Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.

David wrote:

Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.

There's debate over that too. An off shore blast using an old
battleship would have served as an example. The American military
wanted to see just exactly what the bomb would do to real humans, so
the decision to use hundreds of thousands lives as guinea pigs was
made. War makes scum out many sorts.

The birth defects after the war were atrocious. They set up special
hospital wards for some of them, just to keep the victims out of sight.



mike
mike

"m II" wrote in message
news:IXIod.14754$l65.3690@clgrps13...
David wrote:

Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.

There's debate over that too. An off shore blast using an old
battleship would have served as an example. The American military
wanted to see just exactly what the bomb would do to real humans, so
the decision to use hundreds of thousands lives as guinea pigs was
made. War makes scum out many sorts.

The birth defects after the war were atrocious. They set up special
hospital wards for some of them, just to keep the victims out of sight.



mike
mike

F--k! debates mike. There was a world war going on. It had to end sometime.
We didn't start it. But we sure as hell ended it. And that's what we're
hated for? We're not perfect by no means and yes we've made mistakes but
we're not a bad nation and I resent your constant spitting. Your tone sounds
almost like your referring to the Nazis.

B.H.

Brian Hill wrote:

F--k! debates mike. There was a world war going on. It had to end sometime.
We didn't start it. But we sure as hell ended it. And that's what we're
hated for? We're not perfect by no means and yes we've made mistakes but
we're not a bad nation and I resent your constant spitting. Your tone sounds
almost like your referring to the Nazis.

Well, some members of the US administration have acted in that manner
over the years. I think they are few and far between, but they are
there. Once they get the president's ear, almost anything can happen.

Lots of people in Europe still resent the gift of Eastern and Middle
Europe to the Stalin as a present of appreciation. There were rumours
around that Roosevelt committed suicide when the criminality of what
he had dome hit home.

I also recall reading something in a work by Churchill, where, the
night before Pearl Harbour, he prayed the Japanese attack would go
well in order to get the US into the war. It seems everybody knew what
was going to happen but did nothing to save all those sailor's lives.
They were expendable and needed to be dead in order to get public
anger built up against the Japs. It's an age old trick. Worked in 9/11
too.

Another note..The owner of the World Trade Center told the firemen
there that they were going to bring down building seven. You know the
one. It went down in a controlled demolition right after the firemen
were called back out. His phrase was "We're gonna pull the building"

He collected on the insurance anyway.


Please read some these sites before getting bent out of shape. Look
for articles dealing with the Fire Chief at the site.

See how perfectly the thing goes down. A building that's a city block
long won't do that if there's a problem at one end. OR the middle. Ask
a demolition expert.

http://www.911review.org/Wget/www.ne.../WTC-seven.htm

http://snipurl.com/ausx



http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=...G=Search&meta=

http://snipurl.com/ausn



http://www.altavista.com/web/results...on&kgs=1&kls=0

http://snipurl.com/ausm

m II wrote:

http://killtown.911review.org/wtc7.html

more stuff..





mike

Fascism is lying dormant inches below the surface, always ready to
sprout. We are already 75% there.


On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:15:52 GMT, m II
wrote:


Well, some members of the US administration have acted in that manner
over the years. I think they are few and far between, but they are
there. Once they get the president's ear, almost anything can happen.

"David" wrote in message
...
Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.

Nagasaki was because the Japanese didn't respond to
our demand for unconditional surrender.

--Mike L.

"David" wrote in message
...
Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.




Hey man! I disagree with those bombs but it was not for fun. I can't beleive
the stuff you people say sometimes. Is it just your total hate of America?
WTF!


--
73 and good DXing.
Brian
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A lot of radios and 100' of rusty wire!
Zumbrota, Southern MN
Brian's Radio Universe
http://webpages.charter.net/brianhill/

EMAIL-
(Hide the $100 to reply!)

Brian Hill wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...
Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.




Hey man! I disagree with those bombs but it was not for fun. I can't beleive
the stuff you people say sometimes. Is it just your total hate of America?
WTF!

One must really sit and wonder what goes on in the minds of some folks.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

dxAce wrote:



Brian Hill wrote:

"David" wrote in message
...
Hiroshima would have been sufficient. Nagasaki was just for fun.




Hey man! I disagree with those bombs but it was not for fun. I can't beleive
the stuff you people say sometimes. Is it just your total hate of America?
WTF!

One must really sit and wonder what goes on in the minds of some folks.

What a waste it must be to lose one's mind, or not to have a mind. How
true that is. -Dan Quayle


dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---