Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21/02/2005 5:05 AM, Conan Ford wrote:
"Brian Hill" wrote in : http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...73&item=575352 2185&rd=1 "I provide shipping costs to the winning bidder only." Oh yeah that's good. Buyer: How much for shipping? Seller: $200 Buyer: !)@#$*(!! Seller: Want negative feedback? Buyer: No.... (whimper) Seller: pay up. It's $250 now. You can complain to eBay if you get scammed like this. The seller agrees to charge "reasonable" shipping costs, and you are not expected to pay obviously inflated shipping costs even if you win the auction. Anyway, negative feedback works both ways. The problem (for me) is that I often don't know where the buyer lives until the bidding is done. Since I send stuff by post, the cost can vary greatly depending on the destination. I feel it's fairer to not charge a flat rate to the farthest destination when I might be selling to someone just up the street. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTB: technical manual for G-186 spectrum display (part of G-133 Temco system) | Boatanchors | |||
America Need Unchained Spectrum | CB | |||
No More Technology Jail USA With Bandwidth-Based Spectrum Management | Policy | |||
How Things Work ; FCC Spectrum Laws | Shortwave | |||
How Things Work ; FCC Spectrum Laws | Broadcasting |