Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "R.F. Collins" wrote: Besides my obvious plug for ham radio, I was also implying that I don't believe "AM" can continue to be the standard for shortwave transmission (due to power costs). I don't really think DRM is the solution either. SSB is more efficient and can be decoded without the added costs associated wth a proprietary system. My point is that for shortwave broadcasting to continue, cost of transmission and reception will be the top priority. Content is unfortunately not as important. Just my carefully disguised opinion. Not so much now. Well, it was indeed carefully disguised. :-) dxAce Michigan USA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Shortwave is actually experiencing a resurgence" | Shortwave | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Frequency & Schedule Resources that are available "OnLine" { Links / URLS } | Shortwave | |||
Too late for DRM on shortwave? | Shortwave | |||
I wonder... | Shortwave |