"Gray Shockley" wrote
I started paying attention to the "high-voltage cancer, especially on
children" argument about thirty years ago and both "sides" have proved
their
arguments innumerable times (to their own satisfaction, anyway).

The courts have never recognized the phony "evidence" presented by claimants
attempting to link cancer to near-field electric currents. Partly because it
is easy to show we are daily immersed in EMF exponentially stronger in our
own homes and workpalce than any transmission lines can impart on us, due to
the distances involved. Even attorneys for lineworkers have attempted to
show causal relationship, and to no avail. But I guess they never had an
ambulance chaser like former Senator Edwards who is an expert at
manipulating Juries with junk science. The latest study referenced in this
thread is baseless, like the scores done before it.

Jack