Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You cn worry about BPL 'till the cows come home. It won't make one whit of difference if the number of active hams continues its steady decline. You couldn't be more wrong. I read a statistical study in which the number of hams world-wide *and* in the U.S. has shown to be steadily increasing. The life of this hobby is at risk if the ARRL doesn't get it's collective head out of the sand and make the radio hobby interesting enough to attract the teens and 20somethings. Cite some precedents - what is your basis for such a statement? Precedents for what...your question makes no sense. You said the hobby is at risk - prove it. The only reason ARRL retains its out of date tests is to control access to the bands, or to act as gatekeeper. And to keep an ever aging group of members happy because they are requiring the same meaningless morse code test that the grey hairs took 40 years ago. Once again - *prove* the the reason the "...ARRL retains its out of date tests is to control access to the bands, or to act as gatekeeper..." snip Which retailers are going out of business? They've already gone. Ummm - the retailers I've dealt with for *years* are still in business. You completely avoided an answer to my question - you didn't even cite one example. The morse code test is the equivalent of requiring prospective car drivers to know how to control a horse and buggy. Fact is the 20 somethings have little or no interest in ham radio and all of its quaint licenses. I can discuss situations in which morse code is the most effective way to communicate in certain situations until I'm blue in the face - it won't change your mind - I've already cited examples and you didn't say a word about them. I wonder why? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mystery Cancer Wiping Out Tasmanian Devils | Swap |