| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:08:37 -0400, "Michael"
wrote: "mike maghakian" wrote in message ... For the category of SWBC listening and DXing, the satellit 800 is a far superior product, really there is no comparison 1) better sound 2) better selectivity in the stock versions 3) FAR better sync detector, even if it is a fixed version ! Your saying the Sat 800 is a better radio then the R-75 for DX'ing ??? "Medication time" Michael ''Listener fatigue'' is a factor in some kinds of DXing. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| PETE [KE9OA] 'status report' on the AM/MW Receiver Project | Shortwave | |||
| RHF Displays His Card-Carrying Member Status in the Rat-Fink Society | Shortwave | |||
| GCN Status? | Shortwave | |||
| Restoring the status quo of Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
| Status of Shortwave. | Shortwave | |||