Article at, www.homelandsecurityus.com
Digital Underground.It is a Must Read!
cuhulin

"FDR" wrote in message
...

"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message

I'm not mad. I like you. Your a nice little Nazi. Hey I got one for
ya!

How does Hitler tie his shoes?


I don't know. Tell me.

In little knotzies. LOL Ha!!! Ha!!! ))))))))))))))))))))))

Where do General's keep their Armies?




B.H.





??

B.H.

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Wed 16 Feb 2005 09:00:04p, "FDR"
wrote in message
:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. ..

On Wed 16 Feb 2005 07:50:06p, "FDR"

wrote in message :

There wou;dn't have been a Columbine.


Well, let's see... What could have also been used to the same effect in
a situation like Columbine?
most any combination of:
shotgun

BS.


Au-Contraire! Entirely plausible! Why not?
(Other than you can't think of any other way to refute it?)

bolt-action rifle

BS


Au-Contraire! Entirely plausible! Why not?
(Other than you can't think of any other way to refute it?)

semi-auto .22

BS


Au-Contraire! Entirely plausible! Why not?
(Other than you can't think of any other way to refute it?)

black-powder revolver

BS


Au-Contraire! Entirely plausible! Why not?
(Other than you can't think of any other way to refute it?)

cross-bow
sword
etc., etc., etc.

BS, BS and more BS


Au-Contraire! Entirely plausible! Why not?
(Other than you can't think of any other way to refute it?)


How often do you see police use a sword or crossbow?



Hmmmm... You asserted that if assault rifles weren't avilable, a
"Columbine" would not have happened. I'm asserting that assault rifles are
not at all necessary to carry out a tragedy similar to a "Columbine". To
refute that, you are now somehow equating *police* to the mental
deficients that committed the Columbine tragedy? Sheesh... The first thing
you do when you find yourself in a hole is to quit digging. I think you
and your assertions just started digging faster and have called for the
assistance of some heavy equipment!!




Defective humans who are not thinking rationally can accomplish a great
many evil things without the benefit of a scary "Assault Rifle".

And yet they are highly prized.


Which is "highly prized"? The defective person or the scary assault rifle?
(Not that it makes one whit of difference either way...) Still, perhaps
it's
a sign that you have come to your senses and realize that deficient humans
who are not thinking rationally can accomplish a great many evil things
without the benefit of a scary "Assault Rifle".


Who needs high capacity magazines when there's two of you. One to keep
their heads down while the other reloads... The difference between
our view-points is that I correctly identify the root-cause of the
problem as defective people who wouldn't be bothered by the inability
to obtain one particular type of weapon when there are so many to
choose from. It would appear that you identify the root-cause as an
inanimate object.

At least we agree on that!

-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)

Let him go jd. He's in fantasy land .

B.H.

"-=jd=-" wrote in message

It keeps us off the streets, out of pool halls and prevents associating
with
unsavory characters. Well, two out of three ain't bad...

-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)

Want a buy a lid jd? lol

B.H.

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Wed 16 Feb 2005 07:51:07p, "FDR"

wrote in message :


"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message

I'm not mad. I like you. Your a nice little Nazi. Hey I got one for
ya!

How does Hitler tie his shoes?


I don't know. Tell me.

In little knotzies. LOL Ha!!! Ha!!! ))))))))))))))))))))))

Where do General's keep their Armies?




In their sleeve-ies?

Ding. You get a prize!


-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)

FDR wrote:

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Wed 16 Feb 2005 07:51:07p, "FDR"

wrote in message :


"Brian Hill" wrote in message
...

"FDR" wrote in message

I'm not mad. I like you. Your a nice little Nazi. Hey I got one for
ya!

How does Hitler tie his shoes?


I don't know. Tell me.

In little knotzies. LOL Ha!!! Ha!!! ))))))))))))))))))))))

Where do General's keep their Armies?




In their sleeve-ies?

Ding. You get a prize!

Ding. So do you! You've beat out David as 'Tard of The Day.

Now go take your meds, 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

B.H. wrote:

I understand but I'm not willing to budge on any aspect of my
freedom as
it's laid out in the Bill of Right or in our Constitution. I don't
believe
in security over freedom because it doesn't work and it ultimately
opens the
door to further erosion of our rights.

Fair enough, and I agree. You must have some real concerns with the
Patriot Act and our current leadership, then, because I sure do,
vis-a-vis the Bill of Rights. The potential exists to make life quite
a bit more obnoxious under that Act.

Bruce Jensen

"FDR" wrote in message
...

"-=jd=-" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed 16 Feb 2005 07:50:06p, "FDR"

wrote in message :


"clifto" wrote in message
...
FDR wrote:
Well tell me how the gun gets from the manufacturer to the
terrorist?

Well, tell me a few of those ways

stores,

So if stores didn't sell assault weapons that would eliminate that
source.

I see, you're one of those wild-eyed fantasy boys who believes that if
all
guns disappeared, there'd be no killing.

There wou;dn't have been a Columbine.


Well, let's see... What could have also been used to the same effect in
a
situation like Columbine?
most any combination of:
shotgun

BS.

bolt-action rifle

BS

semi-auto .22

BS

black-powder revolver

BS

cross-bow
sword
etc., etc., etc.

BS, BS and more BS

How often do you see police use a sword or crossbow?


Defective humans who are not thinking rationally can accomplish a great
many evil things without the benefit of a scary "Assault Rifle".

And yet they are highly prized.
You really have no idea what you're talking about. The so-called "assault
rifle" is just a plain old semi-auto that looks scary to liberals. They work
EXACTLY the same. A true assault rifle, fully automatic, has been extremely
regulated since 1934. I have a .22 rifle that is semi-auto and tube fed, it
holds 18 rounds. Is this also an "assault rifle" The rifles you speak of as
being "highly prized" are also highly expensive and have been found to be
used in less that 1% of all firearms crimes. There basically a non-issue,
well, to rational thinking people that is.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
ups.com...
B.H. wrote:

I understand but I'm not willing to budge on any aspect of my
freedom as
it's laid out in the Bill of Right or in our Constitution. I don't
believe
in security over freedom because it doesn't work and it ultimately
opens the
door to further erosion of our rights.

Fair enough, and I agree. You must have some real concerns with the
Patriot Act and our current leadership, then, because I sure do,
vis-a-vis the Bill of Rights. The potential exists to make life
quite
a bit more obnoxious under that Act.

Yeah, but it's conservative opression, so it's ok. Right?

Damn right! It sure beats left-wing 'tard boy oppression any old day.

Ok. Now I understand. You don't like the Constitution.

LMAO... the 'tard just made another stupid statement.

You don't understand jack, 'tard boy.

Yeah, but I do understand that you don't like the Constitution. Are you a
communist?


dxAce
Michigan
USA

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"bpnjensen" wrote in message
ups.com...
B.H. wrote:

I understand but I'm not willing to budge on any aspect of my
freedom as
it's laid out in the Bill of Right or in our Constitution. I don't
believe
in security over freedom because it doesn't work and it ultimately
opens the
door to further erosion of our rights.

Fair enough, and I agree. You must have some real concerns with the
Patriot Act and our current leadership, then, because I sure do,
vis-a-vis the Bill of Rights. The potential exists to make life
quite
a bit more obnoxious under that Act.

Yeah, but it's conservative opression, so it's ok. Right?

Damn right! It sure beats left-wing 'tard boy oppression any old day.

Ok. Now I understand. You don't like the Constitution.

LMAO... the 'tard just made another stupid statement.

You don't understand jack, 'tard boy.

Yeah, but I do understand that you don't like the Constitution. Are you a
communist?

You're just a hopeless 'tard boy.

Now go play with your ant farm.

dxAce
Michigan
USA