Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan Say wrote in message news:clmqmm$ik4
Countries are finding that none of their nationals are listening, Germans not listening to DW, Brits not listening to BBCWS etc. So the most important self-market is lost. Is that actually true? I can think of several fellow British people who have reason to be abroad reguarly every year who rely on the BBC World Service to hear news not only from their home broadcaster, but also British news. This is the same for friends who just go on holiday for a few weeks. Sure, BBC World and Prime may be available in their hotel rooms abroad but thats all international perspective. Many international broadcasters still recognise foreign nationals and ex-pats as being important. Although Radio Vlaanderen Internationaal are killing the majority of their output, what will be left of the Flemish service apparently has one sole target area. South and South East Europe. Where most Belgians go on vacation. International SW broadcasting still has various purposes, IMO: * As mentioned above - nationals abroad. No one else is going to serve them. * International news for an international audience. If BBC World is going to exist happily on TV, why shouldn't BBC World Service on radio? I'll hold back on dozens of other examples * As you say, serving rural areas, freedom-suppressed regions. It's more important than just building diplomacy though, some people depend on SW as a lifeline, the ONLY way they can get any sort of real news and education. If people are turning away from shortwave (of which there is no doubt), a big part of that will be the technology. SW used to be good enough. But AM broadcasting on SW is ancient. Satellite sounds much better. Even low-bitrate net streams sound a damn sight better than a distant SW transmission. That's where DRM is going to be crucial. It's going to make international broadcasting listenable again, attractive again. It will have the advantages of satellite and internet radio as far as audio quality is concerned, with all the portability of REAL radio. And theres no doubt that in a short space of time, DRM receivers will become affordable in poorer areas of the world. It's shortsighted to write off DRM so soon. It must be given a chance. Stephen H |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|