| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
The passing of Dr. Scott & r.r.s. merrymaking
By now all of you know that Dr. Gene Scott has passed, but guess what?
All of US are going to pass away also. It is appointed unto man once to die AND AFTER THAT THE JUDGMENT! Heb. 9:27 The righteous are REQUIRED to tell the wicked they are going to die. Eze. 3:18 The Christian is better off dead because he is with Christ and no longer concerned about possibly failing and denying Christ here on earth. Phillipians 1:23. The non-Christian needs to be greatly concerned about dying before accepting Christ for there is NO OTHER WAY to the Father in heaven. John 14:6, KJV, "Jesus saith unto him, I am THE way, THE truth, and THE life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. |
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. "But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not." - 2 Peter 2:1-3 NOW tell me AP -- If that passage above don't describe the late Dr. euGene Scott to a tee...then I don't know what does !! |
Harvey WhitezChocoBunny wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. "But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not." - 2 Peter 2:1-3 NOW tell me AP -- If that passage above don't describe the late Dr. euGene Scott to a tee...then I don't know what does !! I know that the scripture quoted is true. I DON'T know Dr. Gene Scott. As many times as I ran across him on the dial I very seldom stopped to listen to him. I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Again, I can't tell you if "that" described Dr. Scott or not. I suspect it describes a number of radio and tv preachers! ....as well as a number of them who are NOT on radio or tv! :-( |
|
Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a
grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. I'm certain that this fascinating bit of information is also supported by irrefutable proof. |
"Brian Running" wrote in message ... Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. I'm certain that this fascinating bit of information is also supported by irrefutable proof. If you look you will find. B |
According to the American Kennel Club,Australian Cattle Dogs live an
average of about 14 years and I am only 63 years young/old.I have to live about at least another 14 years or so. www.cattledog.com cuhulin |
BDK wrote:
In article , says... By now all of you know that Dr. Gene Scott has passed, but guess what? All of US are going to pass away also. It is appointed unto man once to die AND AFTER THAT THE JUDGMENT! Heb. 9:27 The righteous are REQUIRED to tell the wicked they are going to die. Eze. 3:18 The Christian is better off dead because he is with Christ and no longer concerned about possibly failing and denying Christ here on earth. Phillipians 1:23. So you claim..proof. The bible is not proof Al! A book can say anything. This is an interesting verse, for it brings up a mention of the time when Christians would only be baptized on their deathbeds so they wouldn't have time to sin before they died and thus jeapordize (sp?) their entry into heaven. The non-Christian needs to be greatly concerned about dying before accepting Christ for there is NO OTHER WAY to the Father in heaven. John 14:6, KJV, "Jesus saith unto him, I am THE way, THE truth, and THE life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." So you claim, I'm not really worried, I'll just be worm food, like you. You probably aren't going anywhere...except into the ground. Just like Gene Scott. Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. I thought he was amusing. Most all the other preachers are slimeballs at best, so I'm not rejoicing he's dead, but I don't think there's any reason to be happy about it...and prostate cancer can be a bad way to go... My grandfather died of prostate cancer, and he suffered greatly before he died. I don't think that there's much a person can do to justify that sort of suffering being put upon them. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
Brian Oakley wrote:
"Brian Running" wrote in message ... Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. I'm certain that this fascinating bit of information is also supported by irrefutable proof. If you look you will find. B He asked you for PROOF. Are you unfamiliar with the meaning of "proof"? ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
There is Proof that when some folks die,they instantly lose about three
ounces of their body weight.It is Proof of something.How do you explain that? Their Souls going to Heaven,or what? cuhulin |
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. |
Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a
search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll turn up a few of them. ======== Honus wrote: "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. |
running dogg wrote:
He asked you for PROOF. Are you unfamiliar with the meaning of "proof"? You mean like 100 proof? ;-) Sorry, couldn't resist! |
wrote in message ... There is Proof that when some folks die,they instantly lose about three ounces of their body weight.It is Proof of something.How do you explain that? Their Souls going to Heaven,or what? No, there is no "proof" of that. http://www.snopes.com/religion/soulweight.asp |
"running dogg" wrote in message ... Brian Oakley wrote: "Brian Running" wrote in message ... Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. I'm certain that this fascinating bit of information is also supported by irrefutable proof. If you look you will find. B He asked you for PROOF. Are you unfamiliar with the meaning of "proof"? Not my job. If he wants it its out there. B |
"Honus" wrote in message news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They are of age. Ask them. B |
running dogg wrote:
My grandfather died of prostate cancer, and he suffered greatly before he died. I don't think that there's much a person can do to justify that sort of suffering being put upon them. Some people would rather die trusting God than to live a bit longer trusting in Doc - or Festus -- or Matt Dillon! ;-) Do you know where the Medical Deists (MD's) got their symbol? I'll give you a hint. Numbers 21 and II Kings 18 and it represented Jesus Christ the healer, who also suffered and died for us. It seems to me the medical industry is very much attempting to play God. In an accident they're mighty good folks to have around. But when it comes to the drugging of America, and the rest of the world, I expect we'd all be better off living right, eating right, and using herbs which are God made than using man made drugs. But then that's like elbows -- everyone has two! :-) |
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll turn up a few of them. No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian or g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have one of those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they look on the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you- name someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more specific post to cite? |
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... running dogg wrote: My grandfather died of prostate cancer, and he suffered greatly before he died. I don't think that there's much a person can do to justify that sort of suffering being put upon them. Some people would rather die trusting God than to live a bit longer trusting in Doc - or Festus -- or Matt Dillon! ;-) Do you know where the Medical Deists (MD's) got their symbol? I'll give you a hint. Numbers 21 and II Kings 18 and it represented Jesus Christ the healer, who also suffered and died for us. It seems to me the medical industry is very much attempting to play God. In an accident they're mighty good folks to have around. But when it comes to the drugging of America, and the rest of the world, I expect we'd all be better off living right, eating right, and using herbs which are God made than using man made drugs. But then that's like elbows -- everyone has two! :-) My god. I read that post without first seeing who sent it, and thought cuhulin had finally gotten himself a spell-checker. |
BDK wrote:
The bible is not proof Al! A book can say anything. True, a book can say anything and some of them say practically nothing. But let's consider the Bible for a bit. It was written over a period of about 1600 years by about 40 different authors. It has changed the lives of more people than all the other books in the world - combined! Much more could be said here, but I'll conclude with this. Look for the new message called "A Tribute to the Bible". No, I did not write it. It was copyrighted in 1963. YEP, you King James Only folks, it's the King James Version - - and it's COPYRIGHTED!!!! This was one of Gail Riplinger's arguments against the NEW versions. They were written so men could make money on them. Like SHE wasn't making money on her book(s). ...Like THEY were not copyrighted. Copyrights are to protect the author so they CAN make money on it. Anyway, so much for that also. I did not write this "tribute" but rather found it in a Dake Bible which is KJV and was copyrighted in 1963. I don't know if it originated with him, existed long before him, or if he modified someone else's work. Point is - I will post it, but won't even pretend to "own" it. :-) |
Honus wrote:
My god. I read that post without first seeing who sent it, and thought cuhulin had finally gotten himself a spell-checker. You should see ALL my messages before I spell-check them! Sometimes I misspell Al and I've known him for many decades! ;-) Sometimes I misspell them so badly the spell checker won't even hint at what I thought I meant -- just indicate it's wrong. Then I have to go to Webster's dictionary, a book of synonyms or even a thesaurus and find another word! |
Honus wrote:
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll turn up a few of them. No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian or g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have one of those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they look on the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you- name someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more specific post to cite? You want someone else to do ALL your work for you? Besides that, just because I know something doesn't mean I have to tell YOU! . . . . and just because you DEMAND it! ;-) |
In article ,
says... "BDK" wrote in message ... In article , says... By now all of you know that Dr. Gene Scott has passed, but guess what? All of US are going to pass away also. It is appointed unto man once to die AND AFTER THAT THE JUDGMENT! Heb. 9:27 The righteous are REQUIRED to tell the wicked they are going to die. Eze. 3:18 The Christian is better off dead because he is with Christ and no longer concerned about possibly failing and denying Christ here on earth. Phillipians 1:23. So you claim..proof. The bible is not proof Al! A book can say anything. The non-Christian needs to be greatly concerned about dying before accepting Christ for there is NO OTHER WAY to the Father in heaven. John 14:6, KJV, "Jesus saith unto him, I am THE way, THE truth, and THE life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." So you claim, I'm not really worried, I'll just be worm food, like you. You probably aren't going anywhere...except into the ground. Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. I thought he was amusing. Most all the other preachers are slimeballs at best, so I'm not rejoicing he's dead, but I don't think there's any reason to be happy about it...and prostate cancer can be a bad way to go... Right here I could interject the same word you used above. Proof. How do you know its a bad way to go? You gone that way? No. You know someone who has? Maybe yes. The same could be said for Dr. Scott. If you ever knew any Christians, you would see their serenity in their leaving this world. Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. So throwing that word "proof" around shouldnt make you feel as smug as you think you are. B Smug?? No, just realistic. I knew two people that had prostate cancer, one is still alive, having had to be castrated, and then radiated and chemoed to the point he almost died from it alone. But somehow, he made it. Tough guy. The other guy had no signs of any problems, then started having pain when standing up. He was loaded with cancer that had spread to his spine. The cancer was so widespread they didn't even try to do chemo, he was too far gone. He spent his last 3 weeks or so in bed, hooked to a morphine drip that never put out enough to really stop the pain. He was a christian, and he wasn't "serene" in the least. Maybe he had doubts.. Other christians may be more serene, but the placebo effect can account for that. If you believe in something strong enough, it can do "wonders". But the most "serene" person I ever saw that was dying was a friend's dad, who was an atheist from a young age, like myself. He was ok with it, "Hey, 80 isn't that bad, longer than I ever expected!" He just kind of faded away. Boy, would he have been ****ed if he knew his sisters got together and had a minister do a memorial service before the "real" one. The after funeral "wake" was about as tense as I have ever seen, one of the sister's kids blabbed the whole deal as the real service ended. It was entertaining. BDK |
"Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They are of age. Ask them. I wasn't talking to you, unless you're one of Al Patrick's sock-puppets. |
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll turn up a few of them. No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian or g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have one of those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they look on the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you- name someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more specific post to cite? You want someone else to do ALL your work for you? Besides that, just because I know something doesn't mean I have to tell YOU! . . . . and just because you DEMAND it! ;-) You realize, don't you, that you could have written a name in a fraction of the time and with a fraction of the effort that it took for you to demonstrate your inability to support your claims? But of course, that's redundant. You can't write a name because you can't support your claim. Besides, I didn't ask for you to do my homework; I asked for -you- to support -your- allegation. I asked if you had a name in mind. I asked if you had a specific post that you could cite to bolster your claim. Your failure is duly noted. And certainly not unexpected. |
|
"Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: My god. I read that post without first seeing who sent it, and thought cuhulin had finally gotten himself a spell-checker. You should see ALL my messages before I spell-check them! Ha! You should see the messages that I decide not to send. ;) |
In a message under the heading of " The passing of Dr. Scott & r.r.s.
merrymaking" BDK wrote: But god made them, just like botulism, right? Check this out: Yes, I know it isn't botulism. (There I go changing the subject again!) It's Trichinosis I'm mentioning here. However, there's something very interesting about it. ALL the animals mentioned happen to be animals that God told us NOT TO EAT. (See God's dietary laws in the Bible, also known as clean and unclean meats. I believe the bear is in the UNclean category.) "Trichinosis is a parasitic disease that results from eating undercooked meat, most frequently pork, which contains cysts of Trichinella spiralis. T. spiralis can be found in pork, bear, fox, rat, horse and lion meat." Clipped from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/e...cle/000631.htm |
"Honus" wrote in message news:TSSSd.54280$uc.7168@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They are of age. Ask them. I wasn't talking to you, unless you're one of Al Patrick's sock-puppets. Gosh, guess only one person can reply to an atheists post but atheists can crosspost to every anti-Christian ng on the web and its ok? Guess you got an answer to your question though didn't you? B |
"BDK" wrote in message ... In article , says... running dogg wrote: My grandfather died of prostate cancer, and he suffered greatly before he died. I don't think that there's much a person can do to justify that sort of suffering being put upon them. Some people would rather die trusting God than to live a bit longer trusting in Doc - or Festus -- or Matt Dillon! ;-) Do you know where the Medical Deists (MD's) got their symbol? I'll give you a hint. Numbers 21 and II Kings 18 and it represented Jesus Christ the healer, who also suffered and died for us. It seems to me the medical industry is very much attempting to play God. In an accident they're mighty good folks to have around. But when it comes to the drugging of America, and the rest of the world, I expect we'd all be better off living right, eating right, and using herbs which are God made than using man made drugs. But then that's like elbows -- everyone has two! :-) Wow, I'm shocked Al! A post that isn't off the wall, jew hatin BS! The only thing about the herbal stuff is that some of them are not what the "health" industry tries to say they are. A lot of them are poisonous, or have the same negatives a lot of drugs have, without any regulation. But god made them, just like botulism, right? BDK Yes He did, and we are the ones that decide if its useful as medicine or not. Sometimes man makes some pretty stupid assessments, especially where nature is concerned. B |
"Honus" wrote in message news:CWSSd.54281$uc.22333@trnddc04... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Honus wrote: "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... Go to http://groups-beta.google.com/grphp?hl=en&tab=wg&q= and do a search of this news group. Look for the words xian and g-d and you'll turn up a few of them. No. Name one. I'm not interested in seeing who uses the spelling xian or g-d. I'm not interested in wading through all of the posts that have one of those words in them, either, in search of someone saying that they look on the death of any Christian with glee. I'm interested in hearing -you- name someone in this group who "would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian." Surely you must have had someone in mind? Or a more specific post to cite? You want someone else to do ALL your work for you? Besides that, just because I know something doesn't mean I have to tell YOU! . . . . and just because you DEMAND it! ;-) You realize, don't you, that you could have written a name in a fraction of the time and with a fraction of the effort that it took for you to demonstrate your inability to support your claims? But of course, that's redundant. You can't write a name because you can't support your claim. Besides, I didn't ask for you to do my homework; I asked for -you- to support -your- allegation. I asked if you had a name in mind. I asked if you had a specific post that you could cite to bolster your claim. Your failure is duly noted. And certainly not unexpected. So just because someone doesn't do exactly as you dictate, its failure. I see. Lets all bow down to the person that screams the loudest. That's a good way to win an argument. Just call them a failure for lack of anything YOU could post to the contrary? Now lets put the shoe on the other foot. You asked him for proof. Are you willing to back up your allegation that there are NOT any on the ng that would rejoice at the death of a real Christian? Statistics show that through the centuries, there are more that do rejoice at the death of Christians than there are of those that don't. That is an obvious historical fact, no one even has to look that up. B |
"BDK" wrote in message ... In article , says... "BDK" wrote in message ... In article , says... By now all of you know that Dr. Gene Scott has passed, but guess what? All of US are going to pass away also. It is appointed unto man once to die AND AFTER THAT THE JUDGMENT! Heb. 9:27 The righteous are REQUIRED to tell the wicked they are going to die. Eze. 3:18 The Christian is better off dead because he is with Christ and no longer concerned about possibly failing and denying Christ here on earth. Phillipians 1:23. So you claim..proof. The bible is not proof Al! A book can say anything. The non-Christian needs to be greatly concerned about dying before accepting Christ for there is NO OTHER WAY to the Father in heaven. John 14:6, KJV, "Jesus saith unto him, I am THE way, THE truth, and THE life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." So you claim, I'm not really worried, I'll just be worm food, like you. You probably aren't going anywhere...except into the ground. Some of you rejoice at the death of Dr. Gene Scott. Many Christians rejoice with you for, if he was truly a Christian (only God knows the heart), he is far better off than he ever was here. ... Even before he got prostate cancer. See Phil. 1:23. I thought he was amusing. Most all the other preachers are slimeballs at best, so I'm not rejoicing he's dead, but I don't think there's any reason to be happy about it...and prostate cancer can be a bad way to go... Right here I could interject the same word you used above. Proof. How do you know its a bad way to go? You gone that way? No. You know someone who has? Maybe yes. The same could be said for Dr. Scott. If you ever knew any Christians, you would see their serenity in their leaving this world. Ask the doctors. They can tell you that Christians on the whole have more of a grip on death than those who dont know God. They can tell you the horror on the faces of those who die not knowing what will happen to them after they are gone. So throwing that word "proof" around shouldnt make you feel as smug as you think you are. B Smug?? No, just realistic. I knew two people that had prostate cancer, one is still alive, having had to be castrated, and then radiated and chemoed to the point he almost died from it alone. But somehow, he made it. Tough guy. The other guy had no signs of any problems, then started having pain when standing up. He was loaded with cancer that had spread to his spine. The cancer was so widespread they didn't even try to do chemo, he was too far gone. He spent his last 3 weeks or so in bed, hooked to a morphine drip that never put out enough to really stop the pain. He was a christian, and he wasn't "serene" in the least. Maybe he had doubts.. Other christians may be more serene, but the placebo effect can account for that. If you believe in something strong enough, it can do "wonders". But the most "serene" person I ever saw that was dying was a friend's dad, who was an atheist from a young age, like myself. He was ok with it, "Hey, 80 isn't that bad, longer than I ever expected!" He just kind of faded away. Boy, would he have been ****ed if he knew his sisters got together and had a minister do a memorial service before the "real" one. The after funeral "wake" was about as tense as I have ever seen, one of the sister's kids blabbed the whole deal as the real service ended. It was entertaining. BDK To dismiss changed lives as a result of the teachings of the Bible is smugness. You don't know most peoples testimonies. And it is their testimony. You cant deny it. You don't have to believe it, but that doesn't make you right. After all, they are the ones claiming a changed live. If you don't believe it, fine, go your way, but you don't need to be putting them down. You don't have the authority to speak for them. B |
"Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:TSSSd.54280$uc.7168@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They are of age. Ask them. I wasn't talking to you, unless you're one of Al Patrick's sock-puppets. Gosh, guess only one person can reply to an atheists I was asking something of a specific individual. He made the statement, he can back it up. Since he's the one thinking of particular individuals, then he's the only one who can answer the question despite your pathetic need to interject on his behalf. Unless of course you think you're some sort of mind-reader, which would only be par for the course for so many theists. It stands to reason that they -must- be able to read minds and see into the hearts of other people...otherwise, how could they justify being so judgemental? But of course that doesn't apply to you. Besides, your answer wasn't an answer at all. post but atheists can crosspost to every anti-Christian ng on the web and its ok? Well, duh. If it's an anti-Christian ng, then that's most likely an appropriate place for an atheist to post. Would you rather they posted to PRO-Christian newsgroups? Christ, you guys bitch about -everything-. Guess you got an answer to your question though didn't you? If my question was is Brian Oakley a dick, then I guess I did indeed. |
"Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... To dismiss changed lives as a result of the teachings of the Bible is smugness. Sort of like how Christians dismiss changed lives as the result of the changed person reading -other- holy texts, right? It does happen, you know. Not too many Christians are as generous as you must be when it comes to giving credit where credit is due. Tell me, do you rejoice when you hear of a changed life because of, say, a conversion to Islam? Or do you simply dismiss it? |
"Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message Your failure is duly noted. And certainly not unexpected. So just because someone doesn't do exactly as you dictate, its failure. Boy, you -are- a theist, aren't you? Classic, in fact. Twist and shout. see. Lets all bow down to the person that screams the loudest. That's a good way to win an argument. Just call them a failure for lack of anything YOU could post to the contrary? sigh Patrick made the positive assertion. Therefore, it's up to him to provide support for his assertion. What are you, twelve? This stuff is all so basic. Now lets put the shoe on the other foot. You asked him for proof. Are you willing to back up your allegation that there are NOT any on the ng that would rejoice at the death of a real Christian? I made no such allegation, theist. Show me where I did, or retract the statement. You think you know where I was headed with Al; you're wrong. Hell, boy...there are probably Christians around here that rejoice at the death of a real Christian. By the way...your use of that term frightens me. People that think like that are dangerous. "Real" Christians? You ought to know the dangers of that kind of thinking. Statistics show that through the centuries, there are more that do rejoice at the death of Christians than there are of those that don't. That is an obvious historical fact, no one even has to look that up. That's a good thing, because it -can't- be looked up. Statistics? Please. There are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of Christians, and there always has been. They're are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of atheists, and there always has been. There are always going to be people that rejoice at the death of someone that they see as being on the other side. Your assertion that more people rejoice at the deaths of Christians than don't is hyperbole. It's not an obvious historical fact, and you need to take a long hard look at the history of your faith before you start making remarks like that. And seek some help with persecution complex of yours. |
Honus, Like I said, search the groups for the words (?) xian and g-d
and you'll find several of them. Don't expect ME to do YOUR work for you! ;-) Uh oh, Now I'm guilty of top posting. ========= Honus wrote: "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. |
"Honus" wrote in message news:p3VSd.54648$uc.23474@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message Your failure is duly noted. And certainly not unexpected. So just because someone doesn't do exactly as you dictate, its failure. Boy, you -are- a theist, aren't you? Classic, in fact. Twist and shout. I know you mean that as a derogatory remark, but its far from that. If you knew what theist meant, you would find a different word to use. see. Lets all bow down to the person that screams the loudest. That's a good way to win an argument. Just call them a failure for lack of anything YOU could post to the contrary? sigh Patrick made the positive assertion. Therefore, it's up to him to provide support for his assertion. What are you, twelve? This stuff is all so basic. No not up to him. He can say and do what he wants. He doesnt have to prove anything. This is a free country. If youre that concerned with proof, go find it yourself. You wouldnt ask your employer to prove something to you when he makes a statements. Because hed fire you. You would go look it up yourself, hipocryte. So basic huh? Now lets put the shoe on the other foot. You asked him for proof. Are you willing to back up your allegation that there are NOT any on the ng that would rejoice at the death of a real Christian? I made no such allegation, theist. Show me where I did, or retract the statement. You think you know where I was headed with Al; you're wrong. Hell, boy...there are probably Christians around here that rejoice at the death of a real Christian. By the way...your use of that term frightens me. People that think like that are dangerous. "Real" Christians? You ought to know the dangers of that kind of thinking. Sure you did. You did so in a reverse manner in asking Al to prove that there were folks here that felt that way. Your wanting proof only shows a wanting to silence anyone anytime you want them to be silenced. Thats hogwash. Its obvious you dont know what Im talking about when I say real Christians so I wouldnt pretend if I were you. Statistics show that through the centuries, there are more that do rejoice at the death of Christians than there are of those that don't. That is an obvious historical fact, no one even has to look that up. That's a good thing, because it -can't- be looked up. Statistics? Please. Go read a history book. Go read the Sudanese newspapers. Do it yourself you lazy lout. There are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of Christians, and there always has been. They're are plenty that rejoice at the deaths of atheists, and there always has been. There are always going to be people that rejoice at the death of someone that they see as being on the other side. Your assertion that more people rejoice at the deaths of Christians than don't is hyperbole. It's not an obvious historical fact, and you need to take a long hard look at the history of your faith before you start making remarks like that. Again, go read a history book. Christians are the most persecuted people in the world. And seek some help with persecution complex of yours. Dont have a complex sir. I see adhominim attacks are all you know how to do. Go to debate school. Might learn something about free speech while youre there as well. B |
"Honus" wrote in message news:0PUSd.54644$uc.42624@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... To dismiss changed lives as a result of the teachings of the Bible is smugness. Sort of like how Christians dismiss changed lives as the result of the changed person reading -other- holy texts, right? It does happen, you know. Not too many Christians are as generous as you must be when it comes to giving credit where credit is due. Tell me, do you rejoice when you hear of a changed life because of, say, a conversion to Islam? Or do you simply dismiss it? I don't rejoice, because I know what the Koran teaches. Dismiss it? No. There are other spirits that can influence someone when they open a doorway to let them in. Do you know much about the spirit world? B |
"Honus" wrote in message news:8xUSd.54616$uc.51542@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:TSSSd.54280$uc.7168@trnddc04... "Brian Oakley" wrote in message ... "Honus" wrote in message news:yOQSd.38101$uc.30945@trnddc08... "Al Patrick" wrote in message ... I do know that a few on this group would rejoice at the thoughts of the death of any true Christian. Name one. Dont really need to. They are there. They know who they are. They are of age. Ask them. I wasn't talking to you, unless you're one of Al Patrick's sock-puppets. Gosh, guess only one person can reply to an atheists I was asking something of a specific individual. He made the statement, he can back it up. Since he's the one thinking of particular individuals, then he's the only one who can answer the question despite your pathetic need to interject on his behalf. Unless of course you think you're some sort of mind-reader, which would only be par for the course for so many theists. It stands to reason that they -must- be able to read minds and see into the hearts of other people...otherwise, how could they justify being so judgemental? But of course that doesn't apply to you. When someone else jumps in to help, you atheists get all frazzeled. If you cant take the heat... Besides, your answer wasn't an answer at all. Yeah, just pooh pooh it off. What a lame statement. post but atheists can crosspost to every anti-Christian ng on the web and its ok? Well, duh. If it's an anti-Christian ng, then that's most likely an appropriate place for an atheist to post. Would you rather they posted to PRO-Christian newsgroups? Christ, you guys bitch about -everything-. Yeah for the effect of virtually shouting someone down in that they cant reply to every post from every anti-Christian ng on the web. THATS why you crosspost. Because thats where all the athiest hang out to bolster each one in his folly. There arent enough athiests in the world to fill ALL the ng's with a majority. Er to wit, lets crosspost to those minority athiestic ng's and make our voice so loud that they will shut up. Yeah, good way to "win" a debate and make us look smart. Oh brother. Guess you got an answer to your question though didn't you? If my question was is Brian Oakley a dick, then I guess I did indeed. Again, if ad hominem attacks are the best you can do then I suggest you find a different occupation than a professional ng lurker. B |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:08 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com