Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 15th 04, 02:27 AM
John S.
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think it would be fun to build one. It would also be fun to learn
to use one. But like tuning a superhet with bandspread dials and
preselector a regen gets old quickly because tuning around is so slow
and fiddly. They are great basis for comparison because they show how
far radio receivers have come.

m II wrote in message news:JAild.83554$E93.76920@clgrps12...
Is the Superheterodyne set over rated? It seems to me there were
certain advantages to the OLD ways. Ease of control perhaps not being
one of them.

What was the WORST feature of the Regenerative sets? The BEST feature?

Would it be worthwhile to build a kit?






mike

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers Mike Terry Shortwave 20 July 22nd 04 05:19 AM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 03:42 AM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 6 October 20th 03 10:52 PM
Means of building low quality receivers Joel Kolstad Homebrew 0 October 18th 03 11:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017