Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 14th 04, 06:53 PM
Mike Terry
 
Posts: n/a
Default FCC Announces Freqs Protected from BPL Interference

(This was written by Bonnie KQ6XA and is published after checking with the
UK source on the Short Wave Magazine Group).

A rather depressing email from HFPACK. 73 Trevor M5AKA

HFPACK NEWS
http://www.hfpack.com

FCC Allocates New Power Line Transmitting Bands on HF and VHF
================================================== ===========

The new FCC Rules (just issued) list the bands of frequencies BPL
systems are not authorized to transmit on, due to potential
interference to Aeronautical radio systems. From this "inverted"
listing, I have put together a list of the new FCC authorized BPL
transmitting bands of operation:

FCC AUTHORIZED BPL (Broadband over Power Lines)
TRANSMITTING BANDS for USA:
1.705 MHz to 2.850 MHz (160m Amateur Radio Service)
3.025 MHz to 3.400 kHz
3.500 MHz to 4.650 MHz (80m Amateur Radio Service)
4.700 MHz to 5.450 MHz (60m Amateur Radio Service)
5.680 MHz to 6.525 MHz
6.685 MHz to 8.815 MHz (40m Amateur Radio Service)
8.965 MHz to 10.005 MHz
10.100 MHz to 11.275 MHz (30m Amateur Radio Service)
11.400 MHz to 13.260 MHz
13.360 MHz to 17.900 MHz (20m Amateur Radio Service)
17.970 MHz to 21.924 MHz (17m,15m Amateur Radio Service)
22.000 MHz to 74.800 MHz (12m,10m,6m Amateur Radio Service)
75.200 to 80.000 MHz

The entire ruling takes a long time to read and understand... but I
found it quite interesting.

In FCC's report and order, it is obvious that the Amateur Radio
Service has been relegated to insignificant status by the FCC
Commissioners. It is well known that the "White House" made the actual
decision that BPL would be implemented, regardless of the technical
merit. FCC followed by recognizing, yet ignoring and overruling the
technical studies and documented radio interference caused by BPL.

73---Bonnie KQ6XA
PS. Here is a link to the FCC order and an excerpt from new rules.

http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-04-245A1.doc

REPORT AND ORDER
Adopted: October 14, 2004
Released: October 28, 2004
By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioner Abernathy issuing a
joint statement; Commissioners Martin and Adelstein issuing separate
statements; Commissioner Copps approving in part, dissenting in part
and issuing a statement.

"By this action, the Commission amends Part 15 of the rules for radio
frequency (RF) devices regarding Access Broadband over Power Line
(Access BPL), a new type of carrier current system that operates on an
unlicensed basis under Part 15. Access BPL systems use existing
electrical power lines as a transmission medium to provide high-speed
communications capabilities by coupling RF energy onto the power
line..."

"APPENDIX B
FINAL RULE
Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 15, is amended as
follows:
(...)
Section 15.615 General administrative requirements
(f)(1) Excluded Bands. To protect Aeronautical (land) stations and
aircraft receivers, Access BPL operations using overhead medium
voltage power lines are prohibited in the frequency bands listed in
Table 1. Specifically, such BPL systems shall not place carrier
frequencies in these bands.

Table 1. Excluded Frequency Bands
FREQUENCY BAND
2,850 - 3,025 kHz
3,400 - 3,500 kHz
4,650 - 4,700 kHz
5,450 - 5,680 kHz
6,525 - 6,685 kHz
8,815 - 8,965 kHz
10,005 - 10,100 kHz
11,275 - 11,400 kHz
13,260 - 13,360 kHz
17,900 - 17,970 kHz
21,924 - 22,000 kHz
74.8 - 75.2 MHz"


=====
------------- Chelmsford Amateur Radio Society -------------
Support Essex Air Ambulance - Apply for the Chelmsford Award
See CARS website http://www.g0mwt.org.uk/
------------------------------------------------------------

(Short Wave Magazine Group )







  #2   Report Post  
Old November 14th 04, 07:38 PM
Jack Painter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

She's a careless poster, and why would you check a flippin' UK source,
unless you are one too!

Cannot make the assumptions she did, and missed critical avoidance freqs
that you might have caught, had you read the Federal Register for yourself.

Jack

"Mike Terry" wrote
in a waste of everyone's time:
(This was written by Bonnie KQ6XA and is published after checking with the
UK source on the Short Wave Magazine Group).



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 05:41 PM
NTIA Claims BPL Could Help Alleviate Power Line Noise Mike Terry Shortwave 2 June 10th 04 01:12 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 Radionews Policy 0 April 30th 04 05:48 PM
IBOC interference complaint - advice? WBRW Broadcasting 11 February 11th 04 01:08 AM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1371 - November 21, 2003 Radionews Broadcasting 0 November 23rd 03 03:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017