couldn't show the
original
source.
& you don't say " Rumor Has It" & report it as news..

As an example,
Woodward & Bernstein had 2 sources for every item in " All The
Presidents men "

& IF someone broke the law, then someone should look into it.

BUT
Question still remains;

- Who saw GWB at Air National Guard in Alabama; ?

Actually, that's the problem. The appropriate question is who can
prove GWB did -not- fulifill his responsibilities.

Someone from a poor family not showing up for duty would have been
thrown in
The Brig; Right...?


Very possibly, but irrelevant until you can prove that he did not show
up for duty and that his honorable discharge is, in effect,
fraudulent.

Ever wonder why this whole issue was given a big yawn by Al Gore in
2000? He wasn;t as desperate.

"T. Early" wrote:

"Diverd4777" wrote in message
...
Yop.

CBS shouldn't have shown the documents if they couldn't show the
original
source.
& you don't say " Rumor Has It" & report it as news..

As an example,
Woodward & Bernstein had 2 sources for every item in " All The
Presidents men "

& IF someone broke the law, then someone should look into it.

BUT
Question still remains;

- Who saw GWB at Air National Guard in Alabama; ?

Actually, that's the problem. The appropriate question is who can
prove GWB did -not- fulifill his responsibilities.

Someone from a poor family not showing up for duty would have been
thrown in
The Brig; Right...?


Very possibly, but irrelevant until you can prove that he did not show
up for duty and that his honorable discharge is, in effect,
fraudulent.

Ever wonder why this whole issue was given a big yawn by Al Gore in
2000? He wasn;t as desperate.

One of the things that a lot of folks do not understand is how the National
Guard operated back then at least. One could skip all kinds of weekends of duty,
as long as that time was made up. There was no AWOL or desertion of any kind, as
long as that time was made up. And by all accounts, GWB made up those hours of
duty, whether it was piloting a plane, or shuffling paper, or just being in a
certain place for a specified time.

That's just the way it was.

Get over it folks.

dxAce

(Diverd4777) wrote in message ...
Yop.

CBS shouldn't have shown the documents if they couldn't show the original
source.
& you don't say " Rumor Has It" & report it as news..

As an example,
Woodward & Bernstein had 2 sources for every item in " All The Presidents men "

& IF someone broke the law, then someone should look into it.

BUT
Question still remains;

- Who saw GWB at Air National Guard in Alabama; ?

Someone from a poor family not showing up for duty would have been thrown in
The Brig; Right...?

Dan / NYC

thrown in tNot really. I was middle clase and several friends, or
their older brothers, went the NG route to avoid an all expense paid
trip to the summer war games. And 2 failed to complete their NG
obligation. No trial, no questions. And after they received normal
discharges. I am not an expert on types of discharges, but one went on
to become a LEO. I supect that the being "thrown in the brigg" was
seldom used.
How many NG or ANG trooppies who just stopped reporting experienced
negative outcomes? I don't knwo and have no way to even begin to
find answeres.
To show that GWBII really benifited from unfair influence, it will
help your case to show some NG/ANG types who were "thrown in the
brigg", then you will have demonstrated the unfairness of his actions
and outcome. I will admit that
my sample is way to small, and in another state to be real meaning.
Terry

= = = "Burr" wrote in message
= = = news:Pqf4d.9834$464.9562@trnddc01...

This puts it in prospective!!!!!

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/22/op...22safi.html?th

BURR,

YES IT IS A CRIME and there should be a Criminal Investigation [.]

We Need a Congressional Investigation of C.B.S. and Dan Rather.

* "What should CBS do Now ?"
- Clearly "BS" is Stone Walling with a 'phony' investigation.

* "First, release Rather's interview with Burkett in its entirety;
viewers are entitled to the outtakes now."
- NOT Going to Happen - Clearly "BS" only believes in one thing.
'The Public Has The Right To Know - That Which We Tell Them.'

* "Next, let Mary Mapes, at the center of all this, speak to reporters."
- NOT Going to Happen - She Will TELL ALL - Only 'if'
Clearly "BS" Fires Her - Therefore Clearly "BS" Can NOT FIRE Her.

* "Third, expend some Viacom resources to track down the possible
original sources, including the man whose name Burkett says he
"threw out" to mislead CBS."
- Clearly "BS" has put together a SHOW 'phony' investigation to
get them through and beyond the Elections. Just one more example
of why their are Clearly "BS".

- - - - - R A N T - - - - -

WHAT IS THERE TO INVESTIGATE: The Trail-of-Evidence is Clear:
The "KERRY" Connection ! John 'ff' Kerry Campaign Joe Lockhart
Bill Burkett Dan Rather-Gate

UNDERSTAND: Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} still claim that
the FACTS are True and 'only' that the Documents are ?questionable?

THEREFO Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} feel they do not
need to "Apologize" to the Killian Family and to President Bush
and his Family.

REALITY: Dan Rather and C.B.S. {Clearly BS} are worng, Wrong. WRONG !

WHY WON'T CBS AND DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO THE KILLIAN FAMILY ?

WHY WON'T CBS AND DAN RATHER APOLOGIZE TO PRESIDENT BUSH AN HIS FAMILY ?

~ RHF
..
..