Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... I'll say it again: It *is* value for the money, but it is *not* an absolute value. For me, the issue that is important is front-end overload. There are several flamethrowers that put millivolts worth of signal on my antennas. I don't have problems with close-in dynamic range... no one should really have problems with sensitivity on HF. The R75 was nothing but images below 10 MHz without both preamps off and the attenuator on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hmmm,,,, thats odd as I have a combo AM - FM radio station almost literally in my back yard. The stations antennas are maybe 750-800' from my antenna and I have never had any image problems at all. I'm sure there is a birdie or 2 somewhere throughout the bands but I have never noticed any of those either. I listen to ute's and amateur 99% of the time and find the R 75 does very well for this. ( I do use a seperate speaker as the internal one sucks) but that is my biggest complaint. Jeff |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PETE [KE9OA] 'status report' on the AM/MW Receiver Project | Shortwave | |||
RHF Displays His Card-Carrying Member Status in the Rat-Fink Society | Shortwave | |||
GCN Status? | Shortwave | |||
Restoring the status quo of Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Status of Shortwave. | Shortwave |