| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
May 3rd 05, 07:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"David Eduardo" wrote in message .. . "David" wrote in message ... On Sat, 30 Apr 2005 23:41:08 GMT, (Don Worsham) wrote: I live in LA and AA has a good signal. The latest LA rating reported this past week was takes during the wind down of the Xtra sports format to be of any use fin judging the size of the AA audience in LA. Maybe in the city limits, but KTLK doesn't even cover all of L. A. County. Actually, the 5 mv/m primary coverage includes all of LA County except the High Desert (which only one LA station covers well) and most of the OC, all the way down beyond Irvine. It operates with the highest power permissable, 50,000 watts, during daytime hours. It shares the KTNQ transmitter site, and has 5/8 wavelenght towers, making for great efficiency. As far as NYC goes, all I know is what I read in the funny papers (and on the internets). Sources noted above. Those ratings were over a year old. He dosent care, as long as it satifies his agenda. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| City moving into 700 Mhz range | Scanner | |||
| Mid to late 1940's New York City Radio | Broadcasting | |||
| Mid to late 1940's New York City Radio | Broadcasting | |||
| Geller Media | Broadcasting | |||
| Boosting Scanner Recption for New York City Subway Frequencies | Scanner | |||
Hybrid Mode
