Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:08:37 -0400, "Michael" wrote: "mike maghakian" wrote in message ... For the category of SWBC listening and DXing, the satellit 800 is a far superior product, really there is no comparison 1) better sound 2) better selectivity in the stock versions 3) FAR better sync detector, even if it is a fixed version ! Your saying the Sat 800 is a better radio then the R-75 for DX'ing ??? "Medication time" Michael ''Listener fatigue'' is a factor in some kinds of DXing. This is the first thing I have EVER seen you post that is both relevent and accurate. Thank you. Please, keep it up. This may be a flame-fest, but it's on topic. -- Eric F. Richards "Nature abhors a vacuum tube." -- Myron Glass, often attributed to J. R. Pierce, Bell Labs, c. 1940 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PETE [KE9OA] 'status report' on the AM/MW Receiver Project | Shortwave | |||
RHF Displays His Card-Carrying Member Status in the Rat-Fink Society | Shortwave | |||
GCN Status? | Shortwave | |||
Restoring the status quo of Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Status of Shortwave. | Shortwave |