I know enough about hitler's Germany.I might have fell off the wagon
long ago,so to speak,but I didn't land on my head! By the way,
www.cryptome.org is a website I like and I have been checking out
everyday for over five years when I first got internet access with my
webtv box.(hey,it serves me A OK) Article at cryptome.org about,FCC
Rules On Radio Frequency Devices.In case y'all want to check it out.
webtv does not suck either.There are lots of folks who are on the msntv
(formerly webtv) one plan thingy and they use their computes on the
msntv one plan and webtv is free.OK,now cuss me out for useing
webtv,frankly,I don't care.I have a Velocity Micro $1,290.00 ProMagix
computer that I bought earlier this year but I only will use it for
World War Two gaming soon as I get satellite internet access.Going to
hang on to my webtv access too.
cuhulin

I have DirecTV.My favorite channel on there (In fact,I am listening to
it right now) is channel 833 Easy Listening.My kind of music,my tv set
is sometimes a radio)
cuhulin

Didn't Canada outlaw the Bible? I wish them crazy canuks would come to
my house and just try!!! to outlaw my Bible!!! They would be in for a
mighty big supprise!!!
cuhulin

Know what's on the canuk dimes? I heard tell their queen is on one side
and a beaver is on the other side of their canuk dimes.
cuhulin

Michael Lawson wrote:

What, you've never heard of military tribunals for
military personnel?

I'm a pessimist. Remember Calley taking the fall? There seem to be
'justice' only when someone is trying to save face in front of the
media. A soldier also knows what the deal is when signing up.
Prisoners are treated differently and rightfully so.


My question stands, because the two are different
types. A member of the US military convicted of a
capital crime can be sentenced to death. Quite different
than executing prisoners of war or mass murder.

We were talking about killing captured enemy combatants...or in the US
case, captured enemy non combatants. Killing a captured unarmed enemy
soldier is plain wrong. You know it.


Does that make Nuremberg a "Death Camp"?? Hardly.
But the inference is there, because people were executed
there, that I because I think that the trials at Nuremberg
were justified as were the outcome, that I must be one
sick puppy.

Nuremberg wasn't done unilaterally by the US. It was decided there
that the chain of command, up to the top was guilty. Why does this
same decision then NOT apply to the US military? Why was Bush trying
to get immunity from the UN even BEFORE the atrocities started? If we
now apply what was decided at Nuremberg, half the US military would be
either hung or in prison, along with Perle, Wolfowitz, Cheney,
Bush..etc..

Using Nuremberg in context to the middle East, is counterproductive.
Russian camps in Siberia were evil. Why are the US camps in Cuba and
everywhere else not?


Or that because I feel that a guy by the
name of Dahmer should have been executed, I am a sick
puppy.

I should not have used that phrase. The death penalty is nothing more
than revenge killing. If the Arabs are looked upon so badly for doing
revenge killings, why do it here? If you want legalize revenge
killings, fine, let the families deal with the perpetrators as their
consciences allow. The state has no business in the death trade.

The death sentence isn't even a deterrent. Look at Texas. If the death
penalty worked as a deterrent, that would be the state with the best
behaved and courteous people in your country. It isn't.

If someone does get a life sentence, then it should mean that. They
work on a State run farm (NOT Halliburton) growing food and making
clothes. They get paid minimum wage, which is immediately sent to any
family they have left behind. That cuts down on the welfare rolls.

A REAL life sentence is a bigger deterrent to crime than some death
penalty that may or may not be carried out..in five or ten or twenty
years. Not forgetting all those tried on faulty evidence or just
framed to get convictions.


mike

Dang right.Like Goober on the Andy Griffith tv show once said,I might be
a hillbilly but I ain't no dummy.
~Alice~

wrote:

Didn't Canada outlaw the Bible? I wish them crazy canuks would come to
my house and just try!!! to outlaw my Bible!!! They would be in for a
mighty big supprise!!!

That's true. We now have to use the Torah and are all subject to
Rabbinical Law. All Politicians must also follow the Talmud. The
Government will be paying for all the mandatory circumcisions.


We got used to it. You will too. It's coming to the US next year.

http://www.altavista.com/image/resul...ah&kgs=1&kls=0


OR:

http://snipurl.com/axvx



mikeisaac II

So,let us study the name Bubba. (and Sissy) Teaching a baby to say
Brother or Sister,what does a baby usually say.Bubba,,, Sissy.Sure,those
are such enduring names coming from the mouths of babys.Call me Bubba
any old time!
cuhulin

I say let us fold our part of our U.S.Military unbrella that covers
canukland and watch them canuks run like Chicken Little.
cuhulin

Because on certain Holidays I take a nip or two from my bottle of Old
Crow Whiskey.Otherwise,I drink my Beer like it's going out of style.Have
a Beer. --- []
cuhulin