Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Does AM MW/HF have a Pre/De-emphasis?
It is late and I have been up a little too long.
I have spent an hour wading through my reffrence books, and the ITU web pages. Earlier today I found a reffrence that states that the "standard Pre/De-emphasis is 75uS", and implies that this is also true for HF. I thought that 75uS was for non-Dolby FM,50Us for US TV and European FM and that MW/AM and HF/AM had no pre/de-emphasis. Have I lost what is left of my mind? I have been trying to decide on the best pivot point for my tone-tilt. Craig at Kiwa used 700Hz. The best diagram I found was from a guitar link and was designed to be used with spring reverbs and had the pivot at 1KHz. I have been experimenting and think I may have to have two, one for 700Hz for male voices, and one about 1.4KHz for females. Does anyone have and use a Kiwa MAP unit? Is the 700Hz too low to be really efective on female voices? Thanks Terry |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... It is late and I have been up a little too long. I have spent an hour wading through my reffrence books, and the ITU web pages. Earlier today I found a reffrence that states that the "standard Pre/De-emphasis is 75uS", and implies that this is also true for HF. I thought that 75uS was for non-Dolby FM,50Us for US TV and European FM and that MW/AM and HF/AM had no pre/de-emphasis. Have I lost what is left of my mind? It's not quite as simple as that. All broadcast audio is processed. Here's a brief history: http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm Clear Channel is adopting IBOC and has developed a coincidental interest in reducing the bandwidth of AM audio: http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml I have been trying to decide on the best pivot point for my tone-tilt. Craig at Kiwa used 700Hz. The best diagram I found was from a guitar link and was designed to be used with spring reverbs and had the pivot at 1KHz. I have been experimenting and think I may have to have two, one for 700Hz for male voices, and one about 1.4KHz for females. There might also be a station to station difference. Stations can process their audio differently. Frank Dresser |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
FM stations in the United Stated use a 75uS deemphasis while European FM
stations use a 50uS deemphasis. The reason for this is because the FM transmitting stations use a preemphasis, boosting the transmitted treble response above a certain frequency. The end result of this technique is a better signal to noise ratio at the receiving end. Without a deemphasis network in your FM receiver, the received audio would sound trebly, similar to, but not exactly not like listening to a dolby encoded tape on a non-dolby tape playback machine. AM stations do not use any preemphasis so a deemphasis network after the detector in your receiver is not required. It is true that digital modes such as IBOC are being use on the MW band, but this is a totally different technique. Pete "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... wrote in message ups.com... It is late and I have been up a little too long. I have spent an hour wading through my reffrence books, and the ITU web pages. Earlier today I found a reffrence that states that the "standard Pre/De-emphasis is 75uS", and implies that this is also true for HF. I thought that 75uS was for non-Dolby FM,50Us for US TV and European FM and that MW/AM and HF/AM had no pre/de-emphasis. Have I lost what is left of my mind? It's not quite as simple as that. All broadcast audio is processed. Here's a brief history: http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm Clear Channel is adopting IBOC and has developed a coincidental interest in reducing the bandwidth of AM audio: http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml I have been trying to decide on the best pivot point for my tone-tilt. Craig at Kiwa used 700Hz. The best diagram I found was from a guitar link and was designed to be used with spring reverbs and had the pivot at 1KHz. I have been experimenting and think I may have to have two, one for 700Hz for male voices, and one about 1.4KHz for females. There might also be a station to station difference. Stations can process their audio differently. Frank Dresser |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete KE9OA" wrote in message ... [snip] AM stations do not use any preemphasis so a deemphasis network after the detector in your receiver is not required. It's my understanding that there's no FCC standard for AM stations to preemphasize their audio, but nearly all do in order to compensate for the normal roll off. I have an old school high fidelity AM receiver, and AM stations usually sound rather shrill on the "Hi-Fi" IF bandwidth position. A quick google search brings up: "In 1977 Orban Associates introduced "Optimod-AM." This unit contained a high-slope receiver equalizer to pre-compensate for the highly rolled-off radios of the time, " http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm "and Omnia exclusives like a pre-emphasis section placed behind the multi-band limiters to create a more consistent, natural sound." http://www.omniaaudio.com/am.htm It is true that digital modes such as IBOC are being use on the MW band, but this is a totally different technique. Pete I brought up IBOC because Clear Channel wants all AM radio stations to limit their audio bandwidth to 5 - 6 kHz. One of the reasons for the change was given: "1. Increased modulation efficiency. By eliminating the broadcast of the high-frequency energy, we can increase the amount of energy that is in the 20 Hz to 5 kHz region. Let's not forget that due to pre-emphasis, higher frequencies are boosted and will have a more profound effect on total modulation than lower frequencies will." http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml I don't know if the IBOC stations use a different preemphasis on the analog channel than the non IBOC stations. Frank Dresser |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Frank,
I didn't realize that..........I thought that the older AM stations took greater pains to have flatter high frequency response. I do remember listening to stations such as WGN on my old McIntosh MR-55, and they sounded very good. The same stations on my Dynaco AF-6 tuner in its wide bandwidth sounded shrill, as you describe. As far as AM receivers, they do not have a deemphasis circuit following the detector. With FM receivers, it is a different story. Thanks for the info! Pete "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "Pete KE9OA" wrote in message ... [snip] AM stations do not use any preemphasis so a deemphasis network after the detector in your receiver is not required. It's my understanding that there's no FCC standard for AM stations to preemphasize their audio, but nearly all do in order to compensate for the normal roll off. I have an old school high fidelity AM receiver, and AM stations usually sound rather shrill on the "Hi-Fi" IF bandwidth position. A quick google search brings up: "In 1977 Orban Associates introduced "Optimod-AM." This unit contained a high-slope receiver equalizer to pre-compensate for the highly rolled-off radios of the time, " http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm "and Omnia exclusives like a pre-emphasis section placed behind the multi-band limiters to create a more consistent, natural sound." http://www.omniaaudio.com/am.htm It is true that digital modes such as IBOC are being use on the MW band, but this is a totally different technique. Pete I brought up IBOC because Clear Channel wants all AM radio stations to limit their audio bandwidth to 5 - 6 kHz. One of the reasons for the change was given: "1. Increased modulation efficiency. By eliminating the broadcast of the high-frequency energy, we can increase the amount of energy that is in the 20 Hz to 5 kHz region. Let's not forget that due to pre-emphasis, higher frequencies are boosted and will have a more profound effect on total modulation than lower frequencies will." http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml I don't know if the IBOC stations use a different preemphasis on the analog channel than the non IBOC stations. Frank Dresser |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Pete KE9OA"
As far as AM receivers, they do not have a deemphasis circuit following the detector. With FM receivers, it is a different story. ___________ But in effect, almost every AM receiver has de-emphasis -- it is the result of the "haystack" amplitude response of their RF/IF circuits driving the 2nd detector. Higher modulating frequencies are rolled off, sometimes very severely. The problem with trying to compensate for it at the AM tx is that the amount needed for "flat" system response varies considerably from rx to rx, and even with carrier frequency. Even so, many MW/SW AM stations do boost their highs, trying to get some of it to pass through the narrowband receivers typically in use these days. RF |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Petet thanks for jumping in. I found this refference while searching
the FCC archive. I thought it was wrong, but just wanted to verify it. Terry |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Anytime Terry!
Pete wrote in message oups.com... Petet thanks for jumping in. I found this refference while searching the FCC archive. I thought it was wrong, but just wanted to verify it. Terry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pete KE9OA wrote:
FM stations in the United Stated use a 75uS deemphasis while European FM stations use a 50uS deemphasis. The reason for this is because the FM transmitting stations use a preemphasis, boosting the transmitted treble response above a certain frequency. The end result of this technique is a better signal to noise ratio at the receiving end. Without a deemphasis network in your FM receiver, the received audio would sound trebly, similar to, but not exactly not like listening to a dolby encoded tape on a non-dolby tape playback machine. AM stations do not use any preemphasis so a deemphasis network after the detector in your receiver is not required. Actually, since NRSC II, yes they do. Part of this was to accomodate AM stereo and make the audio competitive with FM on receivers with sufficiently narrow IF bandwidth to accomodate largely interference free reception. NRSC II also brickwalled audio below 10K, so preemphasis helped overcome the top end losses from shoddily designed IF strips. On a vintage wideband receiver, NRSC II sounds unusually bright. And on an NRSC II receiver the audio quality isn't really what anyone would call high fidelity. Or even medium fidelity. It was a feel good response to cutting the nuts off AM's potential for decent audio in order to accomodate interference free listening as nighttime powers were increased for local AM's. Neither the AM stereo nor the better receiver audio developed as expected. Tell me you're surprised. With the exception of some dedicated receiver manufacturers focussing on AM audio quality, like Fanfare, or builders who produced the limited number of AMAX certifed receivers, most AM manufacturers took NRSC II as a license to build cheaper receivers letting the preemphasis at the transmitter compensate for poorer circuit designs. It is true that digital modes such as IBOC are being use on the MW band, but this is a totally different technique. Pete "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... wrote in message roups.com... It is late and I have been up a little too long. I have spent an hour wading through my reffrence books, and the ITU web pages. Earlier today I found a reffrence that states that the "standard Pre/De-emphasis is 75uS", and implies that this is also true for HF. I thought that 75uS was for non-Dolby FM,50Us for US TV and European FM and that MW/AM and HF/AM had no pre/de-emphasis. Have I lost what is left of my mind? It's not quite as simple as that. All broadcast audio is processed. Here's a brief history: http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm Clear Channel is adopting IBOC and has developed a coincidental interest in reducing the bandwidth of AM audio: http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml I have been trying to decide on the best pivot point for my tone-tilt. Craig at Kiwa used 700Hz. The best diagram I found was from a guitar link and was designed to be used with spring reverbs and had the pivot at 1KHz. I have been experimenting and think I may have to have two, one for 700Hz for male voices, and one about 1.4KHz for females. There might also be a station to station difference. Stations can process their audio differently. Frank Dresser |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Frank Dresser wrote:
It's not quite as simple as that. All broadcast audio is processed. Here's a brief history: http://www.bext.com/histproc.htm Clear Channel is adopting IBOC and has developed a coincidental interest in reducing the bandwidth of AM audio: http://www.rwonline.com/reference-ro...andwidth.shtml There might also be a station to station difference. Stations can process their audio differently. Frank Dresser --------------------------------------------------- I am aware of "standard" audio processing, but the refference giving 75uS on AM through me for a minor loop. Up too long and the old brain was a little too fogged. I tried several local AM stations with 75uS and 50uS and they soundeed very muffled. The exact oppositte of what I am trying to do. I do remember when WLW (700KHz) used to run real clasical music programs on Sunday afternoon, and they clearly broadcast up to at least 10KHz. The cymbols were crystal clear. But that was 35~40 uears ago. Terry |