LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 21st 05, 12:00 AM
m II
 
Posts: n/a
Default Regenerative receivers overlooked?

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Message-ID: JAild.83554$E93.76920@clgrps12
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:20:09 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.59.63.227
X-Trace: clgrps12 1100330409 142.59.63.227 (Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:20:09 MST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:20:09 MST
Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.radio.shortwave:404858


Is the Superheterodyne set over rated? It seems to me there were
certain advantages to the OLD ways. Ease of control perhaps not being
one of them.

What was the WORST feature of the Regenerative sets? The BEST feature?

Would it be worthwhile to build a kit?






mike
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers Mike Terry Shortwave 20 July 22nd 04 04:19 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 02:42 AM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 6 October 20th 03 09:52 PM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017