Massacre in Uzbekistan
 

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?
While Bush cruises towards an anti-American revolution in Uzbekistan
that will severely hinder our ability to fight Al Qaeda, the American
public is kept in the dark. Meanwhile, the Uzbeks are vowing revenge.
Stay tuned...


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan.




http://www.northstarcompass.org/nsc0307/uzbek.htm
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article...615294,00.html
http://www.gnn.tv/headlines/2931/Dissident_Casserole
http://www.muslimwakeup.com/main/arc...the_new_sa.php


gruesome pictures:

http://www.informationclearinghouse....rticle3943.htm

running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?
While Bush cruises towards an anti-American revolution in Uzbekistan
that will severely hinder our ability to fight Al Qaeda, the American
public is kept in the dark. Meanwhile, the Uzbeks are vowing revenge.
Stay tuned...

It's always Bush's fault isn't it, 'tard boy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

One simple answer; If we don't the Communists will. It is called
real-politicks.
Witness the Chinese Communists support of regimes in Sudan, Iraq, Iran,
N.Korea, Burma, to name just a few.
Read some history, pull out a map and stick some red pins in it and a
pattern will emerge.

In a region of strategic resource importance right next door to two of the
worlds most pro-Communist regimes it is unfortunately a fact of
real-politicks. Read some history of Marx, Lenin and Mao and the Chi-Comms
desire to choke off access to vital resources to the west.

It isn't conspiracy theory it is fact.

"running dogg" wrote in message
...
For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?
While Bush cruises towards an anti-American revolution in Uzbekistan
that will severely hinder our ability to fight Al Qaeda, the American
public is kept in the dark. Meanwhile, the Uzbeks are vowing revenge.
Stay tuned...


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News=
=----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.


While Bush cruises towards an anti-American revolution in Uzbekistan
that will severely hinder our ability to fight Al Qaeda, the American
public is kept in the dark. Meanwhile, the Uzbeks are vowing revenge.
Stay tuned...

It's always Bush's fault isn't it, 'tard boy?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'... it's all
Bush's fault...

Yeah, right.

Take your pills, 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'... it's all
Bush's fault...

Yeah, right.

Take your pills, 'tard.

Additionally, you and your fellow 'tards are going to wake up on what is it?,
January 20, 2009?, and have to start scrambling around for someone, or something
new to bitch about. It's going to be hilarious watching you try to once again get
your bearings.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's
major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but
we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and
has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of
trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in
Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'...
it's all
Bush's fault...

So it's ok for a government to massacre it's people? Did anyone tell that
to Bush before he invaded Iraq? According to the pro-wra, pro-Bush crowd it
was bad that Saddam killed his own. So which is it?


Yeah, right.

Take your pills, 'tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's
major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but
we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and
has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of
trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in
Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'...
it's all
Bush's fault...

So it's ok for a government to massacre it's people? Did anyone tell that
to Bush before he invaded Iraq? According to the pro-wra, pro-Bush crowd it
was bad that Saddam killed his own. So which is it?

As I stated earlier 'tard, take your pills, and try to find a clue.

Boggling.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has
been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's
major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died,
but
we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area
and
has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of
trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is
this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US,
and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in
Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to
protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'...
it's all
Bush's fault...

So it's ok for a government to massacre it's people? Did anyone tell
that
to Bush before he invaded Iraq? According to the pro-wra, pro-Bush crowd
it
was bad that Saddam killed his own. So which is it?

As I stated earlier 'tard, take your pills, and try to find a clue.

Boggling.

I'll take that as a "I don't know, FDR"


dxAce
Michigan
USA

FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


FDR wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


running dogg wrote:

For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has
been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's
major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died,
but
we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area
and
has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of
trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is
this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US,
and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in
Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to
protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?

It's called hypocrisy.

Yeah, and of course none of it is the fault of the 'restless crowd'...
it's all
Bush's fault...

So it's ok for a government to massacre it's people? Did anyone tell
that
to Bush before he invaded Iraq? According to the pro-wra, pro-Bush crowd
it
was bad that Saddam killed his own. So which is it?

As I stated earlier 'tard, take your pills, and try to find a clue.

Boggling.

I'll take that as a "I don't know, FDR"

Figures, 'tard boy. Now go find something to tote.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

Figures, 'tard boy. Now go find something to tote.


yawn...must..keep eyes open..must keep..yawn..snore...

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

Figures, 'tard boy. Now go find something to tote.

yawn...must..keep eyes open..must keep..yawn..snore...

CanaDuh is pretty boring isn't it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"running dogg" wrote in message
...
For several days the lead story on the BBC's The World Today has been
about the massacre in Andijan, Uzbekistan. Short version: thousands
gathered in the center of town to protest the arrest of the town's major
business leaders on terrorism charges; crowd got restless, soldiers
fired on them. Anywhere from 300 to 1000 innocent civilians died, but we
don't know for sure since the Uzbek govt has sealed off the area and has
forbidden journalists from going there. Anecdotal reports tell of trucks
filled with bodies, of school gyms piled high with bodies. Why is this
important to Americans? The Uzbek govt is a strong ally of the US, and
America has a big base in the country to supply our guys in Afghanistan.
Is it just coincidence that coverage of all this in the US domestic
media has been limited? Why does the Bu****e US media want to protect
the US public from the fact that we support a regime that has just
murdered hundreds of its own people in the name of fighting terror?
While Bush cruises towards an anti-American revolution in Uzbekistan
that will severely hinder our ability to fight Al Qaeda, the American
public is kept in the dark. Meanwhile, the Uzbeks are vowing revenge.
Stay tuned...



Hey! Two Doggs. Don't you have any friends?

B.H.

dxAce wrote:

yawn...must..keep eyes open..must keep..yawn..snore...


CanaDuh is pretty boring isn't it?


The only thing boring here is television and your posts, of which I am one of
the very few importers. I will try marketing them as a non chemical sedative as
soon as I figure out how to package them without getting drowsy or lethargic.

I kicked the television habit a few years ago. You I keep around to serve as an
example of how an education system can be be completely rotted from the inside
out yet somehow remain standing. Cuhulin, beerbarrel Fort and you being good
examples of what they churn out. Tad Early was certainly an exception, but I
think he may have had tutoring or at least traveled outside of Toad Suck,
Arkansas and the country.





mike

m II wrote:

I kicked the television habit a few years ago.

Seems as though you still have a few other bad habits to kick. Like I suggested
earlier, 'tard boy, best you go wait in line at your nearest Health CanaDuh
facility and seek some help.

Be sure to take something to tote whilst you wait on line.

And please, leave the shortwave to the big boys.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:


I kicked the television habit a few years ago.


Seems as though you still have a few other bad habits to kick. Like I suggested
earlier, 'tard boy, best you go wait in line at your nearest Health CanaDuh
facility and seek some help.

Be sure to take something to tote whilst you wait on line.
And please, leave the shortwave to the big boys.


How does turning a radio dial make you a man, you dimwitted Bozo? I'm starting
to see why you never married. It appears you lost all interest in womankind when
you got your first Drake. Not surprisingly, a Drake is a *MALE* duck, which
brings into question your obvious leanings toward a Cuhulinesque perversion and
trans species homosexuality.

go play with your knob, 'vert boy.




mike

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:


I kicked the television habit a few years ago.


Seems as though you still have a few other bad habits to kick. Like I suggested
earlier, 'tard boy, best you go wait in line at your nearest Health CanaDuh
facility and seek some help.

Be sure to take something to tote whilst you wait on line.
And please, leave the shortwave to the big boys.

How does turning a radio dial make you a man, you dimwitted Bozo? I'm starting
to see why you never married. It appears you lost all interest in womankind when
you got your first Drake. Not surprisingly, a Drake is a *MALE* duck, which
brings into question your obvious leanings toward a Cuhulinesque perversion and
trans species homosexuality.

I get the strangest feeling that you know all about homosexuality, 'tard.

Once again, Health CanaDuh may just be able to provide youwith the counseling you
need.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

m II wrote:


I kicked the television habit a few years ago.


Seems as though you still have a few other bad habits to kick. Like I suggested
earlier, 'tard boy, best you go wait in line at your nearest Health CanaDuh
facility and seek some help.

Be sure to take something to tote whilst you wait on line.
And please, leave the shortwave to the big boys.

How does turning a radio dial make you a man, you dimwitted Bozo? I'm starting
to see why you never married. It appears you lost all interest in womankind when
you got your first Drake. Not surprisingly, a Drake is a *MALE* duck, which
brings into question your obvious leanings toward a Cuhulinesque perversion and
trans species homosexuality.

I get the strangest feeling that you know all about homosexuality, 'tard.

Once again, Health CanaDuh may just be able to provide youwith the counseling you
need.

Look here, I even looked up the web site for you:

http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/

dxAce
Michigan
USA

beerbarrel wrote:

On Sat, 21 May 2005 14:07:11 GMT, m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

yawn...must..keep eyes open..must keep..yawn..snore...


CanaDuh is pretty boring isn't it?


The only thing boring here is television and your posts, of which I am one of
the very few importers. I will try marketing them as a non chemical sedative as
soon as I figure out how to package them without getting drowsy or lethargic.

I kicked the television habit a few years ago. You I keep around to serve as an
example of how an education system can be be completely rotted from the inside
out yet somehow remain standing. Cuhulin, beerbarrel Fort and you being good
examples of what they churn out. Tad Early was certainly an exception, but I
think he may have had tutoring or at least traveled outside of Toad Suck,
Arkansas and the country.





mike

I love how he can't make a post w/o leaving me out. I had no idea he
was that attached!

Guess it's pretty lonely up there in CanaDuh.

(That, along with being a 'tard)

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...

Maybe the honkee misses the honkus!

Does this sound familiar? It ought to; you said it:

I love how he can't make a post w/o leaving me out. I had no idea he
was that attached!

Idiot.

Honus wrote:

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...

Maybe the honkee misses the honkus!

Does this sound familiar? It ought to; you said it:

I love how he can't make a post w/o leaving me out. I had no idea he
was that attached!

Idiot.

Identifying with the 'Honkus' moniker now?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Honus wrote:

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...

Maybe the honkee misses the honkus!

Does this sound familiar? It ought to; you said it:

I love how he can't make a post w/o leaving me out. I had no idea
he
was that attached!

Idiot.

Identifying with the 'Honkus' moniker now?

Just like you identify with dxAss. Don't read more into then there is.

Honus wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Honus wrote:

"beerbarrel" wrote in message
...

Maybe the honkee misses the honkus!

Does this sound familiar? It ought to; you said it:

I love how he can't make a post w/o leaving me out. I had no idea
he
was that attached!

Idiot.

Identifying with the 'Honkus' moniker now?

Just like you identify with dxAss. Don't read more into then there is.

Even as dxAss I do pretty well!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Honus wrote:

Just like you identify with dxAss. Don't read more into then there is.


He readily answers to 'Bozo', also.

It seems you can call him anything you want, just don't call him late for dinner...





mike

dxAce wrote:

Even as dxAss I do pretty well!


That's due to the well worn sphincter, Bozo..





mike

"m II" wrote in message
news:F1Sje.10198$tt5.4730@edtnps90...
dxAce wrote:

Even as dxAss I do pretty well!


That's due to the well worn sphincter, Bozo..

mike


I'd be real careful about introducing the term sphincter into a shortwave
radio forum. Those so inclined to experiment may purchase electro/mechanical
stimuli. Thus possibly introducing more TVI into the HF spectrum. Try to be
more careful next time. Thank you.

B.H.

Brian Hill wrote:

I'd be real careful about introducing the term sphincter into a shortwave
radio forum. Those so inclined to experiment may purchase electro/mechanical
stimuli. Thus possibly introducing more TVI into the HF spectrum. Try to be
more careful next time. Thank you.

Why, soitenly...but shouldn't that be TVI in the HF RECTUM? nyuk nyuk....



I can just see the Ace all lit up like a Christmas tree


larry, moe, curly and mike

m II wrote:

Honus wrote:

Just like you identify with dxAss. Don't read more into then there is.

He readily answers to 'Bozo', also.

It seems you can call him anything you want, just don't call him late for dinner...

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...i?ArtNum=88501

One of my favourite lines in the article: "Plainly the two things
Canada needs most are a mirror and a good psychiatrist".

Enjoy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

CanaDuh Sucks.

m II wrote:

Brian Hill wrote:

I'd be real careful about introducing the term sphincter into a shortwave
radio forum. Those so inclined to experiment may purchase electro/mechanical
stimuli. Thus possibly introducing more TVI into the HF spectrum. Try to be
more careful next time. Thank you.

Why, soitenly...but shouldn't that be TVI in the HF RECTUM? nyuk nyuk....

Lets see, navels and rectums... not much else to contemplate up there in CanaDuh,
is there, 'tard boy?

Have some poutain and be a good Canucky and shut the hell up!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

CanaDuh sucks.

dxAce wrote:

Have some poutain and be a good Canucky and shut the hell up!


Why can't you stop insulting people? You are indeed a sorry little man.







mike

dxAce wrote:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...i?ArtNum=88501

One of my favourite lines in the article: "Plainly the two things
Canada needs most are a mirror and a good psychiatrist".

Enjoy.

Perhaps it does. If so, Washington needs a huge enema, you sorry little man.







mike

m II whined:

dxAce wrote:

Have some poutain and be a good Canucky and shut the hell up!

Why can't you stop insulting people? You are indeed a sorry little man.

Awww... the poor little Canucky 'tard... Wahhhhhhhhhhhh....

Stuff a sock in it, boy.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

m II wrote:

dxAce wrote:

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...i?ArtNum=88501

One of my favourite lines in the article: "Plainly the two things
Canada needs most are a mirror and a good psychiatrist".

Enjoy.

Perhaps it does. If so, Washington needs a huge enema, you sorry little man.

They'll be sure to flush in the direction of Ottawa, you sorry little Canuck.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

beerbarrel wrote:

Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black!


Stuff a sock in it, toting hypocrite 'tard boy.






mike

m II wrote:

beerbarrel wrote:

Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black!

Stuff a sock in it, toting hypocrite 'tard boy.

LMAO yet again at the 'tard in Canukistan.

Please, leave the shortwave to the big boys and concentrate on getting well.

Give my regards to the others in your CanaDuh Health Group Home.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

beerbarrel wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:33:49 GMT, m II wrote:


beerbarrel wrote:


Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black!


Stuff a sock in it, toting hypocrite 'tard boy.






mike


Thanks for proving my point!


Whooooshh...another one goes right over his head. I'm starting to see why denser
stuff settles to the bottom.

Have a nice day, you all...





mike

m II wrote:

beerbarrel wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:33:49 GMT, m II wrote:


beerbarrel wrote:


Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black!


Stuff a sock in it, toting hypocrite 'tard boy.






mike


Thanks for proving my point!

Whooooshh...another one goes right over his head. I'm starting to see why denser
stuff settles to the bottom.

Yeah, the lightweight stuff stays up in CanaDuh...

LMAO yet again at the 'tard in the group home in Canukistan.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

beerbarrel wrote:

On Mon, 23 May 2005 14:42:03 GMT, m II wrote:

beerbarrel wrote:
On Mon, 23 May 2005 13:33:49 GMT, m II wrote:


beerbarrel wrote:


Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black!


Stuff a sock in it, toting hypocrite 'tard boy.






mike


Thanks for proving my point!


Whooooshh...another one goes right over his head. I'm starting to see why denser
stuff settles to the bottom.

Have a nice day, you all...





mike

Are you going to go enjoy the next episode of teletubbies now?

Typical group home fare.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"StratAce" wrote in message Are you going to
go enjoy the next episode of teletubbies now?

Typical group home fare.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



StratAce? Did you just buy a Stratocaster Steve?

B.H.