Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cmd Buzz Corey" skrev i en meddelelse ... Anders Henriksen wrote: Your ground can either be a real low impedance connection to the soil, or just a counterweight to your antenna, I think you mean counterpoise. Yes, my error. Thanks for telling me. Best regards Anders Henriksen, oz7ahr Denmark |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() - But Counterweight sounds better. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan wrote:
- But Counterweight sounds better. Depends if your prefer weight to poise. 'Weight' is certainly manlier... mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
m II wrote:
Dan wrote: - But Counterweight sounds better. Depends if your prefer weight to poise. 'Weight' is certainly manlier... mike RF is weightless! ;-) -- Former professional electron wrangler. Michael A. Terrell Central Florida |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Gain of Vertical Antenna | Antenna | |||
The Apollo Hoax FAQ | General | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
tuning a window frame | Antenna |