Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
running dogg wrote:
I'm sure many people here have been following the riots in the Muslim world that occurred when the US newsmagazine Newsweek reported that American interrogators at Gitmo had flushed a Quran down a toilet in order to "rattle" the prisoners. Turns out that the "Pentagon confirmed" report was untrue. Their source was wrong. All a spokesman for Newsweek could say was the equivalent of "oops". "Words have consequences", he told the American TV network ABC. 16 people have died in the riots and Muslim clerics are now calling for a holy war against modern civilization. The problem is, Bush really believes that it IS a holy war, Christianity vs Islam, may the best God win... {snippage} As far as abrupt, disconnected seques go, that one was a doozy! You acknowledge that Newsweek irresponsibly reported a story they did not try to confirm based on an anonymous source that could be Pentagon based... or could be based out of their own editorial dept! Heck as long as they were making it up, I don't see why they didn't attribute the information to a "White House Source"! It could almost be argued that their erroneous reporting was criminal in nature since it sparked a reaction leading to multiple deaths. You acknowledge that unidentified Muslim Clerics are now calling for a holy war against modern civilization, yet you are demonstrably gullible enough to believe this is a recent occurrence. Are you truly unaware that "Muslim Clerics" have been calling for Jihad against modern/western society for decades? You are either laughably gullible -OR- you have a blind hatred for Bush that precludes your ability to understand the full extent of the islamic extremist opinion of infidels such as yourself. What's even *more* humorous is that you appear to think those same islamic extremists would behave, believe and/or treat you any differently based on who was leading the U.S., or any other modern western govt. So in an effort to reduce your post to its core point, correct me if the following is not spot-on: "Newsweek irresponsibly published a made-up a story and people were killed; ergo, Bush is bad". Do you think this crap up all on your own, or ar you ripping it off of some "DNC-Leg-Humping" blog site? -=jd=- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Get into the real arena | Antenna | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Dx |