I'm not complaining, or have any problems with your article. I also
didn't read it before writing the post, although I think I have read it
some time in the past.
The reason I bring it up, is some seem to get the idea that the
antennas themselves are
"quieter". As far as local noise, and decoupling, I don't consider
adding
decoupling to an antenna, as making it "low noise", even though that
may be an
end result. I just consider that as allowing the antenna to work
properly, without the feedline becoming part
of the antenna. All my antennas are decoupled, and I consider *none* of
them
as being "low noise" antennas. I have no interest in writing articles
per say. I "write"
up my approaches to this, right here on usenet. As far as "incomplete"
antennas, I don't
spend much time thinking about them, as I don't use them. I mean, if
you look at the title,
"Noise reducing antennas", it's very misleading to some. Or could be.
There is no such thing.