Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)
Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and maybe even other broadcasts. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joel Rubin" wrote Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you) Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and maybe even other broadcasts. Any western program material allowed in China is very carefully scrutinized for content. It is heavily monitored and censored. Providers risk losing access if they don't comply the CPC rules. This also extends into the book publishing business as at least one well known TV program provider is also in the book publishing business. The Communist Party in China has so much clout with these morally corrupt publishers that the CPC can snap their fingers and the publisher will refuse to publish a book IN THE U.S. of A if it happens to offend the CPC. These are FACTS! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you)
These are FACTS! Why does CCP still fret over the news? http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/...20050110a2.htm Afraid of the 'JiuPing' (Nine Commentaries) phenomenon, the Chinese Communist Party attempted to control the media and interfere with the freedom of press in the United States. http://english.epochtimes.com/news/5-1-9/25609.html China Seizure Halts U.S. Delivery of President's Book "The Clinton Years" http://www.tibet.ca/en/wtnarchive/2000/8/28_6.html Media tycoon Rupert Murdoch and the Beijing Connection http://www.sprint.net.au/~rwb/murdoch1.htm So, why DOES Radio Canada retransmit Radio Communist? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Joel Rubin wrote: Quid pro quo? (you transmit us - we'll transmit you) Now what would be interesting to know is do these relay deals make any difference in the editorial content of the relayed broadcasts and maybe even other broadcasts. Last week I was listening to the early morning BBC transmissions from East Asia but reception sucked so I tried the local FM band to see if one of the local educational stations was carrying it. The news bulletin ended when I had headphones for both on my head. (The easy way to search a band for another transmission of a current program is to put a diferent radio in each ear and do a quick sweep of the band. When each ear gets the same thing, you get a strange echo effect. If you work in an open (cubicle zoo) office you can tell when somebody in the same room calls you on the phone, even though you couldn't hear the person over the rest of the noise). The next program on shortwave was one of their current events blocks running one of a multi-part series on the problems of privitization of public utilites around the world. But the FM band program was some sort of inspirational filler about somebody or other. I guess that PRI didn't want to offend any free market fundamentalists. Mark Zenier Washington State resident |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) | Shortwave | |||
shortwv | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1415  September 24, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 20 | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Shortwave |