In article .com,
wrote:

I have a Trompeter PDF tittled "Getting Reday for HDTV". Up unitl the
last few years it was common practice to use 50 Ohm male and female
BNCs in 75 Ohm systems. With a maximum frequency of under 5MHz the
mismatch had ":no" effect. Trompeter arns that older 75 Ohm patch
bays will not pass DTV signals, which can reach up to 1GHz, with
"serious distortion".

I have tried to find a link at Trompoeter, but haven't succeded yet.

These pages shows the difference between 50 and 75 Ohm BNC
connectors. http://sosnick.uchicago.edu/BNC_50_75.html
http://www.levitonvoicedata.com/supp...ote_detail.asp
?tnID=17 5

Almost all of the "older" professional video gear used 50 Ohm BNCs
this

includes Grass VallyD2, BetaCam(BetaCam digital uses real 75 Ohm
BNC), U-matic and Ampex quad and 1".

A local TV station had a major nightmare with their ~20 year old
Trompeter video patch bay. On pass through wouldn't kill the DTV
signal, put a 2nd pass and the video died.

A chief engineer explained that 50 Ohm connectors where "much less
expensive then 75 Ohms" This link gives a 5:1 price differeintial:
http://www.extron.com/technology/arc...tifyingcables1

So in short, if your male BNC has plastic shell on the inside of the
mating fingers it is 50 Ohm, if the female BNC has a plastic collar
around the center pin it is 50 Ohms.

For HF connections I think it is safe to say it will make no
differnce if eith4r 50 or 75 Ohm BNC connector is used. If only
HDTV/DTV were so tolerant, On the good side for us is the fact that
older, but perfectly

good NTSC "75" Ohnm video patch bays will become available on the
surplus market. I was given an older Trompeter 75 Ohm video patch bay
because of the 50 Ohm BNCs. Good deal for me!

Amphenol:http://www.amphenolrf.com/rf_made_si...hquestions.asp
says" At frequencies below 500 Mhz or so, 50 ohm connectors can be
used on 75 ohm cable (and vice versa) with acceptable performance
levels. The reason for doing this is that 50 ohm connectors are
generally less expensive due to their greater usage. Click here to
see a list of useful..."

This thread ought to be interesting......

What are you looking for? Do you want an explanation of why the
connector does not have a big effect on a 100MHz signal and yet has a
great effect on a 1 GHz signal for the same impedance mismatch?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote:

What are you looking for? Do you want an explanation of why the
connector does not have a big effect on a 100MHz signal and yet has a
great effect on a 1 GHz signal for the same impedance mismatch?


Have you ever used a TDR to look at a transmission line? A 1.5:1
impedance bump can cause problems and the more impedance bumps in the
path the more it degrades the signal.

The techs at Microdyne had both 50 and 75 ohm cables and adapters
available. I had someone tell me the video boards i had just tested and
calibrated were all bad. He was trying to use 50 Ohm cables in a 75 ohm
video test which caused the bandwidth to roll off to -3 dB at 16 Mhz
instead of 20 Mhz. It took all day to convince the old timers that they
had to use the right cables, because they had got away with the wrong
coax on the older, 5 Mhz systems for years.

--
Former professional electron wrangler.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida

In article ,
"Michael A. Terrell" wrote:

Telamon wrote:

What are you looking for? Do you want an explanation of why the
connector does not have a big effect on a 100MHz signal and yet has a
great effect on a 1 GHz signal for the same impedance mismatch?


Have you ever used a TDR to look at a transmission line? A 1.5:1
impedance bump can cause problems and the more impedance bumps in the
path the more it degrades the signal.

Yes. Time domain reflectometry.

The techs at Microdyne had both 50 and 75 ohm cables and adapters
available. I had someone tell me the video boards i had just tested and
calibrated were all bad. He was trying to use 50 Ohm cables in a 75 ohm
video test which caused the bandwidth to roll off to -3 dB at 16 Mhz
instead of 20 Mhz. It took all day to convince the old timers that they
had to use the right cables, because they had got away with the wrong
coax on the older, 5 Mhz systems for years.

You need more bandwidth for digital signals because of the faster rise
and fall times. For data to be valid you need a large eye opening in
amplitude and time for margin.

There are two things of significance:
1. The amplitude of the discontinuity.
2. The length of time of the discontinuity.

#1 determines the amplitude of the reflection.
#2 determined the frequency it becomes significant.

The cable is another issue. I know you understand that the attenuation
per foot increases with higher frequency. This can occur more rapidly
with digital signals due to the faster than analog transition times. For
digital you need a path with 3.5 times the bandwidth.

You have to understand another consequence of reflections on a
transmission line and that is the amplitude of the signal varies over
the length of the line due to constructive and destructive interference
of the forward and reverse waves so it is possible to measure a bigger
swing than you set the generator to drive the line with in some places
on the line. I have seen this confound more than one person until I
explain this to them.

To test a path the best thing to do is set the generator to produce a
1/0 pattern, which is the highest frequency of the bit stream and look
at the far end with a scope. Swap the cable or connector and measure
the change in attenuation.

If the impedance of the cable is wrong you will lose signal amplitude
due to reflection along with the loss per foot number.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon wrote (in part):

You need more bandwidth for digital signals because of the faster rise
and fall times. For data to be valid you need a large eye opening in
amplitude and time for margin.

There are two things of significance:
1. The amplitude of the discontinuity.
2. The length of time of the discontinuity.

#1 determines the amplitude of the reflection.
#2 determined the frequency it becomes significant.
--------------------------------------
I started this thread because starting now and increasingly
in the near future there will be "lots" of analog "75 Ohm" video
patch bays, and patch hairpins, and patch cables dumped as the
older ones degrade digital signals. At one local station they found
out they could go through one set normally normaled analog patch.
Inserting eithr a hairpin, short patch used to connect adjacent non
normally connected patches, or any patch cable "killed" the digital
data stream.

I was given a~25 year old 48 bay patch with hairpins and cables.
And while my current antenna system is "50 ohms", this bay passes
signals in the .1`~30MHz range with "no" attenuation. By "no", I can
dirrectly feed the attenuated output from my ancient HP test generator,
adjust it for a just audible signal, then run it through the patchbay,
and it
is still there.

Beats the heck out of my homebuilt BNC bay, and I can now seperate
my receivers from my transceivers.

I did a quick search and found Prompeter 75 ohm patch bays on Ebay
for less then $20. For anyone with a mix of receivers, converters,
filters,
and antennas, this could be a very cost effective routing solution.

And for those who think that their SW receiver antenna input,
rated at 50 ohms, is really 50 Ohms, all I can say is "not very
likely".

As to the mismatch of using a 75 Ohm patch in a 50 ohm system,
I can run 146MHz through a patch set, terminate it in a Narda 50
Ohm load, and I can not measure any increase in VSWR. This is at
low power and one of my main reasons for wanting to not use my BNC
bay is to avoid, or at least decrease the chance of feeding the output
of my IC28A, or HTX100 directly into a receiver. While I haven't
managed it, I know one friend who did.

Terry

It's a total joke to assume the input to any receiver, amp, whatever,
is 50 ohms over all frequencies.

About the only thing I ever found to be 50 ohms over a wide frequency
range is the calibration resistor used in the impedance jig. Chip
resistors are quite good, but their self inductance is basically their
electrical length.

wrote:

It's a total joke to assume the input to any receiver, amp, whatever,
is 50 ohms over all frequencies.

Isn't that why it's known as 'nominal' impedence?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

This weekend I hope to have a chance to measure and
graph the actual input impedance of several popular
receivers.

This relates back to our thread on using 75 Ohm coax
instead of 50 Ohm.

Terry

Yes, nominal is the proper weasel word.

I wonder if the PL259/S0259 combo is worse than using a 75 ohm BNC?

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

wrote:

It's a total joke to assume the input to any receiver, amp, whatever,
is 50 ohms over all frequencies.

Isn't that why it's known as 'nominal' impedence?

Yes.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

In article .com,
wrote:

Telamon wrote (in part):

You need more bandwidth for digital signals because of the faster rise
and fall times. For data to be valid you need a large eye opening in
amplitude and time for margin.

There are two things of significance:
1. The amplitude of the discontinuity.
2. The length of time of the discontinuity.

#1 determines the amplitude of the reflection.
#2 determined the frequency it becomes significant.
--------------------------------------
I started this thread because starting now and increasingly
in the near future there will be "lots" of analog "75 Ohm" video
patch bays, and patch hairpins, and patch cables dumped as the
older ones degrade digital signals. At one local station they found
out they could go through one set normally normaled analog patch.
Inserting eithr a hairpin, short patch used to connect adjacent non
normally connected patches, or any patch cable "killed" the digital
data stream.

I was given a~25 year old 48 bay patch with hairpins and cables.
And while my current antenna system is "50 ohms", this bay passes
signals in the .1`~30MHz range with "no" attenuation. By "no", I can
dirrectly feed the attenuated output from my ancient HP test generator,
adjust it for a just audible signal, then run it through the patchbay,
and it
is still there.

Beats the heck out of my homebuilt BNC bay, and I can now seperate
my receivers from my transceivers.

I did a quick search and found Prompeter 75 ohm patch bays on Ebay
for less then $20. For anyone with a mix of receivers, converters,
filters,
and antennas, this could be a very cost effective routing solution.

And for those who think that their SW receiver antenna input,
rated at 50 ohms, is really 50 Ohms, all I can say is "not very
likely".

As to the mismatch of using a 75 Ohm patch in a 50 ohm system,
I can run 146MHz through a patch set, terminate it in a Narda 50
Ohm load, and I can not measure any increase in VSWR. This is at
low power and one of my main reasons for wanting to not use my BNC
bay is to avoid, or at least decrease the chance of feeding the output
of my IC28A, or HTX100 directly into a receiver. While I haven't
managed it, I know one friend who did.

You mentioned a TDR earlier in the thread. You would certainly see the
difference in cables impedance will that instrument.

I would not buy 75 ohm cable but if you have it for free or very low
cost I would use it.

You will be losing some signal with the 75 ohm cable but not a lot and
maybe not enough for you to notice under most circumstances. The
exception would be a very weak signal on the bottom end of what your
radio can manage to pick up.

Keep in mind that the meter on the radio covers its dynamic range and
that you need a significant change in signal level to see it in the
meters 120 dB range depending on the radio. The range is something like
..1uV to a few hundreds of mV.

The impedance of the radios input will change depending on frequency.
The radios input usually has some type of transformer/Balun on the input
so as you go from low to high frequency you will see the impedance swing
from much lower to much higher then 50 ohms. This low to high swing will
repeat over and over again as you go from 3 to 30MHz. This low to high
swing will keep crossing through 50 ohms though, which is its intrinsic
impedance. The intrinsic non-reactive part of the measurement will be
close to 50 ohms.

This is one reason that you need to check a number of frequencies when
comparing radio sensitivity due to this changing input impedance
changing over the band. A receivers input sensitivity will bobble up and
down over the band.

Your test with the handy talky is seeing the nice 50 ohm load on the end
of the cable. You should be able to see the difference better with an
antenna analyzer that can measure the resistance and reactance
separately. Another possibility is that the length of cable you used in
the test was not significant verses the frequency. Since the line is not
flat you will get a different response depending on the test frequency
or the length of the cable.

As an experiment maybe connect a section of 50 ohm cable to a piece of
75 ohm cable and then the 50 ohm load will allow the meter in the handy
talky to show the reflection. A low power test is just as valid as a
high power test for VSWR as long as it is enough power for the meter
circuit to operate accurately, which should be the situation.

***********************************
Well anyway you are trying to discern if using the 75 ohm cable is going
to make a difference in what you can hear and most of the time it
probably won't make enough of a difference for you to notice if you are
just using the radio. Use an antenna analyzer or TDR or any other
instrument that can measure voltage and phase and you will be able to
see a difference though.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California