Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For a well designed integrated circuit, the most likely thing to fail
is the package, which in turn leads to failure in the bonding. Consumer grade electronics use porous plastic packages, while the military forks out for ceramic. It is possible to get ion contaminator from how the wafers were handled (such as a moron touching the edge), but the associated threshold shifts show up very soon. I'm not sure if you can find this on the net, but all the IC companies do some sort of die seal to reduce this problem. I'd blame the capacitors, especially tantalum. Resistors should be stable. Regarding electromigration, this is also well understood and compensated for in the design process. I can tell you that most chips coming to a failure analysis lab are damaged by electrical overstress. Often a power surge will shoot right through the power supply and zap some chip. [Some radios are "always on" if hooked up to the AC mains, so a radio that is off can get zapped.] Second comes latch-up related problems, not exactly the fault of the chip, i.e. all chips using reverse biased diode isolation will latch under some external conditions. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old Timer is a Newb again! Explain Trunking and Digital PLEASE! | Scanner | |||
Can anyone explain? | Shortwave | |||
Can anyone explain why Technicians should be upgraded to General? | Policy | |||
My attempt to explain EIRP, or why EIRP should not be confused with transmitter power... | Shortwave |