Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Telamon wrote: Radio Australia much stronger on 9580 and 11880 than usual this morning and sounding like a local station with S10 level signals. New Zealand on the other hand weak and noisy but listen-able at 17:00 UTC. Ran across it this morning and it was its usual 10-20 over S9 here. Radio Australia, 9580 at around 1300... As you could guess RA is stronger earlier in the morning trending toward a weaker signal later morning. The lower frequency on 31 meters fades first so I switch my listening to the higher one on 25 meters as late morning approaches. For this time in the morning 9580 was much stronger and 11880 is little better than usual for me. Both were very good. New Zealand was a different story this morning at 17:00 UTC very weak where they were very strong during my dark hours. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Telamon wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Telamon wrote: Radio Australia much stronger on 9580 and 11880 than usual this morning and sounding like a local station with S10 level signals. New Zealand on the other hand weak and noisy but listen-able at 17:00 UTC. Ran across it this morning and it was its usual 10-20 over S9 here. Radio Australia, 9580 at around 1300... As you could guess RA is stronger earlier in the morning trending toward a weaker signal later morning. The lower frequency on 31 meters fades first so I switch my listening to the higher one on 25 meters as late morning approaches. For this time in the morning 9580 was much stronger and 11880 is little better than usual for me. Both were very good. New Zealand was a different story this morning at 17:00 UTC very weak where they were very strong during my dark hours. I apparently have RNZ here at 2125 on 15265 but so weak as to be almost inaudible. How is it on your end today? dxAce Michigan USA |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Telamon wrote: Radio Australia much stronger on 9580 and 11880 than usual this morning and sounding like a local station with S10 level signals. New Zealand on the other hand weak and noisy but listen-able at 17:00 UTC. Ran across it this morning and it was its usual 10-20 over S9 here. Radio Australia, 9580 at around 1300... As you could guess RA is stronger earlier in the morning trending toward a weaker signal later morning. The lower frequency on 31 meters fades first so I switch my listening to the higher one on 25 meters as late morning approaches. For this time in the morning 9580 was much stronger and 11880 is little better than usual for me. Both were very good. New Zealand was a different story this morning at 17:00 UTC very weak where they were very strong during my dark hours. I apparently have RNZ here at 2125 on 15265 but so weak as to be almost inaudible. How is it on your end today? Well around 17:00 UTC I only listened to them a few minutes and they were noisy with the normal static noise you hear on any weak signal but they were "listen-able" from the standpoint that without effort I could understand all that was said over the bookshelf speaker. That is my definition of "listen-able." Currently they sound about the same on 17,675 right now at 21:47 UTC. I expect them to sound better here a little later in the day. My plan is to listen to RA again next on 21,740 at 22:00 UTC. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:28:40 GMT, Telamon
wrote: Radio Australia much stronger on 9580 and 11880 than usual this morning and sounding like a local station with S10 level signals. New Zealand on the other hand weak and noisy but listen-able at 17:00 UTC. 1540z 13march2005 BBC 9740 +30/S9 R. Australia 9590 +10/S9 34, -118 R8B w/Preamp on |