Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bill frist is proabortion and a gun grabber!
I am fixin to make my usual afternoon trip over to the Goodwill thrift store now and flirt with them wimmins over there. cuhulin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... On 22 Apr 2005 10:15:09 -0700, "bpnjensen" wrote: Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Bruce Jensen These are not just religious crackpots. They are an organized conspiracy to overthrow the constitutional republic of the United States and institute Biblical law. They are very real. If the threat is real it ain't paranoia. http://www.theocracywatch.org/ What ever you say Alex. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "bpnjensen" wrote in message oups.com... Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Considering that the US is more secular and more tolerant now than at any time in the past, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. --Mike L. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:04:30 -0400, "Michael Lawson"
wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message roups.com... Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Considering that the US is more secular and more tolerant now than at any time in the past, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. --Mike L. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:04:30 -0400, "Michael Lawson" wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message roups.com... Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Considering that the US is more secular and more tolerant now than at any time in the past, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. --Mike L. Cat got your tongue David? Or are you still digesting the truth. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Lawson wrote:
"bpnjensen" wrote in message oups.com... Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Considering that the US is more secular and more tolerant now than at any time in the past, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. That's not the problem. The Christian fundie zealots are planning to seize power WITHOUT the consent of the general public. Most revolutions have had the support, either active or passive, of at least a plurality of the population. You need only look around you to see that rabid Christian zealots are not the norm, yet the small portion of the population who are rabid zealots want to use the mechanisms of democracy to seize power and then force their narrow interpretation of Biblical law on the rest of us without our consent. They want nothing less than a Christian Iran, with preachers and other self proclaimed "men of God" in power who will not be subject to anybody but God. Seeing that God isn't around to tell them what to do, they're free to go hog wild and make up their own version of Biblical law, then force it on an unwilling public. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() running dogg wrote: Michael Lawson wrote: "bpnjensen" wrote in message oups.com... Let's be absolutely clear - this does not mean all Christians. The majority of Christians in the US believe in gentle persuasion at worst and a true live-and-let-live attitude (as the Constitution encourages), as long as their own beliefs are not used against them. There are crackpots in every religion. They are not the norm. Yes, we need to be cautious, but no, we do not need to be paranoid. I refuse to be worried to distraction by any group. Considering that the US is more secular and more tolerant now than at any time in the past, I'd say you hit the nail on the head. That's not the problem. The Christian fundie zealots are planning to seize power WITHOUT the consent of the general public. Most revolutions have had the support, either active or passive, of at least a plurality of the population. You need only look around you to see that rabid Christian zealots are not the norm, yet the small portion of the population who are rabid zealots want to use the mechanisms of democracy to seize power and then force their narrow interpretation of Biblical law on the rest of us without our consent. They want nothing less than a Christian Iran, with preachers and other self proclaimed "men of God" in power who will not be subject to anybody but God. Seeing that God isn't around to tell them what to do, they're free to go hog wild and make up their own version of Biblical law, then force it on an unwilling public. Sheesh... you are one screwed up 'tard boy. Please, continue to tote. dxAce Michigan USA |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:27:36 -0700, running dogg wrote:
That's not the problem. The Christian fundie zealots are planning to seize power WITHOUT the consent of the general public. Most revolutions have had the support, either active or passive, of at least a plurality of the population. You need only look around you to see that rabid Christian zealots are not the norm, yet the small portion of the population who are rabid zealots want to use the mechanisms of democracy to seize power and then force their narrow interpretation of Biblical law on the rest of us without our consent. They want nothing less than a Christian Iran, with preachers and other self proclaimed "men of God" in power who will not be subject to anybody but God. Seeing that God isn't around to tell them what to do, they're free to go hog wild and make up their own version of Biblical law, then force it on an unwilling public. I see absolutely no difference between FRC and Focus on the Family and the Taliban or the Saudi Religious Police. None. They should shut up or die. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 13:27:36 -0700, running dogg wrote: That's not the problem. The Christian fundie zealots are planning to seize power WITHOUT the consent of the general public. Most revolutions have had the support, either active or passive, of at least a plurality of the population. You need only look around you to see that rabid Christian zealots are not the norm, yet the small portion of the population who are rabid zealots want to use the mechanisms of democracy to seize power and then force their narrow interpretation of Biblical law on the rest of us without our consent. They want nothing less than a Christian Iran, with preachers and other self proclaimed "men of God" in power who will not be subject to anybody but God. Seeing that God isn't around to tell them what to do, they're free to go hog wild and make up their own version of Biblical law, then force it on an unwilling public. I see absolutely no difference between FRC and Focus on the Family and the Taliban or the Saudi Religious Police. None. They should shut up or die. Might you consider the same, 'tard? dxAce Michigan USA |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a big difference between the FRC/FOTF and the Taliban. The US
gave the Taliban multi-millions of dollars, while the FRC and FOTF just get big tax write-offs. Also, the US took care of the Taliban problem to some degree, but tolerates and in fact encourages hate groups like the FRC and FOTF. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Voice of America used to emanate from Dixon | Broadcasting | |||
(OT) - Can America (USofA) Still"BE" America ? | Shortwave | |||
Voice of America used to emanate from Dixon | Shortwave | |||
NASB DRM transmissions to North America | Shortwave | |||
Air America - where every flight crashes | Shortwave |