Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'll tell everybody what I honestly see happening to shortwave. There will be 4-5 Big Boys, major stations that broadcast in every major language and can be heard almost anywhere, like Radio China and Radio Netherlands. Then there will be a zillion Little Guys, small regional stations that broadcast only to a relatively local audience and almost none of which will be in English-but in local languages and dialects. This will mean the death of QSLing, since Big Boys will have paid monitors and Little Guys won't have the money or language skills to answer their reception reports. But if you're not a QSL hog, it will mean wonderful opportunities for DX, since a lot of the blowtorch stations that characterized the Cold War will be gone or on the air under different names and reduced power (think Radio Kiev, which is now Ukraine Radio International and is hard to hear, or Radio Tirana, which used to be infamous for its bizarre rants but is now almost inaudible) opening up opportunities to hear signals that during the Cold War were blanked by the blowtorches. I've never sent for a QSL in my life, so I'm not concerned about reception reports, but I'll be listening for the small Sam Neua station in Laos that Passport talked about in the 2005 edition as long as their transmitter doesn't burn the station down. Most of the world's population can't afford internet access or satellite radio and will not be able to in the foreseeable future. A lot of those people live outside the range of existing AM and FM stations. So shortwave radio will be around for a while, just not in the form that it was during the Cold War. Interesting. I agree with much of this, but I think there will be more major broadcasters. I wasn't at all surprised when the Swiss pulled out because of the nature of their programming. My sense was that their programs were designed to prop up their tourism industry and, if so, that's something they can do more efficiently via the internet. However, if a country, group or institution has a real message to get out, I don't think the internet, all by itself, is enough. In other words, I don't think they'll be content to put up a website and wait for people to stumble across it. They'll want to take a more proactive approach to securing an international audience. Satellite radio is a possibility, but so is shortwave, depending on the nature of the audience they hope to reach. But maybe I'm missing something. I'm not used to being the 'optimist' in connection with any issue, but I appear to be just that where the future of shortwave is concerned. Steve |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Morse Code Requirement - Is It Really The Reason People Turn Away? | Policy | |||
The Morse Code Requirement - Is It Really The Reason People TurnAway? | Policy |