Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 30th 04, 11:04 AM
Conan Ford
 
Posts: n/a
Default ARRL editorial on BPL

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2004/10/29/1/

excerpt
"If anyone doubts the legitimacy of the interference issue, consider this.
To protect aeronautical communications, the new rules establish numerous
frequency bands that BPL must entirely avoid. If the interference isn’t
real, why did the NTIA insist that the FCC take this step? Why do the new
rules establish exclusion zones and consultation requirements to protect
federal government, public safety, and certain other stations? We’re
looking forward to reading the Report and Order to find out whether the FCC
will require coordination around its own field offices, as the NTIA
thoughtfully proposed on their behalf."

The editorial is, of course, concerned with HAM issues and not with
shortwave listening.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL and the local scene KØHB Policy 3 May 17th 04 02:30 AM
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! NIW Policy 0 March 23rd 04 10:29 PM
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) Twistedhed CB 0 August 20th 03 03:57 PM
ARRL FUD about BPL Jake Brodsky Shortwave 0 August 19th 03 08:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017