LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old June 7th 05, 02:07 AM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"R.F. Collins" wrote:

Besides my obvious plug for ham radio, I was also implying that I
don't believe "AM" can continue to be the standard for shortwave
transmission (due to power costs). I don't really think DRM is the
solution either. SSB is more efficient and can be decoded without the
added costs associated wth a proprietary system.

My point is that for shortwave broadcasting to continue, cost of
transmission and reception will be the top priority. Content is
unfortunately not as important.

Just my carefully disguised opinion. Not so much now.


Well, it was indeed carefully disguised. :-)

dxAce
Michigan
USA


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Shortwave is actually experiencing a resurgence" Mike Terry Shortwave 22 April 29th 05 03:54 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } RHF Shortwave 1 January 6th 05 04:00 PM
Too late for DRM on shortwave? Mike Terry Shortwave 9 November 29th 04 03:50 PM
I wonder... mike Shortwave 8 September 5th 03 04:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017