Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Isaiah Beard" wrote in message ... Doug Kanter wrote: I use SprintPCS with a 4 year old Motorola StarTac ST7867. Just moved to a new house and I can barely get a signal unless I stand in the middle of the yard. That's problematic in winter. After grilling a couple of customer service reps on the phone, I stopped into the Sprint store today and came away with some questions I need answered before I terminate my service and try another provider 1) The salesman was the first Sprint employee I've found who was actually able to show me the actual location of antennas. There's one a mile from my home, and 2 others within 5 miles, with no obstructions of any kind. No hills, no tall buildings, just trees and homes. He says this explains nothing because he signal is highly directional. True or false? Resoundly True. Cell sites use directional antennae... in fact in an area where buildout is mature, they sort of have to. Cell sites, even those that operate on CDMA as Sprint does, are sectorized to reduce interference with neighboring cells on different pilot signals. 2) His next suggestion was (of course) to try a newer phone because mine uses "older technology" which might not be able to pick up such a great signal. Likely or not? Actually, very likely. The 7867 is a 5 year old design at least, and the network has changed quite a bit since then. The carriers have worked to squeeze more capacity out of the network, and in CDMA that means a generally higher signal to noise ratio (in CDMA, all other conversations happening on the same channel are "noise" to your particular handset), and thus greater tolerance requirements for a higher noise floor. This has forced chipmakers (mainly Qualcomm) to come up with better, more sensitive RF stages for newer handsets. The result is your old phone will still work with the present network, but not as well as it did four years ago even in the best of circumstances. If you put a current-model Sanyo side by side with your StarTAC, the Sanyo will probably receive a better signal nearly all of the time. 3) Here's the tricky part: I'm not totally adverse to a newer phone, even though I have absolutely NO need for color, email, songs, games, digital pictures, or any other crap. I just need a friggin' phone. But, I've made an observation over the past few years while listening to the sound quality when people call me from THEIR phones. It seems that some manufacturers have gone WAY off the deep end when designing their noise cancelling arrangements. In many instances, background noise causes the phone to also kill or scramble the voice of the user. This, of course, makes the phone useless. I make quite a few calls from my boat in high winds, and people tell me that as long as I'm manually dealing with the wind somehow (turning away, etc), the phone sounds like a normal phone as opposed to some sort of special effects in a B-movie. Yeah, a casualty of the need to squeeze capacity is sound quality. Vocoder ("VOice enCODER") bitrates have gone down, and that means your StarTAC which uses a 13kbps vocoder will sound better than the 8kpbs/variable-rate vocoder on today's phones. However, some phone manufacturers are still better than others. A lot of people (including myself) swear by the Sanyo models. Samsungs aren't all that great, and the jury is still out on LG. Of course nothing, not even a StarTAC, beats the sound quality on the original Qualcom QCP-2700s that Sprint first started out with back in 1996. I had one and could swear that phone sounded as good, and sometimes even better, than a landline. It was small and light, and it was solidly built... if you smashed the 2700 against a brick, my bet would be that the phone would win and the brick would lose. Sadly, none of that is true with current phones from any wireless carrier these days. Before jumping ship, I would give the Sanyo 4920 a try. It's the descendant of the 4900, which Sprint users have been raving about for a while as being the best phone (of current models, anyway) for call quality and for holding a signal. -- E-mail fudged to thwart spammers. Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply. Thanks, Isaiah, for the specific phone model tips. The guy at the Sprint store pointed out a Sanyo. Years ago, I was in the car audio business, selling AND installing what I sold. Sanyos were hideous. Absolutely atrocious. We used to warn customers 10 times to keep the knobs & faceplate very clean for the first week because they'd be back to exchange the units for something real. 9 out of 10 people came back. So, my stomach turned when he mentioned Sanyo, but my experience goes back 15 years. I'll take another look. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Info | |||
very irronic: cell phone eavesdropping & old tv sets | Scanner | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Phone line as SW antenna [04-Apr-00] | Shortwave |