Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 15 Message-ID: JAild.83554$E93.76920@clgrps12 Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 07:20:09 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 142.59.63.227 X-Trace: clgrps12 1100330409 142.59.63.227 (Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:20:09 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:20:09 MST Xref: number1.nntp.dca.giganews.com rec.radio.shortwave:404858 Is the Superheterodyne set over rated? It seems to me there were certain advantages to the OLD ways. Ease of control perhaps not being one of them. What was the WORST feature of the Regenerative sets? The BEST feature? Would it be worthwhile to build a kit? mike |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew |