Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() m II ) writes: Is the Superheterodyne set over rated? It seems to me there were certain advantages to the OLD ways. Ease of control perhaps not being one of them. What was the WORST feature of the Regenerative sets? The BEST feature? Would it be worthwhile to build a kit? You have to remember that Howard Armstrong, who "invented" the regen (he was issued the patent, but it's something you really just trip over rather than invent). then went on to invent the superheterodyne, which does seem to have come from deliberate effort. He was disatisfied with the regen, which led him to experiment and explore until he came up with the superhet. The regen is simple, and that's a big advantage. It provided good gain for a single stage, and it provides better selectivity than a single tuned circuit without regeneration. Beyond that, it's limited. It won't provide great selectivity, it is finicky, and can receiver limited types of modulation. No, it can't be a serious contender for the superhet. On the other hand, there is certainly an appeal to building something, and a regen does make it easier. One can even argue that if someone is going to build a simple receiver, a regen makes more sense; not only simpler, but suffering from none of the superhet's disadvantages when done simply. Some of the disadvantages, apart from the lack of good selectivbity, can be overcome at the cost of more complexity. Add an an amplifier stage before the detector, to isolate it from the effects of the antenna (which can cause the regen to go in and out of regen when you don't want it), add some voltage regulation, add an audio filter. Make sure theregen control is smooth. Charles Kitchin has done a fair amount of work on regens in recent years. Some of the circuits are floating around the web, and he's had quite a few articles in QST. I'm too lazy to dig up the biography once again. There have been a few other "improve the regen" articles in QST in the past decade, though I can't remember dates or author. The first used an optoisolator to add some isolation, and there was another using a bridge for isolation. Michael |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Comparing Four Great Communications Receivers | Shortwave | |||
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history | Policy | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew | |||
Means of building low quality receivers | Homebrew |