LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old May 9th 05, 06:53 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If ESSB is nothing more than wider bandwidth, I don't see it as much of
an innovation. They could have made the bandwidth wider years ago.

Art Bell mentioned several times that ESSB gets rid of the Donald Duck
sound to sideband. However, you get the Donald Duck sound when there is
a frequency offset rather than bandwidth limiting.

Like land, they aren't making any more bandwidth. Seems to me we should
conserve bandwidth.



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BETTER HF FREQUENCY PLAN for AMATEUR RADIO Expeditionradio Policy 3 January 27th 04 10:50 PM
Mode for Best Throughput? Andy Knitt Digital 0 November 5th 03 02:56 AM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 10 October 23rd 03 07:59 PM
Icom T2H ANI Mode Michael Ko Equipment 0 October 9th 03 09:13 PM
CCIR Coefficients METHOD 6 REC533 // AUCKLAND --> SEATTLE http://CBC.am/ Shortwave 0 July 16th 03 08:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017