|
Dave Holford wrote:
David wrote: On 11 May 2005 22:42:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: I don't have anything o hide; hence, I have no problem at all with RID. -=jd=- That is traitorous speech. The state has no right to know your business, legal or not. The more they know the more they control. Too late. I recently attended a presentation by a gentleman who consults for the NSA, FBI, CIA, RCMP, CSIS etc. It is way too late! Don't turn your cell phone on! Dave I believe it was Joyce and Dave who, this morning - 5/13/05, were talking about "chips" in the chips at Las Vegas! They can tell exactly who every chip is issued to and they can tell every where you go while on the premises. Gillette was planning months ago to put them in every razor and possibly even in the packs of blades. Seems Michelin tires have had them installed for months now - in every tire. They're laying this foundation one little stone at a time. How long before they embed readers into the pavement - at least at major intersections - so they can tell: 1) Every where you go - some places will soon become "off limits". 2) How long you stayed - thus allowing for what may or may not have transpired there. 3) How long it took you to get there - possibly a speeding ticket by mail, or email - or an automatic draft from your banking account. All governments are forever needing more money, you know. 4) Whether you crossed the center line while getting from point a to point b. More fund raising! 5) Whether any of your driving was erratic. More fund raising! There are perhaps millions of possibilities. When even a pencil or pen has an RFID chip in it and the government knows who it is "assigned" to. Two people meet to transact business and one party uses the others pen, forgetting to give it back. Later a crime is committed - or someone suspects that a crime *may* have been committed - and party A's pen is found at the scene. ...... It's going to fun, isn't it? :-) "Mother, May I?" |
-=jd=- wrote: On Fri 13 May 2005 10:02:13a, dxAce wrote in message : David wrote: On 12 May 2005 21:17:07 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Thu 12 May 2005 09:32:04a, David wrote in message : On 11 May 2005 22:42:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: I don't have anything o hide; hence, I have no problem at all with RID. -=jd=- That is traitorous speech. The state has no right to know your business, legal or not. The more they know the more they control. OK, Here's your big chance - Explain the logic and fear underlying your conclusion: "The more they know the more they control". -=jd=- Scroll down to the big blue meatball: http://www.geocities.com/totalinformationawareness/ How many days in a row have you awoken only to find yourself even more screwed up than you were the day before, 'tard boy? That's an incredibly flawed presumption. What makes you think he's capable of keeping track? I rather think his reality is one skewed fantasy blurring into another... My mistake! I'll have to rethink my theory. dxAce Michigan USA |
I recently attended a presentation by a gentleman who consults for the NSA, FBI, CIA, RCMP, CSIS etc. It is way too late! Don't turn your cell phone on! And this would impact me... how? What do I have to worry about? I know what you're angling for, I just want to see how far you are willing to stretch to reach it... -=jd=- Sorry, I don't fish and I have no idea what you think I am stretching for. Dave |
dxAce wrote: Yeah, there is definitely a colour problem on that page. Colour? |
Dave Holford wrote: dxAce wrote: Yeah, there is definitely a colour problem on that page. Colour? Oh sorry... didn't realize you didn't understand English. dxAce Michigan USA |
dxAce wrote: Dave Holford wrote: dxAce wrote: Yeah, there is definitely a colour problem on that page. Colour? Oh sorry... didn't realize you didn't understand English. dxAce Michigan USA Didn't expect you to use a Canadian dictionary. |
Dave Holford wrote: dxAce wrote: Dave Holford wrote: dxAce wrote: Yeah, there is definitely a colour problem on that page. Colour? Oh sorry... didn't realize you didn't understand English. dxAce Michigan USA Didn't expect you to use a Canadian dictionary. No such thing. Even if there were, no one up there would know how to use it. Get over it. dxAce Michigan USA |
On 13 May 2005 18:58:11 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Fri 13 May 2005 08:55:42a, David wrote in message : On 12 May 2005 21:17:07 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Thu 12 May 2005 09:32:04a, David wrote in message : On 11 May 2005 22:42:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: I don't have anything o hide; hence, I have no problem at all with RID. -=jd=- That is traitorous speech. The state has no right to know your business, legal or not. The more they know the more they control. OK, Here's your big chance - Explain the logic and fear underlying your conclusion: "The more they know the more they control". -=jd=- Scroll down to the big blue meatball: http://www.geocities.com/totalinformationawareness/ Well, Let's see... you didn't copy & paste the article and only copy & pasted the link. At least you didn't dissappoint us - I told you (and everyone else) that you are wholly incapable of articulating an intelligent response in support of your kook assertions. So, we'll call this a "Do-Over" because that link didn't explain the logic and fear underlying your conclusion: "The more they know the more they control". Here's opportunity #2 to prove you're more than a mere liberal parrot. I'll even rephrase it to make it easier to understand by someone of your limited "copy & paste" capabilities: Why should I, or anyone I know, be the least bit concerned about RFID? -=jd=- Liberal? I'm an old-school right-winger. Bill Cooper. Barry Goldwater. The problem with you Hitle---er--Bush apologists is that you are too quick to dismiss. |
David wrote: On 13 May 2005 18:58:11 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Fri 13 May 2005 08:55:42a, David wrote in message : On 12 May 2005 21:17:07 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: On Thu 12 May 2005 09:32:04a, David wrote in message : On 11 May 2005 22:42:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: I don't have anything o hide; hence, I have no problem at all with RID. -=jd=- That is traitorous speech. The state has no right to know your business, legal or not. The more they know the more they control. OK, Here's your big chance - Explain the logic and fear underlying your conclusion: "The more they know the more they control". -=jd=- Scroll down to the big blue meatball: http://www.geocities.com/totalinformationawareness/ Well, Let's see... you didn't copy & paste the article and only copy & pasted the link. At least you didn't dissappoint us - I told you (and everyone else) that you are wholly incapable of articulating an intelligent response in support of your kook assertions. So, we'll call this a "Do-Over" because that link didn't explain the logic and fear underlying your conclusion: "The more they know the more they control". Here's opportunity #2 to prove you're more than a mere liberal parrot. I'll even rephrase it to make it easier to understand by someone of your limited "copy & paste" capabilities: Why should I, or anyone I know, be the least bit concerned about RFID? -=jd=- Liberal? I'm an old-school right-winger. Bill Cooper. Barry Goldwater. The problem with you Hitle---er--Bush apologists is that you are too quick to dismiss. David Rickets wakes up to yet another day of mental retardation. dxAce Michigan USA |
It's puzzling to me... this forum for discussion so easily turns into
a trading venue for slander. I'm telling you, the thouhtful ones, don't get lured in by the mind-numbed nonsense. Darren |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com