DX-394 & QF-1A Package



Radio Shack DX-394 Receiver

Copy of manual downloaded from support.radioshack.com, normal wear & tear,
few scratches.

All controls operate, no modifications, no antenna



Autek Research QF-1A SSB/CW/AM Filter

Excellent condition.

Copy of instructions & schematic (4 pages)



Photos at:



http://home.nc.rr.com/gpbrown/radios/Page1.html



$190 for the package, delivered in the 48 states

Bank draft or postal MO, only



Gary





Licensed since 1961



See my feedback on eBay ID=K4GPB

Price is about $160.00 to high.

"Gary Brown" wrote in message
. com...
DX-394 & QF-1A Package



Radio Shack DX-394 Receiver

Copy of manual downloaded from support.radioshack.com, normal wear & tear,
few scratches.

All controls operate, no modifications, no antenna



Autek Research QF-1A SSB/CW/AM Filter

Excellent condition.

Copy of instructions & schematic (4 pages)



Photos at:



http://home.nc.rr.com/gpbrown/radios/Page1.html



$190 for the package, delivered in the 48 states

Bank draft or postal MO, only



Gary





Licensed since 1961



See my feedback on eBay ID=K4GPB

Conan Ford wrote:
My condolences on owning a DX-394.

http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm

It's incomprehensible that you take this one rating as the absolute
when:

a) it is not supported by any explanation as to why the reviewer gave
it 1 "H" out of 5.

b) it's supposed to be a "value" rating, i.e., what do you get for the
money or some kind of ratio between features and performance vs cost.
Universal's only reported sale of a used DX-394 was for about $140.

c) Radio Netherlands also gives value ratings with a full review and
explanation - it gave the DX-394 4 out of 5 when the retail price was
$250.

d) ARRL Lab also gave it a good value for money review in QST when it
was selling for $400.

Makes me suspect the dxing.com reviewer meant 4 out of 5 on their
"value" scale since he or she does not say anything bad about it and
the used price is so low.

73, Tom

I'm not sure I understand what the review of a receiver made in 1980
has to do with one made 20 years later. Maybe you would care to
explain how the performance of the 302 would give any information about
the performance of a 394. Having owned one, I can tell you that it was
a decent radio for the price. And it certainly seems to have a
following.


Conan Ford wrote:
My condolences on owning a DX-394.

http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm

wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what the review of a receiver made in 1980
has to do with one made 20 years later. Maybe you would care to
explain how the performance of the 302 would give any information about
the performance of a 394. Having owned one, I can tell you that it was
a decent radio for the price. And it certainly seems to have a
following.


Conan Ford wrote:

My condolences on owning a DX-394.

http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm



The page with the information on the DX-302 is the same page that covers
the DX-394.

"Conan Ford" wrote in message
3.159...
My condolences on owning a DX-394.

http://www.dxing.com/rx/dx302.htm

My condolences on being computer illiterate.