|
Michael wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. Let me get this straight..... "Dumpster Fodder ???" Your getting carried away.... Personally, I wouldn't even have one around for use as a doorstop. Yes... I understand your reasoning here. In your case having an R-75 to use as a doorstop would be redundant. You've already got you head to act in that capacity. And, it is far better suited to the task. Keep trying 'tard, and I'll keep laughing! dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
You can't recognize a TROLL when you see one?
"Michael" wrote in message ... "mike maghakian" wrote in message ... For the category of SWBC listening and DXing, the satellit 800 is a far superior product, really there is no comparison 1) better sound 2) better selectivity in the stock versions 3) FAR better sync detector, even if it is a fixed version ! Your saying the Sat 800 is a better radio then the R-75 for DX'ing ??? "Medication time" Michael |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:08:37 -0400, "Michael"
wrote: "mike maghakian" wrote in message ... For the category of SWBC listening and DXing, the satellit 800 is a far superior product, really there is no comparison 1) better sound 2) better selectivity in the stock versions 3) FAR better sync detector, even if it is a fixed version ! Your saying the Sat 800 is a better radio then the R-75 for DX'ing ??? "Medication time" Michael ''Listener fatigue'' is a factor in some kinds of DXing. |
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. I personally think you made a fool out of yourself with your drivel and that's about it. Lucky |
"Michael" wrote in message ... "dxAce" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. Let me get this straight..... "Dumpster Fodder ???" Your getting carried away.... Personally, I wouldn't even have one around for use as a doorstop. Yes... I understand your reasoning here. In your case having an R-75 to use as a doorstop would be redundant. You've already got you head to act in that capacity. And, it is far better suited to the task. LOL! I love it. Thanks Mike :) Lucky |
Michael wrote:
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. Let me get this straight..... "Dumpster Fodder ???" Your getting carried away.... Recommend a better radio that will have a PRACTICAL improvement over an R-75 without spending over $ 1,000.00 Please dont spit out specs that hardly differ from that of the R-75 and are not statistically significant PRACTICALLY speaking. Tell me what radio NEW out of the box will give me a PRACTICAL improvement on my R-75 for under $1,000.00 and I'll buy it this week. Remember, this is for DX'ing. I dont want a boom box. Michael Can you list the radios that fall in the $500-$1000 price range the might be candidates for comparison? They would have to be generally available within the US. The radios in the list I'm asking for don't have to meet your "PRACTICAL improvement" criteria. What does "statistically significant PRACTICALLY speaking" mean? craigm |
Lucky wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. I personally think you made a fool out of yourself with your drivel and that's about it. If you think Sherwood Engineering is drivel then you are far more stupid than I've been led to believe, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
"craigm" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote: I find that there isn't anything that I can hear with the R-75 that I can hear with more expensive radios. That's true. Images, birdies, artifacts, intermodulation products -- it's all there. The R-75 is dumpster fodder. Value? yep. Value for money? yep. Absolutely a good value? Not even close. You need to experience a truly good radio. See http://www.sherweng.com for some guidelines. Let me get this straight..... "Dumpster Fodder ???" Your getting carried away.... Recommend a better radio that will have a PRACTICAL improvement over an R-75 without spending over $ 1,000.00 Please dont spit out specs that hardly differ from that of the R-75 and are not statistically significant PRACTICALLY speaking. Tell me what radio NEW out of the box will give me a PRACTICAL improvement on my R-75 for under $1,000.00 and I'll buy it this week. Remember, this is for DX'ing. I dont want a boom box. Michael Can you list the radios that fall in the $500-$1000 price range the might be candidates for comparison? They would have to be generally available within the US. Other then a few computer controlled alternatives, there are no other choices other then the R-75. That's the larger point. The radios in the list I'm asking for don't have to meet your "PRACTICAL improvement" criteria. What does "statistically significant PRACTICALLY speaking" mean? craigm Meaning exactly as stated. Here is an example: The Drake R-8 was tested to have a sensitivity of 0.25 and 0.18 with the pre amp on. The R-75 was tested to have a sensitivy of 0.5 and .02 with the first level pre amp on The Kenwood R-5000 was tested to have a sensitivity of .02 The NRD-525 was tested to have a sensitivity of .02 OK, what do you say ???? You can see what receiver gets the better test numbers here. Think it matters PRACTICALLY speaking given what typical noise floors are ??? Would you feel it was worth it to spend a few thousand dollars to get that extra decimal ??? This applies equally to other values. Do you understand my point yet ???? Michael |
In a completely surprising posting, dxAce wrote:
Keep trying 'tard, and I'll keep laughing! ....yawwwnnnn.... mike |
Michael wrote: Other then a few computer controlled alternatives, there are no other choices other then the R-75. That's the larger point. Michael Well, there's the Palstar R30C and R30CC: http://www.rffun.com/catalog/commrxvr/0330.html Steve |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com